“Why Class Cert Is Unlikely in Cases Like Mattel ‘Wicked’ Suit,” Law360
In an article featured in Law360, Partner Alex Smith discusses the recently proposed class action, Holly Ricketson v. Mattel Inc. in the US District Court for the Central District of California and how it highlights the uphill battle plaintiffs face in certifying a class in such cases. The matter involves mislabeled children's dolls featuring characters from the movie Wicked.
In the article, Alex analyzes the case in which a parent claims that after purchasing the Wicked-themed doll for her daughter, she discovered the packaging included a link to an adult website, rather than the movie’s website, wickedmovie.com.
“Even if the plaintiff's lawsuit survives a motion to dismiss, certifying a class will not be as easy as clicking one's heels three times. To the contrary, the plaintiff will likely face steep obstacles if and when she seeks to certify a class,” Alex writes.
“When a case involves an obviously false or straightforwardly misleading statement on the front of a package, it may be relatively easy to certify a class. But when a plaintiff's claims require individual inquiry into whether the alleged mislabeling affected consumers' purchasing decisions or caused each consumer any injury, or when that alleged injury is not easy to quantify or measure, those individualized issues will often defeat certification. And as this case illustrates, it is eminently possible to spot those problems before filing a putative class action,” he added.
Alex helps consumer-facing companies defend the labeling of their products—including iconic food, beverage, personal care, and household products found in millions of homes. He persuades courts that his clients’ advertising is not deceptive, and he proves consumers received what his clients promised.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
In an article featured in Law360, Partner Alex Smith discusses the recently proposed class action, Holly Ricketson v. Mattel Inc. in the US District Court for the Central District of California and how it highlights the uphill battle plaintiffs face in certifying a class in such cases. The matter involves mislabeled children's dolls featuring characters from the movie Wicked.
In the article, Alex analyzes the case in which a parent claims that after purchasing the Wicked-themed doll for her daughter, she discovered the packaging included a link to an adult website, rather than the movie’s website, wickedmovie.com.
“Even if the plaintiff's lawsuit survives a motion to dismiss, certifying a class will not be as easy as clicking one's heels three times. To the contrary, the plaintiff will likely face steep obstacles if and when she seeks to certify a class,” Alex writes.
“When a case involves an obviously false or straightforwardly misleading statement on the front of a package, it may be relatively easy to certify a class. But when a plaintiff's claims require individual inquiry into whether the alleged mislabeling affected consumers' purchasing decisions or caused each consumer any injury, or when that alleged injury is not easy to quantify or measure, those individualized issues will often defeat certification. And as this case illustrates, it is eminently possible to spot those problems before filing a putative class action,” he added.
Alex helps consumer-facing companies defend the labeling of their products—including iconic food, beverage, personal care, and household products found in millions of homes. He persuades courts that his clients’ advertising is not deceptive, and he proves consumers received what his clients promised.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Podcasts
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.
July 15, 2026
Publications
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report
Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
July 14, 2026
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026