Third Circuit Victory Marks Precedent for How the Filed Rate Doctrine Applies to Auctions
News
March 12, 2024
The Third Circuit agreed with our argument that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission cannot retroactively change the rules of an electric capacity auction after those rules have been applied. The victory represents a precedential ruling about how the filed rate doctrine applies to such auctions.
Auction rules produce the ultimate rates set, and the filed rate doctrine forbids retroactive changes. But in this case, the grid operator that held the auction, PJM Interconnection, LLC, discovered after accepting bids that applying its auction rules would produce a cost increase for some customers. PJM delayed announcing results, and sought FERC’s approval to retroactively amend the rules to produce a different result. In 2023, FERC approved PJM’s change, ruling that the auction results had not officially been announced, so its approval did not violate the filed rate doctrine.
Independent power producers, including client Constellation Energy Corp., challenged FERC’s order. In oral argument in January, Partner Matt Price told the Third Circuit that FERC couldn’t retroactively change the rules. The filed rate doctrine, he said, is an “impenetrable shield” that cannot be breached even to achieve lower rates.
“Once you begin chipping away at it and making exceptions, the whole edifice falls apart," he said.
On March 12, 2024, the Third Circuit vacated FERC’s order.
In its opinion, the panel highlights that predictability was important to Congress, and that is why it adopted a rule forbidding retroactive changes to tariffs. “FERC has no authority to disregard Congress’s will, and neither do we,” the opinion says.
The opinion explains that “stable markets depend on stable rules” and that, by changing the auction rules, FERC “creates unpredictability in the markets.”
“Under FERC’s interpretation of the filed rate doctrine, suppliers must submit binding offers ‘with no assurance about what rules may eventually be applied.’ Auction rules would become, at best, a ‘moving target.’ By eroding confidence in the markets, FERC may ultimately harm consumers who buy electricity in those markets.”
In addition to Matt, the team representing Constellation included Partner Zach Cohen, Special Counsel Anand Viswanathan, Associates Juliana Brint and Arjun Ramamurti, and Senior Paralegal Cheryl Olson and Paralegal Adam Weidman. Partners Ian Gershengorn, Jessie Amunson, and Ishan Bhabha provided invaluable moot courts.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
March 12, 2024
The Third Circuit agreed with our argument that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission cannot retroactively change the rules of an electric capacity auction after those rules have been applied. The victory represents a precedential ruling about how the filed rate doctrine applies to such auctions.
Auction rules produce the ultimate rates set, and the filed rate doctrine forbids retroactive changes. But in this case, the grid operator that held the auction, PJM Interconnection, LLC, discovered after accepting bids that applying its auction rules would produce a cost increase for some customers. PJM delayed announcing results, and sought FERC’s approval to retroactively amend the rules to produce a different result. In 2023, FERC approved PJM’s change, ruling that the auction results had not officially been announced, so its approval did not violate the filed rate doctrine.
Independent power producers, including client Constellation Energy Corp., challenged FERC’s order. In oral argument in January, Partner Matt Price told the Third Circuit that FERC couldn’t retroactively change the rules. The filed rate doctrine, he said, is an “impenetrable shield” that cannot be breached even to achieve lower rates.
“Once you begin chipping away at it and making exceptions, the whole edifice falls apart," he said.
On March 12, 2024, the Third Circuit vacated FERC’s order.
In its opinion, the panel highlights that predictability was important to Congress, and that is why it adopted a rule forbidding retroactive changes to tariffs. “FERC has no authority to disregard Congress’s will, and neither do we,” the opinion says.
The opinion explains that “stable markets depend on stable rules” and that, by changing the auction rules, FERC “creates unpredictability in the markets.”
“Under FERC’s interpretation of the filed rate doctrine, suppliers must submit binding offers ‘with no assurance about what rules may eventually be applied.’ Auction rules would become, at best, a ‘moving target.’ By eroding confidence in the markets, FERC may ultimately harm consumers who buy electricity in those markets.”
In addition to Matt, the team representing Constellation included Partner Zach Cohen, Special Counsel Anand Viswanathan, Associates Juliana Brint and Arjun Ramamurti, and Senior Paralegal Cheryl Olson and Paralegal Adam Weidman. Partners Ian Gershengorn, Jessie Amunson, and Ishan Bhabha provided invaluable moot courts.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026