Amicus Brief Argues Texas Anti-Abortion Law is Designed to Impose Overwhelming Costs on Defendants

On February 16, 2023, a Jenner & Block team filed a pro bono amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a case challenging Senate Bill 8 in Texas. The law bans abortion once cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo, which typically occurs around the sixth week of pregnancy, and deputizes private individuals to sue anyone who performs or “aids and abets” the performance of an abortion. The minimum reward for a successful suit is $10,000.

The brief argues that SB 8 is designed to encourage costly duplicative litigation and create conflicting claims to a limited fund. “Under SB 8, any person who performs or aids in the performance of an abortion in violation of the statue is subject to suit by any person in Texas state court, regardless of whether they have a personal stake in the abortion performed,” the brief says.

Congress devised a tool for federal courts to resolve such disputes: interpleader. This procedural device enables courts to consolidate conflicting claims in a single proceeding. According to the brief, “the turmoil unleashed by SB 8’s private enforcement scheme demands a uniform method of dispute resolution.” Federal interpleader meets that demand by “protecting stakeholders from the unjust expense of defending multiple lawsuits and preserving judicial resources through the efficient resolution of conflicting claims.”

In Braid v. Stilley, three strangers from three different states sued Dr. Braid in state court to collect statutory damages for an abortion he performed in 2021. Dr. Braid then filed a federal interpleader action in Illinois, asserting that SB 8 violates his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights as well as his First Amendment rights to free speech and petition.

The team—which included Partner Lindsay Harrison, Associate Leslie Bruce, and Law Clerk Danny Li—filed the brief on behalf of three law professors with expertise in civil procedure, complex litigation, and civil remedies.

Related Attorneys

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Amicus Brief Argues Texas Anti-Abortion Law is Designed to Impose Overwhelming Costs on Defendants

On February 16, 2023, a Jenner & Block team filed a pro bono amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a case challenging Senate Bill 8 in Texas. The law bans abortion once cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo, which typically occurs around the sixth week of pregnancy, and deputizes private individuals to sue anyone who performs or “aids and abets” the performance of an abortion. The minimum reward for a successful suit is $10,000.

The brief argues that SB 8 is designed to encourage costly duplicative litigation and create conflicting claims to a limited fund. “Under SB 8, any person who performs or aids in the performance of an abortion in violation of the statue is subject to suit by any person in Texas state court, regardless of whether they have a personal stake in the abortion performed,” the brief says.

Congress devised a tool for federal courts to resolve such disputes: interpleader. This procedural device enables courts to consolidate conflicting claims in a single proceeding. According to the brief, “the turmoil unleashed by SB 8’s private enforcement scheme demands a uniform method of dispute resolution.” Federal interpleader meets that demand by “protecting stakeholders from the unjust expense of defending multiple lawsuits and preserving judicial resources through the efficient resolution of conflicting claims.”

In Braid v. Stilley, three strangers from three different states sued Dr. Braid in state court to collect statutory damages for an abortion he performed in 2021. Dr. Braid then filed a federal interpleader action in Illinois, asserting that SB 8 violates his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights as well as his First Amendment rights to free speech and petition.

The team—which included Partner Lindsay Harrison, Associate Leslie Bruce, and Law Clerk Danny Li—filed the brief on behalf of three law professors with expertise in civil procedure, complex litigation, and civil remedies.

Related Attorneys

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair

On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.

September 18, 2026

Event

Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI

On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).

August 17, 2026

Publications

In Law360, Trump Debarment Threat Calls for Targeted Defense Plan

Partners Ashley Callen and David Robbins authored an article for Law360 examining how entities should respond when suspension or debarment is threatened directly by the president, rather than initiated through the usual agency-driven process.

August 6, 2026

Publications

"DC Circuit Undercuts Congress's Subpoena Power: Important New Authority for Targets of Congressional Investigations," National Law Journal

In the National Law Journal, Congressional Investigations Co-Chair Emily Loeb, Special Counsel David Manners-Weber, and Associate Kate Mather examine a recent DC Circuit decision that gives fresh weight to 2020 Supreme Court dicta on common-law privileges in congressional investigations.

July 30, 2026