European Commission Decision at Odds with International Arbitration Practice
Many readers will be familiar with the Spanish renewables saga which centers on changes made by Spain to a renewable energy support scheme in 2007, which led to over 50 investment treaty arbitrations, including a number brought by Japanese investors. The European Commission has now invoked state aid to justify the non-payment of the resulting awards against Spain.
The EU courts have long refused the enforcement of these Spanish awards where they are held by EU investors on the basis that arbitration provision in intra-EU investment treaties (i.e., treaties between EU member states) are incompatible with EU law. Essentially, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has found that it was for the EU courts to decide questions of EU law that might arise in an investment treaty dispute between an EU state and an EU investor, which should not be left to arbitrators acting under investment treaties and outside the EU legal system. Hence, in the seminal Achmea case, they have found that arbitration agreements in intra-EU investment treaties, and any awards rendered thereon, are invalid.
Consistent with that approach, the European Commission has now determined that payment of an arbitration award requiring Spain to pay €101 million to two European entities in the Antin Infrastructure Group (incorporated in the Netherlands and Luxembourg respectively) would constitute unlawful state aid under EU rules. Following the principle established by the CJEU in Achmea and subsequently in Komstroy, under EU law the Antin arbitral award contravenes EU law, accordingly the European Commission has further concluded that payment of the award by Spain would improperly favor Antin and therefore distort competition in the European Union.
This puts EU law further at odds with international arbitration law and practice. Courts in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have shown themselves ready to enforce such awards notwithstanding the Achmea line of cases. Essentially these courts have concluded that Spain should be held to its agreement to arbitrate disputes with EU investors given in intra-EU investment treaties even though the European courts have subsequently found that such consent to arbitrate violates EU law. These courts have therefore ignored Achmea, leading to a number of high profile and novel enforcement battles, which are likely to continue for some time.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Consistent with that approach, the European Commission has now determined that payment of an arbitration award requiring Spain to pay €101 million to two European entities in the Antin Infrastructure Group (incorporated in the Netherlands and Luxembourg respectively) would constitute unlawful state aid under EU rules. Following the principle established by the CJEU in Achmea and subsequently in Komstroy, under EU law the Antin arbitral award contravenes EU law, accordingly the European Commission has further concluded that payment of the award by Spain would improperly favor Antin and therefore distort competition in the European Union.
This puts EU law further at odds with international arbitration law and practice. Courts in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have shown themselves ready to enforce such awards notwithstanding the Achmea line of cases. Essentially these courts have concluded that Spain should be held to its agreement to arbitrate disputes with EU investors given in intra-EU investment treaties even though the European courts have subsequently found that such consent to arbitrate violates EU law. These courts have therefore ignored Achmea, leading to a number of high profile and novel enforcement battles, which are likely to continue for some time.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Attorneys
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Many readers will be familiar with the Spanish renewables saga which centers on changes made by Spain to a renewable energy support scheme in 2007, which led to over 50 investment treaty arbitrations, including a number brought by Japanese investors. The European Commission has now invoked state aid to justify the non-payment of the resulting awards against Spain.
The EU courts have long refused the enforcement of these Spanish awards where they are held by EU investors on the basis that arbitration provision in intra-EU investment treaties (i.e., treaties between EU member states) are incompatible with EU law. Essentially, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has found that it was for the EU courts to decide questions of EU law that might arise in an investment treaty dispute between an EU state and an EU investor, which should not be left to arbitrators acting under investment treaties and outside the EU legal system. Hence, in the seminal Achmea case, they have found that arbitration agreements in intra-EU investment treaties, and any awards rendered thereon, are invalid.
Consistent with that approach, the European Commission has now determined that payment of an arbitration award requiring Spain to pay €101 million to two European entities in the Antin Infrastructure Group (incorporated in the Netherlands and Luxembourg respectively) would constitute unlawful state aid under EU rules. Following the principle established by the CJEU in Achmea and subsequently in Komstroy, under EU law the Antin arbitral award contravenes EU law, accordingly the European Commission has further concluded that payment of the award by Spain would improperly favor Antin and therefore distort competition in the European Union.
This puts EU law further at odds with international arbitration law and practice. Courts in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have shown themselves ready to enforce such awards notwithstanding the Achmea line of cases. Essentially these courts have concluded that Spain should be held to its agreement to arbitrate disputes with EU investors given in intra-EU investment treaties even though the European courts have subsequently found that such consent to arbitrate violates EU law. These courts have therefore ignored Achmea, leading to a number of high profile and novel enforcement battles, which are likely to continue for some time.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Consistent with that approach, the European Commission has now determined that payment of an arbitration award requiring Spain to pay €101 million to two European entities in the Antin Infrastructure Group (incorporated in the Netherlands and Luxembourg respectively) would constitute unlawful state aid under EU rules. Following the principle established by the CJEU in Achmea and subsequently in Komstroy, under EU law the Antin arbitral award contravenes EU law, accordingly the European Commission has further concluded that payment of the award by Spain would improperly favor Antin and therefore distort competition in the European Union.
This puts EU law further at odds with international arbitration law and practice. Courts in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have shown themselves ready to enforce such awards notwithstanding the Achmea line of cases. Essentially these courts have concluded that Spain should be held to its agreement to arbitrate disputes with EU investors given in intra-EU investment treaties even though the European courts have subsequently found that such consent to arbitrate violates EU law. These courts have therefore ignored Achmea, leading to a number of high profile and novel enforcement battles, which are likely to continue for some time.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Attorneys
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026
Publications
In Employee Relations Law Journal: What Happens When ERISA Disability Deadlines Slip
Partner Joseph Torres along with Associates Emma O'Connor and Christopher LeWarne, authored an article for the Employee Relations Law Journal analyzing a significant Fourth Circuit decision with substantial consequences for ERISA disability plan administrators.
June 23, 2026
Event
Jenner & Block Partners to Speak at Council on Governmental Relations Conference
On June 11, Partners Mike Vernick, Katie Wynbrandt, and Betsy Henthorne will speak on a panel at the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR) meeting.
June 11, 2026