Non-Competition Agreements; FTC Rule Status

As we previously reported, on April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced their final rule banning most “non-competition” agreements. The FTC determined non-competition agreements were an unfair method of competition, and the final rule would prevent persons from entering into non-compete agreements with workers on or after September 4, 2024. With respect to existing noncompetes, the FTC’s final rule adopted two approaches based on seniority of the employee. For senior executives, existing noncompetes could remain in force, but noncompetes for other workers would no longer be enforceable.

On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in Ryan LLC et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, granted a motion for summary judgment by Ryan LLC and the US Chamber of Commerce and barred the FTC from enforcing its broad non-compete ban with nationwide effect. The Court held that the non-compete ban exceeded the FTC’s statutory authority and was arbitrary and capricious, violating the US Administrative Procedure Act.

The important takeaway is that, in light of the Ryan decision, if undisturbed by a higher court, employers across the country no longer will need to comply with the FTC’s non-compete ban or its requirement to provide notice to current and former employees with active noncompetes that those agreements are unenforceable by September 4, 2024. Employers, however, should stay abreast of the legal landscape as the Ryan decision will not be the final word on the issue. The FTC will almost certainly appeal the ruling.  Beyond Ryan, litigation on the rule remains pending in a few other federal courts.  Decisions in those other cases may well lead to their own appeals. In any event, the Supreme Court likely will take up this issue. We also caution that, with the federal rule in jeopardy, some states may step up their efforts to restrict (or further restrict) noncompetes through new legislation, regulations, or enforcement efforts. 

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Non-Competition Agreements; FTC Rule Status

As we previously reported, on April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced their final rule banning most “non-competition” agreements. The FTC determined non-competition agreements were an unfair method of competition, and the final rule would prevent persons from entering into non-compete agreements with workers on or after September 4, 2024. With respect to existing noncompetes, the FTC’s final rule adopted two approaches based on seniority of the employee. For senior executives, existing noncompetes could remain in force, but noncompetes for other workers would no longer be enforceable.

On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in Ryan LLC et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, granted a motion for summary judgment by Ryan LLC and the US Chamber of Commerce and barred the FTC from enforcing its broad non-compete ban with nationwide effect. The Court held that the non-compete ban exceeded the FTC’s statutory authority and was arbitrary and capricious, violating the US Administrative Procedure Act.

The important takeaway is that, in light of the Ryan decision, if undisturbed by a higher court, employers across the country no longer will need to comply with the FTC’s non-compete ban or its requirement to provide notice to current and former employees with active noncompetes that those agreements are unenforceable by September 4, 2024. Employers, however, should stay abreast of the legal landscape as the Ryan decision will not be the final word on the issue. The FTC will almost certainly appeal the ruling.  Beyond Ryan, litigation on the rule remains pending in a few other federal courts.  Decisions in those other cases may well lead to their own appeals. In any event, the Supreme Court likely will take up this issue. We also caution that, with the federal rule in jeopardy, some states may step up their efforts to restrict (or further restrict) noncompetes through new legislation, regulations, or enforcement efforts. 

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair

On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.

September 18, 2026

Event

Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI

On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).

August 17, 2026

Publications

In Law360, Trump Debarment Threat Calls for Targeted Defense Plan

Partners Ashley Callen and David Robbins authored an article for Law360 examining how entities should respond when suspension or debarment is threatened directly by the president, rather than initiated through the usual agency-driven process.

August 6, 2026

Publications

"DC Circuit Undercuts Congress's Subpoena Power: Important New Authority for Targets of Congressional Investigations," National Law Journal

In the National Law Journal, Congressional Investigations Co-Chair Emily Loeb, Special Counsel David Manners-Weber, and Associate Kate Mather examine a recent DC Circuit decision that gives fresh weight to 2020 Supreme Court dicta on common-law privileges in congressional investigations.

July 30, 2026