On Behalf of St. Luke’s Health System, Jenner & Block Files New Complaint to Resolve Conflict Between Idaho’s Abortion Law and EMTALA

Today, Jenner & Block, on behalf of St. Luke’s Health System and in collaboration with Stoel Rives, filed a lawsuit with the US District Court for the District of Idaho to resolve the conflict between Idaho’s state abortion law and the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).

The United States is currently pursuing a related complaint against the State of Idaho over this issue. The upcoming change in federal administration may not pursue that complaint, which could result in the dissolution of the injunction that currently safeguards the health of pregnant women presenting to Idaho emergency departments with an emergency medical condition.

To prevent this outcome, St. Luke’s has filed a complaint and a motion for injunctive relief to maintain the same protections currently in place. Without this injunction, patients, physicians, and other licensed healthcare professionals will be harmed, as was the case in early 2024 when the injunction was temporarily lifted pending review by the US Supreme Court.

"St. Luke’s has seen firsthand the need for patients to have the full range of emergency medical care available to them in Idaho, and I am grateful for their commitment to ensuring that women across the state receive the care they need,” said Partner Lindsay Harrison

EMTALA requires hospitals that receive Medicare funding to offer stabilizing treatment to protect a pregnant woman’s health, including, in rare cases, the termination of a pregnancy. In contrast, Idaho’s Defense of Life Act only allows a physician to offer stabilizing care in the form of terminating a pregnancy if it is necessary to prevent the pregnant woman’s death. Physicians are not able to comply with both laws when the pregnant woman’s emergency condition threatens severe health consequences short of death. The lawsuit seeks to rectify this conflict so that federal law preempts state law, consistent with the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.

In addition to Lindsay, the Jenner team includes Partner Jessica Ring Amunson, Associates Sophie Montgomery and Ruby Giaquinto, and Junior Paralegal Kenyon North. 

In March 2024, Lindsay and Associate Maria LaBella filed an amicus brief in the US Supreme Court on behalf of St. Luke’s, asking the Court to find that Idaho’s near-total ban on abortions is preempted by EMTALA. In December 2024, Lindsay argued on behalf of St. Luke’s before the 9th Circuit, sitting en banc, in support of the United States.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

On Behalf of St. Luke’s Health System, Jenner & Block Files New Complaint to Resolve Conflict Between Idaho’s Abortion Law and EMTALA

Today, Jenner & Block, on behalf of St. Luke’s Health System and in collaboration with Stoel Rives, filed a lawsuit with the US District Court for the District of Idaho to resolve the conflict between Idaho’s state abortion law and the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).

The United States is currently pursuing a related complaint against the State of Idaho over this issue. The upcoming change in federal administration may not pursue that complaint, which could result in the dissolution of the injunction that currently safeguards the health of pregnant women presenting to Idaho emergency departments with an emergency medical condition.

To prevent this outcome, St. Luke’s has filed a complaint and a motion for injunctive relief to maintain the same protections currently in place. Without this injunction, patients, physicians, and other licensed healthcare professionals will be harmed, as was the case in early 2024 when the injunction was temporarily lifted pending review by the US Supreme Court.

"St. Luke’s has seen firsthand the need for patients to have the full range of emergency medical care available to them in Idaho, and I am grateful for their commitment to ensuring that women across the state receive the care they need,” said Partner Lindsay Harrison

EMTALA requires hospitals that receive Medicare funding to offer stabilizing treatment to protect a pregnant woman’s health, including, in rare cases, the termination of a pregnancy. In contrast, Idaho’s Defense of Life Act only allows a physician to offer stabilizing care in the form of terminating a pregnancy if it is necessary to prevent the pregnant woman’s death. Physicians are not able to comply with both laws when the pregnant woman’s emergency condition threatens severe health consequences short of death. The lawsuit seeks to rectify this conflict so that federal law preempts state law, consistent with the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.

In addition to Lindsay, the Jenner team includes Partner Jessica Ring Amunson, Associates Sophie Montgomery and Ruby Giaquinto, and Junior Paralegal Kenyon North. 

In March 2024, Lindsay and Associate Maria LaBella filed an amicus brief in the US Supreme Court on behalf of St. Luke’s, asking the Court to find that Idaho’s near-total ban on abortions is preempted by EMTALA. In December 2024, Lindsay argued on behalf of St. Luke’s before the 9th Circuit, sitting en banc, in support of the United States.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Podcasts

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.

July 15, 2026

Event

Partner Suedeen Kelly to Speak at ABA SEER's 34th Fall Conference

On Thursday, October 15, Partner Suedeen Kelly will speak on a panel at the American Bar Association's Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources (ABA SEER) 34th Fall Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

October 15, 2026

Publications

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report

Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

July 14, 2026

Publications

Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.

July 7, 2026

Publications

In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision

Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.

July 1, 2026