Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on Trade Secret Claims in Double Eagle v. Hooper

The Tenth Circuit recently upheld an Oklahoma District Court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a trade secret defendant based on insufficient specificity as to the trade secrets at issue, as well as a lack of proper secrecy over those alleged trade secrets. The case, styled as Double Eagle Alloys, Inc. v. Hooper, included claims under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), Oklahoma Uniform Trade Secrets Act (OUTSA), common law misappropriation, and civil conspiracy.

The Double Eagle plaintiff alleged that its former employee took sensitive files from the company when he left, including product quality specifications, pricing data, and customer drawings. The district court found that the plaintiff did not prove its materials warranted trade secret protection, including because it did not sufficiently differentiate protected from unprotected information. The court dismissed the common law misappropriation claim for lack of evidence of secrecy, and the civil conspiracy claim for the absence of an underlying tort.

The plaintiff appealed each of the district court’s bases for its ruling. But the Tenth Circuit affirmed the summary judgment order, ruling that Double Eagle did not meet its burden to show that its material warranted trade secret protection. In contrast, the defendants offered proof that they independently developed the same or similar product quality specifications, and that other material was readily ascertainable to the public. The Circuit Court also affirmed the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff failed to show what steps it had taken to keep its information secret, and many documents were already available through competitors or customers. Key information, such as pricing data and customer drawings, had been publicly disclosed or shared with third parties. The court also noted that the affidavits the plaintiff presented were conclusory and lacked specifics about the trade secrets or how they were safeguarded.

The ruling underscores the weight of the burden on trade secret plaintiffs to prove their entitlement to trade secret protections.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on Trade Secret Claims in Double Eagle v. Hooper

The Tenth Circuit recently upheld an Oklahoma District Court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of a trade secret defendant based on insufficient specificity as to the trade secrets at issue, as well as a lack of proper secrecy over those alleged trade secrets. The case, styled as Double Eagle Alloys, Inc. v. Hooper, included claims under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), Oklahoma Uniform Trade Secrets Act (OUTSA), common law misappropriation, and civil conspiracy.

The Double Eagle plaintiff alleged that its former employee took sensitive files from the company when he left, including product quality specifications, pricing data, and customer drawings. The district court found that the plaintiff did not prove its materials warranted trade secret protection, including because it did not sufficiently differentiate protected from unprotected information. The court dismissed the common law misappropriation claim for lack of evidence of secrecy, and the civil conspiracy claim for the absence of an underlying tort.

The plaintiff appealed each of the district court’s bases for its ruling. But the Tenth Circuit affirmed the summary judgment order, ruling that Double Eagle did not meet its burden to show that its material warranted trade secret protection. In contrast, the defendants offered proof that they independently developed the same or similar product quality specifications, and that other material was readily ascertainable to the public. The Circuit Court also affirmed the trial court’s finding that the plaintiff failed to show what steps it had taken to keep its information secret, and many documents were already available through competitors or customers. Key information, such as pricing data and customer drawings, had been publicly disclosed or shared with third parties. The court also noted that the affidavits the plaintiff presented were conclusory and lacked specifics about the trade secrets or how they were safeguarded.

The ruling underscores the weight of the burden on trade secret plaintiffs to prove their entitlement to trade secret protections.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

News

In Billboard, Partner Precious Jacobs Discusses the Rise in Artist-Manager Litigation

Partner Precious S. Jacobs was featured in Billboard in “It’s Not Just Timbaland: Why Are So Many Artists Suing Their Managers Right Now?.” The article examines the recent wave of lawsuits between music artists and their managers and why that relationship is so prone to conflict.

November 12, 2026

Event

Partner Terri Mascherin to Speak at Illinois State Bar Association Seminar on Negotiation Ethics

On November 11, Partner Terri Mascherin will join a faculty panel for the Illinois State Bar Association (ISBA) continuing legal education (CLE) seminar “Negotiation Ethics: Winning Without Selling Your Soul.”

November 11, 2026

Publications

Partner Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in The Washington Post’s Health Brief

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block’s Congressional Investigations Practice, was quoted in The Washington Post’s Health Brief article examining how the 2026 midterm election results may reshape the health care policy landscape and the industry’s relationship with Washington.

November 10, 2026

Publications

Before You Sign: Key Contract Provisions for Tribes Considering Data Center Developments, ICT

Grace Signorelli-Cassady of Jenner & Block’s Native American Law Practice authored an opinion piece for ICT examining key contract provisions tribes should consider when approached about data center developments.

November 5, 2026

Publications

Jon Skladany and Kayvan Sadeghi Quoted on Fintech Investigation Readiness in Law360

Jenner & Block Partners Jon Skladany and Kayvan Sadeghi were quoted in a Law360 article examining how crypto and fintech companies are preparing for heightened congressional oversight following the 2026 midterm elections.

November 5, 2026