Jenner & Block Secures Appellate Victory for US Tsubaki Holdings

Jenner & Block obtained a resounding victory when the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department ruled on a critical appeal. The court unanimously reversed a trial court decision, reinstating all four fraud causes of action (for fraudulent inducement, fraudulent concealment, fraudulent misrepresentation, and aiding and abetting fraud) that the trial court had dismissed.

In 2019, our client US Tsubaki Holdings (USTH) filed a complaint against former owners of Central Conveyor Holdings, Inc. and their affiliates based on conduct that occurred at the company before the acquisition, alleging contract breaches and that false representations and warranties made to USTH in conjunction with the sale fraudulently induced USTH to acquire Central Conveyor. Throughout the sales process and then in the purchase and sale agreement (PSA), the Sellers represented that Central Conveyor was a quality operation, with promises that the company had an adequate system of internal controls over financial reporting, that it was in compliance with all aspects of employment, labor, and tax laws, that its financial statements were accurate, and that the company had no undisclosed legal or tax liabilities.

Last year, the trial court dismissed USTH’s fraud claims. On May 20, the appellate court agreed with USTH on the fundamental principle that the fraud stemmed from corporate misconduct at Central Conveyor—with special attention paid to the fact that “kickbacks and timesheet fraud were how the Company ensured profitability.” The court also agreed on every aspect of whether USTH’s pleading adequately met the fraud pleading standard. On aiding and abetting fraud, the court concluded that USTH’s Amended Complaint alleges the elements of aiding and abetting fraud against all three relevant defendants. In particular, it recognized that the act of signing the PSA helped to “mov[e] the fraud to fruition” and therefore could constitute substantial assistance. Finally, on the threshold legal issue of whether the fraud claims duplicate the contract claim, the court reaffirmed precedent holding that fraudulent misrepresentations of present facts memorialized in representations and warranties may sustain a claim for fraud. In addition, the court recognized that the PSA specifically preserved USTH’s ability to sue for fraud.

Partner Ian Heath Gershengorn argued the appeal. Partner Brent Caslin has led the litigation team, which included Partners Elizabeth A. Edmondson and Brian J. Fischer, Associates Olivia Hoffman, Andrew G. Sullivan, Ethan C. Wong, Allison N. Douglis, and former associate Eric Lamm. Invaluable assistance was provided by Partners Jessica Ring Amunson, Donald E. Batterson, Ishan K. Bhabha, Miwa Shoda, and Zachary C. Schauf and Paralegal Chris Ward.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Jenner & Block Secures Appellate Victory for US Tsubaki Holdings

Jenner & Block obtained a resounding victory when the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department ruled on a critical appeal. The court unanimously reversed a trial court decision, reinstating all four fraud causes of action (for fraudulent inducement, fraudulent concealment, fraudulent misrepresentation, and aiding and abetting fraud) that the trial court had dismissed.

In 2019, our client US Tsubaki Holdings (USTH) filed a complaint against former owners of Central Conveyor Holdings, Inc. and their affiliates based on conduct that occurred at the company before the acquisition, alleging contract breaches and that false representations and warranties made to USTH in conjunction with the sale fraudulently induced USTH to acquire Central Conveyor. Throughout the sales process and then in the purchase and sale agreement (PSA), the Sellers represented that Central Conveyor was a quality operation, with promises that the company had an adequate system of internal controls over financial reporting, that it was in compliance with all aspects of employment, labor, and tax laws, that its financial statements were accurate, and that the company had no undisclosed legal or tax liabilities.

Last year, the trial court dismissed USTH’s fraud claims. On May 20, the appellate court agreed with USTH on the fundamental principle that the fraud stemmed from corporate misconduct at Central Conveyor—with special attention paid to the fact that “kickbacks and timesheet fraud were how the Company ensured profitability.” The court also agreed on every aspect of whether USTH’s pleading adequately met the fraud pleading standard. On aiding and abetting fraud, the court concluded that USTH’s Amended Complaint alleges the elements of aiding and abetting fraud against all three relevant defendants. In particular, it recognized that the act of signing the PSA helped to “mov[e] the fraud to fruition” and therefore could constitute substantial assistance. Finally, on the threshold legal issue of whether the fraud claims duplicate the contract claim, the court reaffirmed precedent holding that fraudulent misrepresentations of present facts memorialized in representations and warranties may sustain a claim for fraud. In addition, the court recognized that the PSA specifically preserved USTH’s ability to sue for fraud.

Partner Ian Heath Gershengorn argued the appeal. Partner Brent Caslin has led the litigation team, which included Partners Elizabeth A. Edmondson and Brian J. Fischer, Associates Olivia Hoffman, Andrew G. Sullivan, Ethan C. Wong, Allison N. Douglis, and former associate Eric Lamm. Invaluable assistance was provided by Partners Jessica Ring Amunson, Donald E. Batterson, Ishan K. Bhabha, Miwa Shoda, and Zachary C. Schauf and Paralegal Chris Ward.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Podcasts

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.

July 15, 2026

Publications

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report

Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

July 14, 2026

Publications

Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.

July 7, 2026

Publications

In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision

Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.

July 1, 2026

Event

Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference

On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.

July 1, 2026