Jenner & Block Secures Unanimous US Supreme Court Victory in FBI v. Fikre
News
March 19, 2024
In a unanimous decision, the US Supreme Court today ruled in favor of our client, Yonas Fikre.
Partners Lindsay Harrison and Annie Kastanek, who represented Mr. Fikre, said, “We are proud to have helped Mr. Fikre secure justice through this unanimous US Supreme Court decision. Mr. Fikre was unconstitutionally placed on the No Fly List and stranded overseas for four years, and today’s victory underscores that the government cannot evade review of its national security policies by selectively mooting out cases."
In 2013, Mr. Fikre, a law-abiding US citizen, sued the FBI and alleged that his placement on the No Fly List violated his constitutional rights to due process. After four years of litigation, the FBI removed Mr. Fikre from the No Fly List without explanation and promised not to put him on it again “based on the currently available information.” As a result, the government argued that his lawsuit was moot. The Ninth Circuit disagreed, and the United States sought review by the Supreme Court.
Today’s Supreme Court opinion underscores the shortcomings of the government’s argument. “Put simply, the government’s sparse declaration falls short of demonstrating that it cannot reasonably be expected to do again in the future what it is alleged to have done in the past."
Jenner & Block worked alongside CAIR Legal Defense Fund and the Jenner & Block Supreme Court & Appellate Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School to argue that Mr. Fikre’s case was not moot because the government’s promise did not adequately assure Mr. Fikre that the constitutional violations would not recur. Specifically, the government retained the ability to re-list Mr. Fikre, made no promises that if it did so he would receive advance notice or a hearing, made no commitment that he would not be relisted for the same kinds of conduct that resulted in his first listing, and had not even disclosed the basis for Mr. Fikre’s listing. As a result, Mr. Fikre argued that there remained a live controversy for a court to redress.
The Supreme Court agreed with our argument, writing in their opinion, “Were the rule more forgiving, a defendant might suspend its challenged conduct after being sued, win dismissal, and later pick up where it left off; it might even repeat ‘this cycle’ as necessary until it achieves all of its allegedly ‘unlawful ends.’ A live case or controversy cannot be so easily disguised, and a federal court’s constitutional authority cannot be so readily manipulated."
The Jenner team includes Washington, DC Office Managing Partner Lindsay Harrison; Appellate Co-Chairs Annie Kastanek and Matt Hellman; Special Counsel Ali Alsarraf; and Associates Benjamin Alter, Maria LaBella, and Sophie Montgomery. Senior Paralegal/Paralegal Coordinator Cheryl Olson and Manger of Docketing Services Tyler Edwards provided valuable assistance.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
March 19, 2024
In a unanimous decision, the US Supreme Court today ruled in favor of our client, Yonas Fikre.
Partners Lindsay Harrison and Annie Kastanek, who represented Mr. Fikre, said, “We are proud to have helped Mr. Fikre secure justice through this unanimous US Supreme Court decision. Mr. Fikre was unconstitutionally placed on the No Fly List and stranded overseas for four years, and today’s victory underscores that the government cannot evade review of its national security policies by selectively mooting out cases."
In 2013, Mr. Fikre, a law-abiding US citizen, sued the FBI and alleged that his placement on the No Fly List violated his constitutional rights to due process. After four years of litigation, the FBI removed Mr. Fikre from the No Fly List without explanation and promised not to put him on it again “based on the currently available information.” As a result, the government argued that his lawsuit was moot. The Ninth Circuit disagreed, and the United States sought review by the Supreme Court.
Today’s Supreme Court opinion underscores the shortcomings of the government’s argument. “Put simply, the government’s sparse declaration falls short of demonstrating that it cannot reasonably be expected to do again in the future what it is alleged to have done in the past."
Jenner & Block worked alongside CAIR Legal Defense Fund and the Jenner & Block Supreme Court & Appellate Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School to argue that Mr. Fikre’s case was not moot because the government’s promise did not adequately assure Mr. Fikre that the constitutional violations would not recur. Specifically, the government retained the ability to re-list Mr. Fikre, made no promises that if it did so he would receive advance notice or a hearing, made no commitment that he would not be relisted for the same kinds of conduct that resulted in his first listing, and had not even disclosed the basis for Mr. Fikre’s listing. As a result, Mr. Fikre argued that there remained a live controversy for a court to redress.
The Supreme Court agreed with our argument, writing in their opinion, “Were the rule more forgiving, a defendant might suspend its challenged conduct after being sued, win dismissal, and later pick up where it left off; it might even repeat ‘this cycle’ as necessary until it achieves all of its allegedly ‘unlawful ends.’ A live case or controversy cannot be so easily disguised, and a federal court’s constitutional authority cannot be so readily manipulated."
The Jenner team includes Washington, DC Office Managing Partner Lindsay Harrison; Appellate Co-Chairs Annie Kastanek and Matt Hellman; Special Counsel Ali Alsarraf; and Associates Benjamin Alter, Maria LaBella, and Sophie Montgomery. Senior Paralegal/Paralegal Coordinator Cheryl Olson and Manger of Docketing Services Tyler Edwards provided valuable assistance.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Podcasts
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.
July 15, 2026
Publications
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report
Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
July 14, 2026
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026