Amicus Brief Argues Texas Anti-Abortion Law is Designed to Impose Overwhelming Costs on Defendants

On February 16, 2023, a Jenner & Block team filed a pro bono amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a case challenging Senate Bill 8 in Texas. The law bans abortion once cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo, which typically occurs around the sixth week of pregnancy, and deputizes private individuals to sue anyone who performs or “aids and abets” the performance of an abortion. The minimum reward for a successful suit is $10,000.

The brief argues that SB 8 is designed to encourage costly duplicative litigation and create conflicting claims to a limited fund. “Under SB 8, any person who performs or aids in the performance of an abortion in violation of the statue is subject to suit by any person in Texas state court, regardless of whether they have a personal stake in the abortion performed,” the brief says.

Congress devised a tool for federal courts to resolve such disputes: interpleader. This procedural device enables courts to consolidate conflicting claims in a single proceeding. According to the brief, “the turmoil unleashed by SB 8’s private enforcement scheme demands a uniform method of dispute resolution.” Federal interpleader meets that demand by “protecting stakeholders from the unjust expense of defending multiple lawsuits and preserving judicial resources through the efficient resolution of conflicting claims.”

In Braid v. Stilley, three strangers from three different states sued Dr. Braid in state court to collect statutory damages for an abortion he performed in 2021. Dr. Braid then filed a federal interpleader action in Illinois, asserting that SB 8 violates his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights as well as his First Amendment rights to free speech and petition.

The team—which included Partner Lindsay Harrison, Associate Leslie Bruce, and Law Clerk Danny Li—filed the brief on behalf of three law professors with expertise in civil procedure, complex litigation, and civil remedies.

Related Lawyers

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Amicus Brief Argues Texas Anti-Abortion Law is Designed to Impose Overwhelming Costs on Defendants

On February 16, 2023, a Jenner & Block team filed a pro bono amicus brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a case challenging Senate Bill 8 in Texas. The law bans abortion once cardiac activity can be detected in the embryo, which typically occurs around the sixth week of pregnancy, and deputizes private individuals to sue anyone who performs or “aids and abets” the performance of an abortion. The minimum reward for a successful suit is $10,000.

The brief argues that SB 8 is designed to encourage costly duplicative litigation and create conflicting claims to a limited fund. “Under SB 8, any person who performs or aids in the performance of an abortion in violation of the statue is subject to suit by any person in Texas state court, regardless of whether they have a personal stake in the abortion performed,” the brief says.

Congress devised a tool for federal courts to resolve such disputes: interpleader. This procedural device enables courts to consolidate conflicting claims in a single proceeding. According to the brief, “the turmoil unleashed by SB 8’s private enforcement scheme demands a uniform method of dispute resolution.” Federal interpleader meets that demand by “protecting stakeholders from the unjust expense of defending multiple lawsuits and preserving judicial resources through the efficient resolution of conflicting claims.”

In Braid v. Stilley, three strangers from three different states sued Dr. Braid in state court to collect statutory damages for an abortion he performed in 2021. Dr. Braid then filed a federal interpleader action in Illinois, asserting that SB 8 violates his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights as well as his First Amendment rights to free speech and petition.

The team—which included Partner Lindsay Harrison, Associate Leslie Bruce, and Law Clerk Danny Li—filed the brief on behalf of three law professors with expertise in civil procedure, complex litigation, and civil remedies.

Related Lawyers

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar

As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.

October 14, 2026

Publications

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.

October 2026

Event

Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”

On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.

October 8, 2026

Event

Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference

On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

October 7, 2026

Publications

The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine

Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.

October 5, 2026