Client Alert: The Federal Trade Commission Intent on Regulating “Commercial Surveillance”
The ANPR poses a series of open-ended questions about the need for new privacy rules in today’s “commercial surveillance economy,” an ever-expanding commercial ecosystem on the internet where businesses monitor consumers’ online activities and collect and monetize their personal data, often using automated and algorithm-based processes.
The ANPR seeks comments on a wide range of questions, including:
- The harm of commercial surveillance activities and lax data security practices on consumers and
children; - How the FTC should balance costs and benefits in regulating commercial surveillance and data
security; - Whether the FTC should commence rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security, and what types of requirements the FTC should impose;
- How prevalent are algorithmic errors in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC may regulate automated decision-making systems and reduce the harmful effects of algorithmic errors;
- How widespread is algorithmic discrimination in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC should address algorithmic discrimination;
- Whether consumer consent remains effective or viable as a tool in regulating companies’ commercial surveillance and data security practices;
- How to improve effective notice, transparency, and disclosure of companies’ commercial surveillance practices; Consumer remedies; and
- How any rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security should account for changes in business advertising models and commercial surveillance practices.
The FTC opened the ANPR with the concern that consumers share “a wide range of personal information about themselves to companies,” often without realizing they are doing so, and that an “elaborate and lucrative market” enables businesses to use this information to individually target goods and services to consumers. It then seeks public comment on harms relating to lax data security standards, including identity theft, fraud, and cyber-attacks on national critical infrastructure; the potential for abusive uses of consumer data, such as to automate the targeting of fraudulent products and services to vulnerable consumers, or enable stalking, cyber bullying, and distribution of harmful material; and harms to children, including from services that collect data about and are addictive to children. Additionally, the agency asks about practices that require consumers to share their data in order to get a service or that change privacy practices in material ways after a consumer has signed up for service. Furthermore, the FTC requests information about discrimination and inaccuracy in automated decision-making systems, including the algorithms that support them. Lastly, the commission asks questions reflecting its growing interest in “dark pattern” practices or efforts to manipulate consumers into sharing personal information.
The FTC adopted the ANPR on a 3-2 vote, with Commissioners Wilson and Phillips dissenting and arguing that Congress should regulate privacy through a comprehensive federal privacy law. In late July, the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce sent the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (“ADPPA”) to the full House for a vote. If passed by both the House and Senate, ADPPA would establish the first comprehensive federal data privacy framework. FTC Chair Khan noted that if Congress adopts a federal privacy law, the commission will re-assess the need for
trade regulation rules on commercial surveillance and data security. Commissioners Slaughter and Bedoya issued statements supporting both FTC and Congressional action on privacy.
Comments to the ANPR will be due 60 days after the ANPR is published in the Federal Register. The FTC will host a virtual Public Forum on the ANPR, including both panel discussions and a public comment session, on September 8, 2022.
The ANPR is the first step in the FTC’s process for issuing trade regulation rules under Section 18(a) (1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.[1] Based on the public record developed in response to the ANPR, the FTC will decide whether—as is expected—to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), proposing specific rules to regulate commercial data collection and data security practices. Any NPRM would be followed by a public comment period before adoption of final rules.
The ANPR poses a series of open-ended questions about the need for new privacy rules in today’s “commercial surveillance economy,” an ever-expanding commercial ecosystem on the internet where businesses monitor consumers’ online activities and collect and monetize their personal data, often using automated and algorithm-based processes.
The ANPR seeks comments on a wide range of questions, including:
- The harm of commercial surveillance activities and lax data security practices on consumers and
children; - How the FTC should balance costs and benefits in regulating commercial surveillance and data
security; - Whether the FTC should commence rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security, and what types of requirements the FTC should impose;
- How prevalent are algorithmic errors in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC may regulate automated decision-making systems and reduce the harmful effects of algorithmic errors;
- How widespread is algorithmic discrimination in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC should address algorithmic discrimination;
- Whether consumer consent remains effective or viable as a tool in regulating companies’ commercial surveillance and data security practices;
- How to improve effective notice, transparency, and disclosure of companies’ commercial surveillance practices; Consumer remedies; and
- How any rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security should account for changes in business advertising models and commercial surveillance practices.
The FTC opened the ANPR with the concern that consumers share “a wide range of personal information about themselves to companies,” often without realizing they are doing so, and that an “elaborate and lucrative market” enables businesses to use this information to individually target goods and services to consumers. It then seeks public comment on harms relating to lax data security standards, including identity theft, fraud, and cyber-attacks on national critical infrastructure; the potential for abusive uses of consumer data, such as to automate the targeting of fraudulent products and services to vulnerable consumers, or enable stalking, cyber bullying, and distribution of harmful material; and harms to children, including from services that collect data about and are addictive to children. Additionally, the agency asks about practices that require consumers to share their data in order to get a service or that change privacy practices in material ways after a consumer has signed up for service. Furthermore, the FTC requests information about discrimination and inaccuracy in automated decision-making systems, including the algorithms that support them. Lastly, the commission asks questions reflecting its growing interest in “dark pattern” practices or efforts to manipulate consumers into sharing personal information.
The FTC adopted the ANPR on a 3-2 vote, with Commissioners Wilson and Phillips dissenting and arguing that Congress should regulate privacy through a comprehensive federal privacy law. In late July, the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce sent the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (“ADPPA”) to the full House for a vote. If passed by both the House and Senate, ADPPA would establish the first comprehensive federal data privacy framework. FTC Chair Khan noted that if Congress adopts a federal privacy law, the commission will re-assess the need for
trade regulation rules on commercial surveillance and data security. Commissioners Slaughter and Bedoya issued statements supporting both FTC and Congressional action on privacy.
Comments to the ANPR will be due 60 days after the ANPR is published in the Federal Register. The FTC will host a virtual Public Forum on the ANPR, including both panel discussions and a public comment session, on September 8, 2022.
The ANPR is the first step in the FTC’s process for issuing trade regulation rules under Section 18(a) (1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.[1] Based on the public record developed in response to the ANPR, the FTC will decide whether—as is expected—to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), proposing specific rules to regulate commercial data collection and data security practices. Any NPRM would be followed by a public comment period before adoption of final rules.
[1] 15 U.S. Code § 57a(a)(1)(B)
Footnotes
[1] 15 U.S. Code § 57a(a)(1)(B)
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
The ANPR poses a series of open-ended questions about the need for new privacy rules in today’s “commercial surveillance economy,” an ever-expanding commercial ecosystem on the internet where businesses monitor consumers’ online activities and collect and monetize their personal data, often using automated and algorithm-based processes.
The ANPR seeks comments on a wide range of questions, including:
- The harm of commercial surveillance activities and lax data security practices on consumers and
children; - How the FTC should balance costs and benefits in regulating commercial surveillance and data
security; - Whether the FTC should commence rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security, and what types of requirements the FTC should impose;
- How prevalent are algorithmic errors in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC may regulate automated decision-making systems and reduce the harmful effects of algorithmic errors;
- How widespread is algorithmic discrimination in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC should address algorithmic discrimination;
- Whether consumer consent remains effective or viable as a tool in regulating companies’ commercial surveillance and data security practices;
- How to improve effective notice, transparency, and disclosure of companies’ commercial surveillance practices; Consumer remedies; and
- How any rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security should account for changes in business advertising models and commercial surveillance practices.
The FTC opened the ANPR with the concern that consumers share “a wide range of personal information about themselves to companies,” often without realizing they are doing so, and that an “elaborate and lucrative market” enables businesses to use this information to individually target goods and services to consumers. It then seeks public comment on harms relating to lax data security standards, including identity theft, fraud, and cyber-attacks on national critical infrastructure; the potential for abusive uses of consumer data, such as to automate the targeting of fraudulent products and services to vulnerable consumers, or enable stalking, cyber bullying, and distribution of harmful material; and harms to children, including from services that collect data about and are addictive to children. Additionally, the agency asks about practices that require consumers to share their data in order to get a service or that change privacy practices in material ways after a consumer has signed up for service. Furthermore, the FTC requests information about discrimination and inaccuracy in automated decision-making systems, including the algorithms that support them. Lastly, the commission asks questions reflecting its growing interest in “dark pattern” practices or efforts to manipulate consumers into sharing personal information.
The FTC adopted the ANPR on a 3-2 vote, with Commissioners Wilson and Phillips dissenting and arguing that Congress should regulate privacy through a comprehensive federal privacy law. In late July, the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce sent the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (“ADPPA”) to the full House for a vote. If passed by both the House and Senate, ADPPA would establish the first comprehensive federal data privacy framework. FTC Chair Khan noted that if Congress adopts a federal privacy law, the commission will re-assess the need for
trade regulation rules on commercial surveillance and data security. Commissioners Slaughter and Bedoya issued statements supporting both FTC and Congressional action on privacy.
Comments to the ANPR will be due 60 days after the ANPR is published in the Federal Register. The FTC will host a virtual Public Forum on the ANPR, including both panel discussions and a public comment session, on September 8, 2022.
The ANPR is the first step in the FTC’s process for issuing trade regulation rules under Section 18(a) (1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.[1] Based on the public record developed in response to the ANPR, the FTC will decide whether—as is expected—to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), proposing specific rules to regulate commercial data collection and data security practices. Any NPRM would be followed by a public comment period before adoption of final rules.
The ANPR poses a series of open-ended questions about the need for new privacy rules in today’s “commercial surveillance economy,” an ever-expanding commercial ecosystem on the internet where businesses monitor consumers’ online activities and collect and monetize their personal data, often using automated and algorithm-based processes.
The ANPR seeks comments on a wide range of questions, including:
- The harm of commercial surveillance activities and lax data security practices on consumers and
children; - How the FTC should balance costs and benefits in regulating commercial surveillance and data
security; - Whether the FTC should commence rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security, and what types of requirements the FTC should impose;
- How prevalent are algorithmic errors in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC may regulate automated decision-making systems and reduce the harmful effects of algorithmic errors;
- How widespread is algorithmic discrimination in automated decision-making systems and how the FTC should address algorithmic discrimination;
- Whether consumer consent remains effective or viable as a tool in regulating companies’ commercial surveillance and data security practices;
- How to improve effective notice, transparency, and disclosure of companies’ commercial surveillance practices; Consumer remedies; and
- How any rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security should account for changes in business advertising models and commercial surveillance practices.
The FTC opened the ANPR with the concern that consumers share “a wide range of personal information about themselves to companies,” often without realizing they are doing so, and that an “elaborate and lucrative market” enables businesses to use this information to individually target goods and services to consumers. It then seeks public comment on harms relating to lax data security standards, including identity theft, fraud, and cyber-attacks on national critical infrastructure; the potential for abusive uses of consumer data, such as to automate the targeting of fraudulent products and services to vulnerable consumers, or enable stalking, cyber bullying, and distribution of harmful material; and harms to children, including from services that collect data about and are addictive to children. Additionally, the agency asks about practices that require consumers to share their data in order to get a service or that change privacy practices in material ways after a consumer has signed up for service. Furthermore, the FTC requests information about discrimination and inaccuracy in automated decision-making systems, including the algorithms that support them. Lastly, the commission asks questions reflecting its growing interest in “dark pattern” practices or efforts to manipulate consumers into sharing personal information.
The FTC adopted the ANPR on a 3-2 vote, with Commissioners Wilson and Phillips dissenting and arguing that Congress should regulate privacy through a comprehensive federal privacy law. In late July, the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce sent the American Data Privacy and Protection Act (“ADPPA”) to the full House for a vote. If passed by both the House and Senate, ADPPA would establish the first comprehensive federal data privacy framework. FTC Chair Khan noted that if Congress adopts a federal privacy law, the commission will re-assess the need for
trade regulation rules on commercial surveillance and data security. Commissioners Slaughter and Bedoya issued statements supporting both FTC and Congressional action on privacy.
Comments to the ANPR will be due 60 days after the ANPR is published in the Federal Register. The FTC will host a virtual Public Forum on the ANPR, including both panel discussions and a public comment session, on September 8, 2022.
The ANPR is the first step in the FTC’s process for issuing trade regulation rules under Section 18(a) (1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act.[1] Based on the public record developed in response to the ANPR, the FTC will decide whether—as is expected—to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), proposing specific rules to regulate commercial data collection and data security practices. Any NPRM would be followed by a public comment period before adoption of final rules.
[1] 15 U.S. Code § 57a(a)(1)(B)
Footnotes
[1] 15 U.S. Code § 57a(a)(1)(B)
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair
On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.
September 18, 2026
Publications
In American Banker, Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Weighs in on OCC's Handling of Fintech Bank Charter Applications
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon spoke with American Banker about how the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is approaching bank charter applications from fintechs, amid a growing wave of companies seeking charters from federal regulators.
August 18, 2026
Event
Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI
On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).
August 17, 2026
Publications
Special Counsel Kimberly Cook Featured in FCBA Member Spotlight
The Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA) featured Kimberly Cook in its Member Spotlight series.
August 13, 2026
Recognition
Three Jenner & Block Partners Named to Crain's New York Business' 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law List
Crain's New York Business recognized Jenner & Block Partners Anthony Barkow, Alison Stein, and Damian Williams among its 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law.
August 10, 2026
