New York Court of Appeals Delivers Victory to Clients Supporting Independent Redistricting Effort
News
December 12, 2023
The New York Court of Appeals sided with three clients who belong to the state’s Independent Redistricting Commission (IRC) and ruled that the IRC should fulfil its constitutionally mandated duty. In its opinion, the four-judge majority held that the IRC should submit to the legislature a new congressional redistricting plan by February 28, 2024.
Partner Jessie Amunson argued the case on behalf of IRC Chairperson Ken Jenkins and Commissioners Frazier and Cuevas-Molina. In a statement, she said: “Today’s decision aligns with the wishes of New Yorkers who voted almost 10 years ago for the specific mechanism to provide fair maps: the Independent Redistricting Commission. We are delighted the IRC can now fulfill their constitutionally mandated role of presenting the legislature with proposed congressional districts before the next election cycle.”
Chief Judge Wilson, writing for the majority, described the “tortured history” of voting in New York. The 10-member IRC was created in 2014 by voters’ amendment to the state’s Constitution. Its mission is to usher in “a new era of bipartisanship and transparency” in New York elections.
The IRC’s first opportunity to carry out its duties came after the 2020 census. But in January 2022, the state legislature rejected the IRC’s submitted maps. The IRC was then obligated to submit a second set. Deadlocked, the IRC never did. The legislature composed its own congressional and senate maps. Litigation immediately followed, with proponents of the legislative maps arguing that those maps trumped the IRC because the commission failed to deliver its maps on time.
In June 2023, the Third Department of the New York Supreme Court's Appellate Division held that the IRC should reconvene to fulfill its duty. IRC member Ross Brady and others appealed to the state’s high court.
In affirming the Third Department’s decision, Judge Wilson wrote that the state’s Constitution explicitly places a limitation on court-created maps. “The Constitution clearly establishes the IRC process as predominant over court-drawn districts,” he explained.
In addition to Jessie, the team included Partners Sam Hirsch and Jake Alderdice, Associate Allison Douglis, Manager of Docketing Services Na'eem Conway, Senior Paralegal Cheryl Olson, and Legal Assistant Sheree Anyiam.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
December 12, 2023
The New York Court of Appeals sided with three clients who belong to the state’s Independent Redistricting Commission (IRC) and ruled that the IRC should fulfil its constitutionally mandated duty. In its opinion, the four-judge majority held that the IRC should submit to the legislature a new congressional redistricting plan by February 28, 2024.
Partner Jessie Amunson argued the case on behalf of IRC Chairperson Ken Jenkins and Commissioners Frazier and Cuevas-Molina. In a statement, she said: “Today’s decision aligns with the wishes of New Yorkers who voted almost 10 years ago for the specific mechanism to provide fair maps: the Independent Redistricting Commission. We are delighted the IRC can now fulfill their constitutionally mandated role of presenting the legislature with proposed congressional districts before the next election cycle.”
Chief Judge Wilson, writing for the majority, described the “tortured history” of voting in New York. The 10-member IRC was created in 2014 by voters’ amendment to the state’s Constitution. Its mission is to usher in “a new era of bipartisanship and transparency” in New York elections.
The IRC’s first opportunity to carry out its duties came after the 2020 census. But in January 2022, the state legislature rejected the IRC’s submitted maps. The IRC was then obligated to submit a second set. Deadlocked, the IRC never did. The legislature composed its own congressional and senate maps. Litigation immediately followed, with proponents of the legislative maps arguing that those maps trumped the IRC because the commission failed to deliver its maps on time.
In June 2023, the Third Department of the New York Supreme Court's Appellate Division held that the IRC should reconvene to fulfill its duty. IRC member Ross Brady and others appealed to the state’s high court.
In affirming the Third Department’s decision, Judge Wilson wrote that the state’s Constitution explicitly places a limitation on court-created maps. “The Constitution clearly establishes the IRC process as predominant over court-drawn districts,” he explained.
In addition to Jessie, the team included Partners Sam Hirsch and Jake Alderdice, Associate Allison Douglis, Manager of Docketing Services Na'eem Conway, Senior Paralegal Cheryl Olson, and Legal Assistant Sheree Anyiam.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Podcasts
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.
July 15, 2026
Publications
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report
Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
July 14, 2026
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026