Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court to Protect the Federal Right to Emergency Abortion Care in Idaho
News
April 24, 2024
On March 14, a Jenner & Block team filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of St. Luke’s Health System, the only Idaho-based, not-for-profit, community-owned and community-led health system, asking the Court to find that Idaho’s near-total ban on abortions is preempted by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). Under EMTALA, Medicare-funded hospitals—like St. Luke’s—are required to treat anyone who comes to the ER experiencing an emergency medical condition with stabilizing care, including in some situations, by terminating a pregnancy. Idaho has suggested that EMTALA does not apply in Idaho, which would mean that physicians can be criminally prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy even where necessary to stabilize the health of the pregnant patient.
"The stakes are immeasurably high in this case. Idaho law prohibits health care providers from doing what is medically necessary to stabilize their pregnant patients in a health emergency. This has severe consequences for Idaho’s patients, their families, and physicians. We hope the Supreme Court will recognize that in the narrow set of circumstances where terminating a pregnancy is necessary to protect the health of a patient, Idaho cannot criminalize it in light of conflicting federal law.” Said Partner Lindsay Harrison.
As the largest private employer in Idaho, St. Luke’s physicians and nurses treat patients millions of times each year. In 2022 alone, they treated patients in over one million hospital visits, 224,000 emergency department visits, and 1.9 million clinic visits. The brief offers insight into what transpires in Idaho’s emergency departments and how Idaho Code § 18-622 significantly impacts patient care.
The brief underscored that “because Idaho Code § 18-622 creates a direct conflict with EMTALA, it places hospitals, including St. Luke’s, in the precarious position of risking the criminal liability and medical licenses of their providers simply for complying with federal law.”
“While § 18-622 prohibits termination except to prevent the death of the mother, EMTALA requires providers to offer stabilizing care even when an emergency medical condition poses severe health risks short of death,” the brief points out.
“As a result, physicians in Idaho, and the institutions in which they work, are faced with an irreconcilable conflict,” the brief concludes.
The Jenner team includes Partner Lindsay Harrison and Associate Maria LaBella.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in this case on April 24.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
April 24, 2024
On March 14, a Jenner & Block team filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of St. Luke’s Health System, the only Idaho-based, not-for-profit, community-owned and community-led health system, asking the Court to find that Idaho’s near-total ban on abortions is preempted by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). Under EMTALA, Medicare-funded hospitals—like St. Luke’s—are required to treat anyone who comes to the ER experiencing an emergency medical condition with stabilizing care, including in some situations, by terminating a pregnancy. Idaho has suggested that EMTALA does not apply in Idaho, which would mean that physicians can be criminally prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy even where necessary to stabilize the health of the pregnant patient.
"The stakes are immeasurably high in this case. Idaho law prohibits health care providers from doing what is medically necessary to stabilize their pregnant patients in a health emergency. This has severe consequences for Idaho’s patients, their families, and physicians. We hope the Supreme Court will recognize that in the narrow set of circumstances where terminating a pregnancy is necessary to protect the health of a patient, Idaho cannot criminalize it in light of conflicting federal law.” Said Partner Lindsay Harrison.
As the largest private employer in Idaho, St. Luke’s physicians and nurses treat patients millions of times each year. In 2022 alone, they treated patients in over one million hospital visits, 224,000 emergency department visits, and 1.9 million clinic visits. The brief offers insight into what transpires in Idaho’s emergency departments and how Idaho Code § 18-622 significantly impacts patient care.
The brief underscored that “because Idaho Code § 18-622 creates a direct conflict with EMTALA, it places hospitals, including St. Luke’s, in the precarious position of risking the criminal liability and medical licenses of their providers simply for complying with federal law.”
“While § 18-622 prohibits termination except to prevent the death of the mother, EMTALA requires providers to offer stabilizing care even when an emergency medical condition poses severe health risks short of death,” the brief points out.
“As a result, physicians in Idaho, and the institutions in which they work, are faced with an irreconcilable conflict,” the brief concludes.
The Jenner team includes Partner Lindsay Harrison and Associate Maria LaBella.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in this case on April 24.
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026