Proposed Amendments to the English Arbitration Act
The English Arbitration Act of 1996 is revered as underpinning the subsequent success of London as perhaps the world’s busiest arbitration venue. However, as the Act approaches its 30th anniversary, light touch reform is being considered.
- The law of the arbitration agreement: This is perhaps the most discussed reform to the Act. The current law in England & Wales for determining the proper law of an arbitration agreement was set in Supreme Court decision Enka v Chubb [2020]. However, the consensus is that the law remains unnecessarily complex. The Law Commission therefore wish to confirm that the law of the arbitration agreement is the law of the seat unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. This amendment has been welcomed by local practitioners.
- Confidentiality: Under English law, there is an implied duty to maintain arbitral confidentiality. This is a court developed concept established under the common law. It is not prescribed by the Act. This was therefore one area that was much discussed during the Law Commission consultation. Ultimately however, the Law Commission concluded that the Act should not codify the law of confidentiality.
- Jurisdictional challenges: Currently under the Act, challenges to the court on the basis that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction involve a full rehearing. The Law Commission has proposed that rights of challenge should be limited to a review by the court of the Tribunal’s decision. However, the Commission has suggested that this change be made via amendments to the rules of court rather than to the Act.
There are several other minor amendments being proposed. But as the above discussion demonstrates, there was little appetite for major change with most London arbitration practitioners feeling strongly that the Act works well as it is. When it passes into law the updated Act will therefore look much as it already does.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
- The law of the arbitration agreement: This is perhaps the most discussed reform to the Act. The current law in England & Wales for determining the proper law of an arbitration agreement was set in Supreme Court decision Enka v Chubb [2020]. However, the consensus is that the law remains unnecessarily complex. The Law Commission therefore wish to confirm that the law of the arbitration agreement is the law of the seat unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. This amendment has been welcomed by local practitioners.
- Confidentiality: Under English law, there is an implied duty to maintain arbitral confidentiality. This is a court developed concept established under the common law. It is not prescribed by the Act. This was therefore one area that was much discussed during the Law Commission consultation. Ultimately however, the Law Commission concluded that the Act should not codify the law of confidentiality.
- Jurisdictional challenges: Currently under the Act, challenges to the court on the basis that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction involve a full rehearing. The Law Commission has proposed that rights of challenge should be limited to a review by the court of the Tribunal’s decision. However, the Commission has suggested that this change be made via amendments to the rules of court rather than to the Act.
There are several other minor amendments being proposed. But as the above discussion demonstrates, there was little appetite for major change with most London arbitration practitioners feeling strongly that the Act works well as it is. When it passes into law the updated Act will therefore look much as it already does.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Lawyers
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
The English Arbitration Act of 1996 is revered as underpinning the subsequent success of London as perhaps the world’s busiest arbitration venue. However, as the Act approaches its 30th anniversary, light touch reform is being considered.
- The law of the arbitration agreement: This is perhaps the most discussed reform to the Act. The current law in England & Wales for determining the proper law of an arbitration agreement was set in Supreme Court decision Enka v Chubb [2020]. However, the consensus is that the law remains unnecessarily complex. The Law Commission therefore wish to confirm that the law of the arbitration agreement is the law of the seat unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. This amendment has been welcomed by local practitioners.
- Confidentiality: Under English law, there is an implied duty to maintain arbitral confidentiality. This is a court developed concept established under the common law. It is not prescribed by the Act. This was therefore one area that was much discussed during the Law Commission consultation. Ultimately however, the Law Commission concluded that the Act should not codify the law of confidentiality.
- Jurisdictional challenges: Currently under the Act, challenges to the court on the basis that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction involve a full rehearing. The Law Commission has proposed that rights of challenge should be limited to a review by the court of the Tribunal’s decision. However, the Commission has suggested that this change be made via amendments to the rules of court rather than to the Act.
There are several other minor amendments being proposed. But as the above discussion demonstrates, there was little appetite for major change with most London arbitration practitioners feeling strongly that the Act works well as it is. When it passes into law the updated Act will therefore look much as it already does.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
- The law of the arbitration agreement: This is perhaps the most discussed reform to the Act. The current law in England & Wales for determining the proper law of an arbitration agreement was set in Supreme Court decision Enka v Chubb [2020]. However, the consensus is that the law remains unnecessarily complex. The Law Commission therefore wish to confirm that the law of the arbitration agreement is the law of the seat unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. This amendment has been welcomed by local practitioners.
- Confidentiality: Under English law, there is an implied duty to maintain arbitral confidentiality. This is a court developed concept established under the common law. It is not prescribed by the Act. This was therefore one area that was much discussed during the Law Commission consultation. Ultimately however, the Law Commission concluded that the Act should not codify the law of confidentiality.
- Jurisdictional challenges: Currently under the Act, challenges to the court on the basis that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction involve a full rehearing. The Law Commission has proposed that rights of challenge should be limited to a review by the court of the Tribunal’s decision. However, the Commission has suggested that this change be made via amendments to the rules of court rather than to the Act.
There are several other minor amendments being proposed. But as the above discussion demonstrates, there was little appetite for major change with most London arbitration practitioners feeling strongly that the Act works well as it is. When it passes into law the updated Act will therefore look much as it already does.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Lawyers
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair
On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.
September 18, 2026
Publications
In American Banker, Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Weighs in on OCC's Handling of Fintech Bank Charter Applications
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon spoke with American Banker about how the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is approaching bank charter applications from fintechs, amid a growing wave of companies seeking charters from federal regulators.
August 18, 2026
Event
Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI
On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).
August 17, 2026
Publications
Special Counsel Kimberly Cook Featured in FCBA Member Spotlight
The Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA) featured Kimberly Cook in its Member Spotlight series.
August 13, 2026
Recognition
Three Jenner & Block Partners Named to Crain's New York Business' 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law List
Crain's New York Business recognized Jenner & Block Partners Anthony Barkow, Alison Stein, and Damian Williams among its 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law.
August 10, 2026