執行再開:トランプ政権が「海外腐敗行為防止法(FCPA)の執行一時停止」を解除

トランプ政権は、20256月に新たなガイドライン(以下「本ガイドライン」)を発表し、海外腐敗行為防止法(FCPA)の執行一時停止を解除した。この4か月間続いた一時停止措置は、トランプ大統領が、同年2月に大統領令14209に署名し、米国司法省(DOJ)に対して、「既存のすべてのFCPA調査・執行措置」を再評価すること、米国の経済的・国家安全保障上の利益を優先するポリシーを策定すること、を指示したことから始まったものである。

重要な変更点:FCPAの調査・執行に関するガイドライン

Todd Blanche司法副長官が発行した本ガイドラインでは、以下の通り、FCPA調査の5つの主要な重点分野が定められている。

  1. 麻薬カルテルと国際的犯罪組織(TCOs)への継続的な取り締まり:これらの組織に関連するマネーロンダリングや外国公務員への賄賂に関する案件を含む。
  2. 海外で事業を展開する米国企業を支援するためのFCPAの活用:本ガイドラインの下では、不正行為が米国企業の公正な競争の機会を奪ったり、米国企業に経済的損害を与えたりした案件が優先される。
  3. 米国の国家安全保障の促進:重要インフラ、深海港、鉱物、その他の戦略的資産に関する執行措置がその手段となる。
  4. 重大な不正行為の調査を優先:本ガイドラインでは、通常のビジネス慣行ではなく、重大な不正行為に焦点を当てるべきであると述べられている。具体的には、多額の賄賂、高度な隠蔽工作、司法妨害が対象となり、「些細な(de-minimis)」ビジネス上の礼儀は対象外となる。
  5. その他の考慮要素:その他の変更点には、新たな調査に際してDOJ高官の承認を義務付けること、調査全体を通じて「付随的な影響」を考慮すること、企業構造ではなく個人に焦点を当てること、迅速な調査を重視すること、が含まれる。

影響とリスク

これらの変更は、一部の状況においては米国企業の利益となる可能性があるが、潜在的なリスクを伴うものである。米国の利益に明白に焦点を当てることにより、その代償として、外国の規制当局による保護主義的アプローチを招く可能性がある。20253月に、英国、フランス、スイスが国際腐敗防止訴追タスクフォースを設立するなど、欧州諸国は既に、独自に贈収賄防止に関する執行を域外適用できる体制を開始している。

FCPA執行の優先事項は変更となったものの、FCPAには5年から6年の時効期間があり、現在の案件が将来の政権下で再検討される可能性があるため、企業は、依然として堅固なコンプライアンスプログラムを維持する必要がある。また、証券取引委員会(SEC)が並行して有するFCPA管轄権についても、新たな枠組みの下で不明確なままである。

本ガイドラインでは、継続的に積極的な執行措置をとることが示されているが、明確に米国の利益を重視している点は、過去の政権が掲げていた広範な腐敗防止目標から大きな転換があることを意味している。

この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

[1] On the same day that the new FCPA guidelines were issued, Galeotti delivered remarks at the American Conference Institute Conference on Global Anti-Corruption, Ethics & Compliance related to the new FCPA guidelines and the broader May 12, 2025 white-collar enforcement guidelines. Galeotti emphasized that the guidelines provide a non-exhaustive list of factors and evaluation criteria for FCPA enforcement. He characterized these guidelines as a step towards “the vindication of US interest.”

[2] The May 12, 2025 memo on white-collar enforcement outlines the Criminal Division’s enforcement priorities and policies for prosecuting corporate and white collar-crime. It has several overlapping themes with the new FCPA guidelines: (1) a focus on protecting US interests by limiting the burdens/harms from white-collar investigations and prosecutions; (2) a focus on Chinese companies; (3) a focus on Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs); (4) and a shift towards prosecuting individuals instead of assigning the malfeasance to companies. See US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, “Focus, Fairness, and Efficiency in the Fight Against White-Collar Crime” (May 12, 2025).

[3] For more information on the Executive Order, please see: Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Trump Administration Calls for a Pause on New FCPA Enforcement, but Don’t Abandon Compliance Programs Just Yet” (Feb. 14, 2025).

[4] See Executive Order 14209, “Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security,” Sec. 2 (Feb. 10, 2025).

[5] Office of the Attorney General, “Total Elimination of Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations” (Feb. 5, 2025).

[6] TCOs refer to organized crime coordinated across national borders, involving groups or markets of individuals working in more than one country to plan and execute illegal business ventures. See Yuriy A. Voronin, “Measures to Control Transnational Organized Crime,” Summary, Nat’l Criminal Just. Reference Serv., U.S. Dep’t of Just., NCJ No. 184773, (2000).

[7] Often more important than stated policy objectives, staffing (for FCPA) remains an open question. The Trump Administration’s priorities may be more obviously reflected in whether the resources for bringing FCPA cases remain within the DOJ or if they have been diverted to other more pressing concerns. This includes the need for a clearer understanding of the number of trial lawyers in the FCPA Unit itself, the support of detailees to the Unit, and the capacity for bringing these cases at the 93 US Attorney’s Offices around the country.

[8] See Office of the Attorney General, “Guidelines for Investigations and Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)”, Sec. 1(A) (June 9, 2025).

[9] Id., Sec. 1(B).

[10] The memo also instructs prosecutors in conducting investigations and prosecutions under the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1352, which criminalizes the “demand side” of foreign bribery, to consider whether specific and identifiable US entities or individuals have been harmed by foreign officials’ demands for bribes.

[11] Supra note 1.

[12] Supra note 7, Sec. 1(C).

[13] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[14]Supra note 7, Sec. 1(D).

[15] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[16] Id.

[17] Id.

[18] Id.

[19] Supra note 7, Sec. 2.

[20] Supra note 7 at 1.

[21] Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Case for Compliance: Why UK and EU Businesses Should Continue to Invest in Their Compliance Programs” (Mar. 24, 2025).

[22] Law 360 UK, “Ephgrave Eyes Covert Tactics To Fix Drop in Self-Reporting” (April 3, 2025).

[23] GOV.UK, “UK, France and Switzerland announce new anti-corruption alliance” (Mar. 20, 2025).

[24] International Anti-Corruption Prosecutorial Taskforce, Founding Statement (Mar. 20, 2025).

[25] 18 U.S.C. § 3292

Footnotes

[1] On the same day that the new FCPA guidelines were issued, Galeotti delivered remarks at the American Conference Institute Conference on Global Anti-Corruption, Ethics & Compliance related to the new FCPA guidelines and the broader May 12, 2025 white-collar enforcement guidelines. Galeotti emphasized that the guidelines provide a non-exhaustive list of factors and evaluation criteria for FCPA enforcement. He characterized these guidelines as a step towards “the vindication of US interest.”

[2] The May 12, 2025 memo on white-collar enforcement outlines the Criminal Division’s enforcement priorities and policies for prosecuting corporate and white collar-crime. It has several overlapping themes with the new FCPA guidelines: (1) a focus on protecting US interests by limiting the burdens/harms from white-collar investigations and prosecutions; (2) a focus on Chinese companies; (3) a focus on Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs); (4) and a shift towards prosecuting individuals instead of assigning the malfeasance to companies. See US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, “Focus, Fairness, and Efficiency in the Fight Against White-Collar Crime” (May 12, 2025).

[3] For more information on the Executive Order, please see: Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Trump Administration Calls for a Pause on New FCPA Enforcement, but Don’t Abandon Compliance Programs Just Yet” (Feb. 14, 2025).

[4] See Executive Order 14209, “Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security,” Sec. 2 (Feb. 10, 2025).

[5] Office of the Attorney General, “Total Elimination of Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations” (Feb. 5, 2025).

[6] TCOs refer to organized crime coordinated across national borders, involving groups or markets of individuals working in more than one country to plan and execute illegal business ventures. See Yuriy A. Voronin, “Measures to Control Transnational Organized Crime,” Summary, Nat’l Criminal Just. Reference Serv., U.S. Dep’t of Just., NCJ No. 184773, (2000).

[7] Often more important than stated policy objectives, staffing (for FCPA) remains an open question. The Trump Administration’s priorities may be more obviously reflected in whether the resources for bringing FCPA cases remain within the DOJ or if they have been diverted to other more pressing concerns. This includes the need for a clearer understanding of the number of trial lawyers in the FCPA Unit itself, the support of detailees to the Unit, and the capacity for bringing these cases at the 93 US Attorney’s Offices around the country.

[8] See Office of the Attorney General, “Guidelines for Investigations and Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)”, Sec. 1(A) (June 9, 2025).

[9] Id., Sec. 1(B).

[10] The memo also instructs prosecutors in conducting investigations and prosecutions under the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1352, which criminalizes the “demand side” of foreign bribery, to consider whether specific and identifiable US entities or individuals have been harmed by foreign officials’ demands for bribes.

[11] Supra note 1.

[12] Supra note 7, Sec. 1(C).

[13] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[14]Supra note 7, Sec. 1(D).

[15] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[16] Id.

[17] Id.

[18] Id.

[19] Supra note 7, Sec. 2.

[20] Supra note 7 at 1.

[21] Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Case for Compliance: Why UK and EU Businesses Should Continue to Invest in Their Compliance Programs” (Mar. 24, 2025).

[22] Law 360 UK, “Ephgrave Eyes Covert Tactics To Fix Drop in Self-Reporting” (April 3, 2025).

[23] GOV.UK, “UK, France and Switzerland announce new anti-corruption alliance” (Mar. 20, 2025).

[24] International Anti-Corruption Prosecutorial Taskforce, Founding Statement (Mar. 20, 2025).

[25] 18 U.S.C. § 3292

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

執行再開:トランプ政権が「海外腐敗行為防止法(FCPA)の執行一時停止」を解除

トランプ政権は、20256月に新たなガイドライン(以下「本ガイドライン」)を発表し、海外腐敗行為防止法(FCPA)の執行一時停止を解除した。この4か月間続いた一時停止措置は、トランプ大統領が、同年2月に大統領令14209に署名し、米国司法省(DOJ)に対して、「既存のすべてのFCPA調査・執行措置」を再評価すること、米国の経済的・国家安全保障上の利益を優先するポリシーを策定すること、を指示したことから始まったものである。

重要な変更点:FCPAの調査・執行に関するガイドライン

Todd Blanche司法副長官が発行した本ガイドラインでは、以下の通り、FCPA調査の5つの主要な重点分野が定められている。

  1. 麻薬カルテルと国際的犯罪組織(TCOs)への継続的な取り締まり:これらの組織に関連するマネーロンダリングや外国公務員への賄賂に関する案件を含む。
  2. 海外で事業を展開する米国企業を支援するためのFCPAの活用:本ガイドラインの下では、不正行為が米国企業の公正な競争の機会を奪ったり、米国企業に経済的損害を与えたりした案件が優先される。
  3. 米国の国家安全保障の促進:重要インフラ、深海港、鉱物、その他の戦略的資産に関する執行措置がその手段となる。
  4. 重大な不正行為の調査を優先:本ガイドラインでは、通常のビジネス慣行ではなく、重大な不正行為に焦点を当てるべきであると述べられている。具体的には、多額の賄賂、高度な隠蔽工作、司法妨害が対象となり、「些細な(de-minimis)」ビジネス上の礼儀は対象外となる。
  5. その他の考慮要素:その他の変更点には、新たな調査に際してDOJ高官の承認を義務付けること、調査全体を通じて「付随的な影響」を考慮すること、企業構造ではなく個人に焦点を当てること、迅速な調査を重視すること、が含まれる。

影響とリスク

これらの変更は、一部の状況においては米国企業の利益となる可能性があるが、潜在的なリスクを伴うものである。米国の利益に明白に焦点を当てることにより、その代償として、外国の規制当局による保護主義的アプローチを招く可能性がある。20253月に、英国、フランス、スイスが国際腐敗防止訴追タスクフォースを設立するなど、欧州諸国は既に、独自に贈収賄防止に関する執行を域外適用できる体制を開始している。

FCPA執行の優先事項は変更となったものの、FCPAには5年から6年の時効期間があり、現在の案件が将来の政権下で再検討される可能性があるため、企業は、依然として堅固なコンプライアンスプログラムを維持する必要がある。また、証券取引委員会(SEC)が並行して有するFCPA管轄権についても、新たな枠組みの下で不明確なままである。

本ガイドラインでは、継続的に積極的な執行措置をとることが示されているが、明確に米国の利益を重視している点は、過去の政権が掲げていた広範な腐敗防止目標から大きな転換があることを意味している。

この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

[1] On the same day that the new FCPA guidelines were issued, Galeotti delivered remarks at the American Conference Institute Conference on Global Anti-Corruption, Ethics & Compliance related to the new FCPA guidelines and the broader May 12, 2025 white-collar enforcement guidelines. Galeotti emphasized that the guidelines provide a non-exhaustive list of factors and evaluation criteria for FCPA enforcement. He characterized these guidelines as a step towards “the vindication of US interest.”

[2] The May 12, 2025 memo on white-collar enforcement outlines the Criminal Division’s enforcement priorities and policies for prosecuting corporate and white collar-crime. It has several overlapping themes with the new FCPA guidelines: (1) a focus on protecting US interests by limiting the burdens/harms from white-collar investigations and prosecutions; (2) a focus on Chinese companies; (3) a focus on Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs); (4) and a shift towards prosecuting individuals instead of assigning the malfeasance to companies. See US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, “Focus, Fairness, and Efficiency in the Fight Against White-Collar Crime” (May 12, 2025).

[3] For more information on the Executive Order, please see: Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Trump Administration Calls for a Pause on New FCPA Enforcement, but Don’t Abandon Compliance Programs Just Yet” (Feb. 14, 2025).

[4] See Executive Order 14209, “Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security,” Sec. 2 (Feb. 10, 2025).

[5] Office of the Attorney General, “Total Elimination of Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations” (Feb. 5, 2025).

[6] TCOs refer to organized crime coordinated across national borders, involving groups or markets of individuals working in more than one country to plan and execute illegal business ventures. See Yuriy A. Voronin, “Measures to Control Transnational Organized Crime,” Summary, Nat’l Criminal Just. Reference Serv., U.S. Dep’t of Just., NCJ No. 184773, (2000).

[7] Often more important than stated policy objectives, staffing (for FCPA) remains an open question. The Trump Administration’s priorities may be more obviously reflected in whether the resources for bringing FCPA cases remain within the DOJ or if they have been diverted to other more pressing concerns. This includes the need for a clearer understanding of the number of trial lawyers in the FCPA Unit itself, the support of detailees to the Unit, and the capacity for bringing these cases at the 93 US Attorney’s Offices around the country.

[8] See Office of the Attorney General, “Guidelines for Investigations and Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)”, Sec. 1(A) (June 9, 2025).

[9] Id., Sec. 1(B).

[10] The memo also instructs prosecutors in conducting investigations and prosecutions under the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1352, which criminalizes the “demand side” of foreign bribery, to consider whether specific and identifiable US entities or individuals have been harmed by foreign officials’ demands for bribes.

[11] Supra note 1.

[12] Supra note 7, Sec. 1(C).

[13] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[14]Supra note 7, Sec. 1(D).

[15] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[16] Id.

[17] Id.

[18] Id.

[19] Supra note 7, Sec. 2.

[20] Supra note 7 at 1.

[21] Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Case for Compliance: Why UK and EU Businesses Should Continue to Invest in Their Compliance Programs” (Mar. 24, 2025).

[22] Law 360 UK, “Ephgrave Eyes Covert Tactics To Fix Drop in Self-Reporting” (April 3, 2025).

[23] GOV.UK, “UK, France and Switzerland announce new anti-corruption alliance” (Mar. 20, 2025).

[24] International Anti-Corruption Prosecutorial Taskforce, Founding Statement (Mar. 20, 2025).

[25] 18 U.S.C. § 3292

Footnotes

[1] On the same day that the new FCPA guidelines were issued, Galeotti delivered remarks at the American Conference Institute Conference on Global Anti-Corruption, Ethics & Compliance related to the new FCPA guidelines and the broader May 12, 2025 white-collar enforcement guidelines. Galeotti emphasized that the guidelines provide a non-exhaustive list of factors and evaluation criteria for FCPA enforcement. He characterized these guidelines as a step towards “the vindication of US interest.”

[2] The May 12, 2025 memo on white-collar enforcement outlines the Criminal Division’s enforcement priorities and policies for prosecuting corporate and white collar-crime. It has several overlapping themes with the new FCPA guidelines: (1) a focus on protecting US interests by limiting the burdens/harms from white-collar investigations and prosecutions; (2) a focus on Chinese companies; (3) a focus on Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs); (4) and a shift towards prosecuting individuals instead of assigning the malfeasance to companies. See US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, “Focus, Fairness, and Efficiency in the Fight Against White-Collar Crime” (May 12, 2025).

[3] For more information on the Executive Order, please see: Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Trump Administration Calls for a Pause on New FCPA Enforcement, but Don’t Abandon Compliance Programs Just Yet” (Feb. 14, 2025).

[4] See Executive Order 14209, “Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security,” Sec. 2 (Feb. 10, 2025).

[5] Office of the Attorney General, “Total Elimination of Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations” (Feb. 5, 2025).

[6] TCOs refer to organized crime coordinated across national borders, involving groups or markets of individuals working in more than one country to plan and execute illegal business ventures. See Yuriy A. Voronin, “Measures to Control Transnational Organized Crime,” Summary, Nat’l Criminal Just. Reference Serv., U.S. Dep’t of Just., NCJ No. 184773, (2000).

[7] Often more important than stated policy objectives, staffing (for FCPA) remains an open question. The Trump Administration’s priorities may be more obviously reflected in whether the resources for bringing FCPA cases remain within the DOJ or if they have been diverted to other more pressing concerns. This includes the need for a clearer understanding of the number of trial lawyers in the FCPA Unit itself, the support of detailees to the Unit, and the capacity for bringing these cases at the 93 US Attorney’s Offices around the country.

[8] See Office of the Attorney General, “Guidelines for Investigations and Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)”, Sec. 1(A) (June 9, 2025).

[9] Id., Sec. 1(B).

[10] The memo also instructs prosecutors in conducting investigations and prosecutions under the Foreign Extortion Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1352, which criminalizes the “demand side” of foreign bribery, to consider whether specific and identifiable US entities or individuals have been harmed by foreign officials’ demands for bribes.

[11] Supra note 1.

[12] Supra note 7, Sec. 1(C).

[13] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[14]Supra note 7, Sec. 1(D).

[15] Id., quoting Executive Order §1.

[16] Id.

[17] Id.

[18] Id.

[19] Supra note 7, Sec. 2.

[20] Supra note 7 at 1.

[21] Jenner & Block, “Client Alert: The Case for Compliance: Why UK and EU Businesses Should Continue to Invest in Their Compliance Programs” (Mar. 24, 2025).

[22] Law 360 UK, “Ephgrave Eyes Covert Tactics To Fix Drop in Self-Reporting” (April 3, 2025).

[23] GOV.UK, “UK, France and Switzerland announce new anti-corruption alliance” (Mar. 20, 2025).

[24] International Anti-Corruption Prosecutorial Taskforce, Founding Statement (Mar. 20, 2025).

[25] 18 U.S.C. § 3292

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

ニュース

Event

Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference

On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.

July 1, 2026

Publications

In Employee Relations Law Journal: What Happens When ERISA Disability Deadlines Slip

Partner Joseph Torres along with Associates Emma O'Connor and Christopher LeWarne, authored an article for the Employee Relations Law Journal analyzing a significant Fourth Circuit decision with substantial consequences for ERISA disability plan administrators.

June 23, 2026

Publications

In Law360, Partner Samuel Feder Analyzes the Supreme Court's Ruling in FCC v. AT&T

Partner Sam Feder authored an article in Law360 examining the Supreme Court's June 4 decision in Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., which rejected AT&T's and Verizon's argument that the FCC's forfeiture process violates the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.

June 16, 2026