Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court to Protect the Federal Right to Emergency Abortion Care in Idaho
News
April 24, 2024
On March 14, a Jenner & Block team filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of St. Luke’s Health System, the only Idaho-based, not-for-profit, community-owned and community-led health system, asking the Court to find that Idaho’s near-total ban on abortions is preempted by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). Under EMTALA, Medicare-funded hospitals—like St. Luke’s—are required to treat anyone who comes to the ER experiencing an emergency medical condition with stabilizing care, including in some situations, by terminating a pregnancy. Idaho has suggested that EMTALA does not apply in Idaho, which would mean that physicians can be criminally prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy even where necessary to stabilize the health of the pregnant patient.
"The stakes are immeasurably high in this case. Idaho law prohibits health care providers from doing what is medically necessary to stabilize their pregnant patients in a health emergency. This has severe consequences for Idaho’s patients, their families, and physicians. We hope the Supreme Court will recognize that in the narrow set of circumstances where terminating a pregnancy is necessary to protect the health of a patient, Idaho cannot criminalize it in light of conflicting federal law.” Said Partner Lindsay Harrison.
As the largest private employer in Idaho, St. Luke’s physicians and nurses treat patients millions of times each year. In 2022 alone, they treated patients in over one million hospital visits, 224,000 emergency department visits, and 1.9 million clinic visits. The brief offers insight into what transpires in Idaho’s emergency departments and how Idaho Code § 18-622 significantly impacts patient care.
The brief underscored that “because Idaho Code § 18-622 creates a direct conflict with EMTALA, it places hospitals, including St. Luke’s, in the precarious position of risking the criminal liability and medical licenses of their providers simply for complying with federal law.”
“While § 18-622 prohibits termination except to prevent the death of the mother, EMTALA requires providers to offer stabilizing care even when an emergency medical condition poses severe health risks short of death,” the brief points out.
“As a result, physicians in Idaho, and the institutions in which they work, are faced with an irreconcilable conflict,” the brief concludes.
The Jenner team includes Partner Lindsay Harrison and Associate Maria LaBella.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in this case on April 24.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
April 24, 2024
On March 14, a Jenner & Block team filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of St. Luke’s Health System, the only Idaho-based, not-for-profit, community-owned and community-led health system, asking the Court to find that Idaho’s near-total ban on abortions is preempted by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). Under EMTALA, Medicare-funded hospitals—like St. Luke’s—are required to treat anyone who comes to the ER experiencing an emergency medical condition with stabilizing care, including in some situations, by terminating a pregnancy. Idaho has suggested that EMTALA does not apply in Idaho, which would mean that physicians can be criminally prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy even where necessary to stabilize the health of the pregnant patient.
"The stakes are immeasurably high in this case. Idaho law prohibits health care providers from doing what is medically necessary to stabilize their pregnant patients in a health emergency. This has severe consequences for Idaho’s patients, their families, and physicians. We hope the Supreme Court will recognize that in the narrow set of circumstances where terminating a pregnancy is necessary to protect the health of a patient, Idaho cannot criminalize it in light of conflicting federal law.” Said Partner Lindsay Harrison.
As the largest private employer in Idaho, St. Luke’s physicians and nurses treat patients millions of times each year. In 2022 alone, they treated patients in over one million hospital visits, 224,000 emergency department visits, and 1.9 million clinic visits. The brief offers insight into what transpires in Idaho’s emergency departments and how Idaho Code § 18-622 significantly impacts patient care.
The brief underscored that “because Idaho Code § 18-622 creates a direct conflict with EMTALA, it places hospitals, including St. Luke’s, in the precarious position of risking the criminal liability and medical licenses of their providers simply for complying with federal law.”
“While § 18-622 prohibits termination except to prevent the death of the mother, EMTALA requires providers to offer stabilizing care even when an emergency medical condition poses severe health risks short of death,” the brief points out.
“As a result, physicians in Idaho, and the institutions in which they work, are faced with an irreconcilable conflict,” the brief concludes.
The Jenner team includes Partner Lindsay Harrison and Associate Maria LaBella.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in this case on April 24.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Podcasts
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.
July 15, 2026
Publications
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report
Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
July 14, 2026
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026