Non-Competition Agreements; FTC Rule Status

As we previously reported, on April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced their final rule banning most “non-competition” agreements. The FTC determined non-competition agreements were an unfair method of competition, and the final rule would prevent persons from entering into non-compete agreements with workers on or after September 4, 2024. With respect to existing noncompetes, the FTC’s final rule adopted two approaches based on seniority of the employee. For senior executives, existing noncompetes could remain in force, but noncompetes for other workers would no longer be enforceable.

On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in Ryan LLC et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, granted a motion for summary judgment by Ryan LLC and the US Chamber of Commerce and barred the FTC from enforcing its broad non-compete ban with nationwide effect. The Court held that the non-compete ban exceeded the FTC’s statutory authority and was arbitrary and capricious, violating the US Administrative Procedure Act.

The important takeaway is that, in light of the Ryan decision, if undisturbed by a higher court, employers across the country no longer will need to comply with the FTC’s non-compete ban or its requirement to provide notice to current and former employees with active noncompetes that those agreements are unenforceable by September 4, 2024. Employers, however, should stay abreast of the legal landscape as the Ryan decision will not be the final word on the issue. The FTC will almost certainly appeal the ruling.  Beyond Ryan, litigation on the rule remains pending in a few other federal courts.  Decisions in those other cases may well lead to their own appeals. In any event, the Supreme Court likely will take up this issue. We also caution that, with the federal rule in jeopardy, some states may step up their efforts to restrict (or further restrict) noncompetes through new legislation, regulations, or enforcement efforts. 

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Non-Competition Agreements; FTC Rule Status

As we previously reported, on April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced their final rule banning most “non-competition” agreements. The FTC determined non-competition agreements were an unfair method of competition, and the final rule would prevent persons from entering into non-compete agreements with workers on or after September 4, 2024. With respect to existing noncompetes, the FTC’s final rule adopted two approaches based on seniority of the employee. For senior executives, existing noncompetes could remain in force, but noncompetes for other workers would no longer be enforceable.

On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in Ryan LLC et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, granted a motion for summary judgment by Ryan LLC and the US Chamber of Commerce and barred the FTC from enforcing its broad non-compete ban with nationwide effect. The Court held that the non-compete ban exceeded the FTC’s statutory authority and was arbitrary and capricious, violating the US Administrative Procedure Act.

The important takeaway is that, in light of the Ryan decision, if undisturbed by a higher court, employers across the country no longer will need to comply with the FTC’s non-compete ban or its requirement to provide notice to current and former employees with active noncompetes that those agreements are unenforceable by September 4, 2024. Employers, however, should stay abreast of the legal landscape as the Ryan decision will not be the final word on the issue. The FTC will almost certainly appeal the ruling.  Beyond Ryan, litigation on the rule remains pending in a few other federal courts.  Decisions in those other cases may well lead to their own appeals. In any event, the Supreme Court likely will take up this issue. We also caution that, with the federal rule in jeopardy, some states may step up their efforts to restrict (or further restrict) noncompetes through new legislation, regulations, or enforcement efforts. 

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

News

In Billboard, Partner Precious Jacobs Discusses the Rise in Artist-Manager Litigation

Partner Precious S. Jacobs was featured in Billboard in “It’s Not Just Timbaland: Why Are So Many Artists Suing Their Managers Right Now?.” The article examines the recent wave of lawsuits between music artists and their managers and why that relationship is so prone to conflict.

November 12, 2026

Event

Partner Terri Mascherin to Speak at Illinois State Bar Association Seminar on Negotiation Ethics

On November 11, Partner Terri Mascherin will join a faculty panel for the Illinois State Bar Association (ISBA) continuing legal education (CLE) seminar “Negotiation Ethics: Winning Without Selling Your Soul.”

November 11, 2026

Publications

Partner Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in The Washington Post’s Health Brief

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block’s Congressional Investigations Practice, was quoted in The Washington Post’s Health Brief article examining how the 2026 midterm election results may reshape the health care policy landscape and the industry’s relationship with Washington.

November 10, 2026

Publications

Before You Sign: Key Contract Provisions for Tribes Considering Data Center Developments, ICT

Grace Signorelli-Cassady of Jenner & Block’s Native American Law Practice authored an opinion piece for ICT examining key contract provisions tribes should consider when approached about data center developments.

November 5, 2026

Publications

Jon Skladany and Kayvan Sadeghi Quoted on Fintech Investigation Readiness in Law360

Jenner & Block Partners Jon Skladany and Kayvan Sadeghi were quoted in a Law360 article examining how crypto and fintech companies are preparing for heightened congressional oversight following the 2026 midterm elections.

November 5, 2026

Publications

Partner Emily Loeb Discusses What the 2026 Midterms Mean for Congressional Oversight in the Financial Times

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block’s Congressional InvestigationsInvestigations Practice, was quoted in the Financial Times in an article examining how companies are preparing for congressional oversight as the new Congress takes shape following the 2026 midterm elections.

November 4, 2026