Privilege Newsletter: Investigations - Cooperating With The Government Without Waiving Privilege

In response to a government investigation, the company has conducted a comprehensive internal investigation, taking steps necessary to establish and maintain applicable privileges and protections. The company now wants to cooperate with the government by providing information learned during its investigation, but it wants to avoid waiving privilege in doing so. Even more, it wants to avoid broad subject matter waiver over the investigation. It is axiomatic that facts are not protected by either the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. Instead, the substance of communications, and related notes and summaries, may be protected by both the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. Distilling non-privileged facts from privileged communications to prepare a presentation for the government can be challenging. If the company discloses the substance of identifiable privileged communications, there is a risk of waiver. 
 
A second rule of the road for communicating with the federal government, Federal Rule of Evidence 502(a), limits the risk that disclosure of some privileged information to the government will result in broad subject matter waiver. The traditional rule is that, where a party waives attorney-client privilege over a communication, the scope of waiver may extend to the entire subject matter of the communication. FRE 502(a), where applicable, overrides federal and state substantive law and significantly restricts courts from imposing subject matter waiver. FRE 502(a) provides that disclosures of privileged or protected information in a federal proceeding, or to a federal office or agency, will not result in subject matter waiver unless the waiver was intentional, and fairness requires consideration of undisclosed privileged information. The Committee Notes to FRE 502(a) explain that fairness requires further disclosures only in “unusual situations” where a party makes “a selective and misleading presentation of evidence to the disadvantage of the adversary.”
 
Read the full newsletter here.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Privilege Newsletter: Investigations - Cooperating With The Government Without Waiving Privilege
In response to a government investigation, the company has conducted a comprehensive internal investigation, taking steps necessary to establish and maintain applicable privileges and protections. The company now wants to cooperate with the government by providing information learned during its investigation, but it wants to avoid waiving privilege in doing so. Even more, it wants to avoid broad subject matter waiver over the investigation. It is axiomatic that facts are not protected by either the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. Instead, the substance of communications, and related notes and summaries, may be protected by both the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. Distilling non-privileged facts from privileged communications to prepare a presentation for the government can be challenging. If the company discloses the substance of identifiable privileged communications, there is a risk of waiver. 
 
A second rule of the road for communicating with the federal government, Federal Rule of Evidence 502(a), limits the risk that disclosure of some privileged information to the government will result in broad subject matter waiver. The traditional rule is that, where a party waives attorney-client privilege over a communication, the scope of waiver may extend to the entire subject matter of the communication. FRE 502(a), where applicable, overrides federal and state substantive law and significantly restricts courts from imposing subject matter waiver. FRE 502(a) provides that disclosures of privileged or protected information in a federal proceeding, or to a federal office or agency, will not result in subject matter waiver unless the waiver was intentional, and fairness requires consideration of undisclosed privileged information. The Committee Notes to FRE 502(a) explain that fairness requires further disclosures only in “unusual situations” where a party makes “a selective and misleading presentation of evidence to the disadvantage of the adversary.”
 
Read the full newsletter here.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

News

In Billboard, Partner Precious Jacobs Discusses the Rise in Artist-Manager Litigation

Partner Precious S. Jacobs was featured in Billboard in “It’s Not Just Timbaland: Why Are So Many Artists Suing Their Managers Right Now?.” The article examines the recent wave of lawsuits between music artists and their managers and why that relationship is so prone to conflict.

November 12, 2026

Event

Partner Terri Mascherin to Speak at Illinois State Bar Association Seminar on Negotiation Ethics

On November 11, Partner Terri Mascherin will join a faculty panel for the Illinois State Bar Association (ISBA) continuing legal education (CLE) seminar “Negotiation Ethics: Winning Without Selling Your Soul.”

November 11, 2026

Publications

Partner Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in The Washington Post’s Health Brief

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block’s Congressional Investigations Practice, was quoted in The Washington Post’s Health Brief article examining how the 2026 midterm election results may reshape the health care policy landscape and the industry’s relationship with Washington.

November 10, 2026

Publications

Before You Sign: Key Contract Provisions for Tribes Considering Data Center Developments, ICT

Grace Signorelli-Cassady of Jenner & Block’s Native American Law Practice authored an opinion piece for ICT examining key contract provisions tribes should consider when approached about data center developments.

November 5, 2026

Publications

Jon Skladany and Kayvan Sadeghi Quoted on Fintech Investigation Readiness in Law360

Jenner & Block Partners Jon Skladany and Kayvan Sadeghi were quoted in a Law360 article examining how crypto and fintech companies are preparing for heightened congressional oversight following the 2026 midterm elections.

November 5, 2026