Third Circuit Victory Marks Precedent for How the Filed Rate Doctrine Applies to Auctions
News
March 12, 2024
The Third Circuit agreed with our argument that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission cannot retroactively change the rules of an electric capacity auction after those rules have been applied. The victory represents a precedential ruling about how the filed rate doctrine applies to such auctions.
Auction rules produce the ultimate rates set, and the filed rate doctrine forbids retroactive changes. But in this case, the grid operator that held the auction, PJM Interconnection, LLC, discovered after accepting bids that applying its auction rules would produce a cost increase for some customers. PJM delayed announcing results, and sought FERC’s approval to retroactively amend the rules to produce a different result. In 2023, FERC approved PJM’s change, ruling that the auction results had not officially been announced, so its approval did not violate the filed rate doctrine.
Independent power producers, including client Constellation Energy Corp., challenged FERC’s order. In oral argument in January, Partner Matt Price told the Third Circuit that FERC couldn’t retroactively change the rules. The filed rate doctrine, he said, is an “impenetrable shield” that cannot be breached even to achieve lower rates.
“Once you begin chipping away at it and making exceptions, the whole edifice falls apart," he said.
On March 12, 2024, the Third Circuit vacated FERC’s order.
In its opinion, the panel highlights that predictability was important to Congress, and that is why it adopted a rule forbidding retroactive changes to tariffs. “FERC has no authority to disregard Congress’s will, and neither do we,” the opinion says.
The opinion explains that “stable markets depend on stable rules” and that, by changing the auction rules, FERC “creates unpredictability in the markets.”
“Under FERC’s interpretation of the filed rate doctrine, suppliers must submit binding offers ‘with no assurance about what rules may eventually be applied.’ Auction rules would become, at best, a ‘moving target.’ By eroding confidence in the markets, FERC may ultimately harm consumers who buy electricity in those markets.”
In addition to Matt, the team representing Constellation included Partner Zach Cohen, Special Counsel Anand Viswanathan, Associates Juliana Brint and Arjun Ramamurti, and Senior Paralegal Cheryl Olson and Paralegal Adam Weidman. Partners Ian Gershengorn, Jessie Amunson, and Ishan Bhabha provided invaluable moot courts.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
March 12, 2024
The Third Circuit agreed with our argument that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission cannot retroactively change the rules of an electric capacity auction after those rules have been applied. The victory represents a precedential ruling about how the filed rate doctrine applies to such auctions.
Auction rules produce the ultimate rates set, and the filed rate doctrine forbids retroactive changes. But in this case, the grid operator that held the auction, PJM Interconnection, LLC, discovered after accepting bids that applying its auction rules would produce a cost increase for some customers. PJM delayed announcing results, and sought FERC’s approval to retroactively amend the rules to produce a different result. In 2023, FERC approved PJM’s change, ruling that the auction results had not officially been announced, so its approval did not violate the filed rate doctrine.
Independent power producers, including client Constellation Energy Corp., challenged FERC’s order. In oral argument in January, Partner Matt Price told the Third Circuit that FERC couldn’t retroactively change the rules. The filed rate doctrine, he said, is an “impenetrable shield” that cannot be breached even to achieve lower rates.
“Once you begin chipping away at it and making exceptions, the whole edifice falls apart," he said.
On March 12, 2024, the Third Circuit vacated FERC’s order.
In its opinion, the panel highlights that predictability was important to Congress, and that is why it adopted a rule forbidding retroactive changes to tariffs. “FERC has no authority to disregard Congress’s will, and neither do we,” the opinion says.
The opinion explains that “stable markets depend on stable rules” and that, by changing the auction rules, FERC “creates unpredictability in the markets.”
“Under FERC’s interpretation of the filed rate doctrine, suppliers must submit binding offers ‘with no assurance about what rules may eventually be applied.’ Auction rules would become, at best, a ‘moving target.’ By eroding confidence in the markets, FERC may ultimately harm consumers who buy electricity in those markets.”
In addition to Matt, the team representing Constellation included Partner Zach Cohen, Special Counsel Anand Viswanathan, Associates Juliana Brint and Arjun Ramamurti, and Senior Paralegal Cheryl Olson and Paralegal Adam Weidman. Partners Ian Gershengorn, Jessie Amunson, and Ishan Bhabha provided invaluable moot courts.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Podcasts
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.
July 15, 2026
Publications
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report
Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
July 14, 2026
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026