Native American Tribes Seek Reimbursement for Healthcare Administration Costs in US Supreme Court Argument
News
March 25, 2024
A Jenner & Block team today argued at the US Supreme Court on behalf of the Northern Arapaho Tribe, seeking reimbursement from the Indian Health Services (IHS) for certain “contract support costs” – the overhead costs for tribe-provided health care.
Previously, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Northern Arapaho Tribe, ordering the IHS to pay $1.5 million in administrative costs incurred from the provision of healthcare services for tribal citizens. The IHS has refused to reimburse costs incurred for providing services paid for by Medicare, Medicaid, or insurance reimbursements.
The San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona also argued before the Court today, seeking to preserve the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in which it won reimbursement for $3 million for three-year’s worth of administrative costs for tribal run health care and wellness programs.
Under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA), tribes are entitled to reimbursement for the indirect costs incurred in providing services, regardless of whether those services are paid for by the IHS or other sources.
“The intent of Congress is clear,” said Partner Adam Unikowsky, who argued on behalf of the tribe. “The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act unambiguously entitles the Tribe to collect contract support costs arising from its expenditures on tribal healthcare at issue in this case. The Indian Health Service’s effort to avoid payment undermines the Tribe’s healthcare program and imposes a self-determination penalty on the tribes despite Congress’ intent to avoid that result.” Read the brief.
In 2016, the Northern Arapaho Tribe contracted with IHS to administer a broad range of health care services on the Wind River Reservation, including outpatient ambulatory medical care and primary care, nursing, mental health, radiology, physical therapy, optometry, dental care, community health services, and laboratory and pharmacy services. The Wind River Service Unit, which provides these services for approximately 12,000 patients primarily from the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes, is tied for the lowest level of funding sufficiency across all IHS-funding programs. Due to this severe underfunding, health services on the Wind River Reservation are provided from a health center constructed as a military commissary in 1884 – the oldest IHS facility in the nation.
Unreimbursed contract support costs strike at an already underfunded tribal health care system. As the tribe wrote in their Supreme Court brief, “If tribes cannot recover the contract support costs that they incur when making the same expenditures as IHS, they are penalized for entering into ISDA contracts – precisely the result Congress sought to avoid in ensuring that other contract support costs would be paid.”
There is broad support for the tribes’ pursuit of contract support payments, including a joint amicus brief filed by the National Congress of American Indians, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Citizen Potawatomi Nation, Coquille Indian Tribe, Forest County Potawatomi Community, Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, Navajo Nation, Pueblo of Acoma, Pueblo of San Felipe, and Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, as well as the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, the Intertribal Association of Arizona Inc., and the United South and Eastern Tribes.
In addition to Adam, the Jenner & Block team includes Partners Keith Harper and Charlie Galbraith; Special Counsel Lenny Powell; Associates Arjun Ramamurti and Andrew DeGuglielmo; and Law Clerk Donovan Hicks.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
March 25, 2024
A Jenner & Block team today argued at the US Supreme Court on behalf of the Northern Arapaho Tribe, seeking reimbursement from the Indian Health Services (IHS) for certain “contract support costs” – the overhead costs for tribe-provided health care.
Previously, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Northern Arapaho Tribe, ordering the IHS to pay $1.5 million in administrative costs incurred from the provision of healthcare services for tribal citizens. The IHS has refused to reimburse costs incurred for providing services paid for by Medicare, Medicaid, or insurance reimbursements.
The San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona also argued before the Court today, seeking to preserve the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in which it won reimbursement for $3 million for three-year’s worth of administrative costs for tribal run health care and wellness programs.
Under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA), tribes are entitled to reimbursement for the indirect costs incurred in providing services, regardless of whether those services are paid for by the IHS or other sources.
“The intent of Congress is clear,” said Partner Adam Unikowsky, who argued on behalf of the tribe. “The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act unambiguously entitles the Tribe to collect contract support costs arising from its expenditures on tribal healthcare at issue in this case. The Indian Health Service’s effort to avoid payment undermines the Tribe’s healthcare program and imposes a self-determination penalty on the tribes despite Congress’ intent to avoid that result.” Read the brief.
In 2016, the Northern Arapaho Tribe contracted with IHS to administer a broad range of health care services on the Wind River Reservation, including outpatient ambulatory medical care and primary care, nursing, mental health, radiology, physical therapy, optometry, dental care, community health services, and laboratory and pharmacy services. The Wind River Service Unit, which provides these services for approximately 12,000 patients primarily from the Northern Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes, is tied for the lowest level of funding sufficiency across all IHS-funding programs. Due to this severe underfunding, health services on the Wind River Reservation are provided from a health center constructed as a military commissary in 1884 – the oldest IHS facility in the nation.
Unreimbursed contract support costs strike at an already underfunded tribal health care system. As the tribe wrote in their Supreme Court brief, “If tribes cannot recover the contract support costs that they incur when making the same expenditures as IHS, they are penalized for entering into ISDA contracts – precisely the result Congress sought to avoid in ensuring that other contract support costs would be paid.”
There is broad support for the tribes’ pursuit of contract support payments, including a joint amicus brief filed by the National Congress of American Indians, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Citizen Potawatomi Nation, Coquille Indian Tribe, Forest County Potawatomi Community, Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, Navajo Nation, Pueblo of Acoma, Pueblo of San Felipe, and Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe, as well as the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, the Intertribal Association of Arizona Inc., and the United South and Eastern Tribes.
In addition to Adam, the Jenner & Block team includes Partners Keith Harper and Charlie Galbraith; Special Counsel Lenny Powell; Associates Arjun Ramamurti and Andrew DeGuglielmo; and Law Clerk Donovan Hicks.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026