“The Post-Dobbs Litigation Landscape,” The State of Criminal Justice 2024

In Chapter 13 in the American Bar Association’s annual publication, The State of Criminal Justice 2024, Partners Anne Cortina PerryShoba Pillay, and Joanna Wright, and Associates Emily MannheimerIsabel Farhi, and Illyana Green discuss the legal landscape for abortion care following the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org. in 2022, which reversed Roe v. Wade. 

Read More

In the chapter, the authors analyze the state laws that prohibit abortion through state constitutional or statutory bans and provide an overview of key criminal issues in the post-Dobbs abortion litigation landscape. 

“Bans are generally considered to prohibit performing a surgical abortion on a pregnant person or prescribing or dispensing abortion medication to a pregnant person. The scope of “procuring” or “assisting” with an abortion is less clear and could be broadly read to include a host of individuals or entities who funded or otherwise assisted in the abortion,” the authors write. 

The authors also discuss the extent of liability (criminal penalties) for abortion bans, which vary widely by state and the impacts of secondary liability in states that seek to criminalize assisting in an abortion.

“While thus far untested, these state laws could be used to criminalize employers’ provision of insurance benefits that allow employees to travel out-of-state to access abortion care, to charge hospital staff and administrators who assist with an illegal abortion, or even to reach as far as potentially covering family members and friends who helped their loved one obtain abortion medication. Early state enforcement efforts have expansively construed theories of secondary liability to pursue a large array of actors,” the authors write. 

Other sections throughout the chapter discuss medication abortion, the impact of federal law on medication abortion laws, and territorial concerns.

“Beyond the increase in abortion bans and laws shortening the time a patient has to obtain an abortion, certain trends in abortion restrictions have developed since Dobbs was decided. One such trend is the increase in laws that specifically address the liability of the pregnant person, including laws that indicate that abortion patients cannot be held criminally liable under the law, and laws that indicate that they can. Similarly, more prosecutors may attempt to prosecute the pregnant person under other statutes, such as statutes criminalizing abuse of a corpse,” the authors conclude.

This article was first published by the American Bar Association, 2024. 

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

“The Post-Dobbs Litigation Landscape,” The State of Criminal Justice 2024

In Chapter 13 in the American Bar Association’s annual publication, The State of Criminal Justice 2024, Partners Anne Cortina PerryShoba Pillay, and Joanna Wright, and Associates Emily MannheimerIsabel Farhi, and Illyana Green discuss the legal landscape for abortion care following the US Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org. in 2022, which reversed Roe v. Wade. 

Read More

In the chapter, the authors analyze the state laws that prohibit abortion through state constitutional or statutory bans and provide an overview of key criminal issues in the post-Dobbs abortion litigation landscape. 

“Bans are generally considered to prohibit performing a surgical abortion on a pregnant person or prescribing or dispensing abortion medication to a pregnant person. The scope of “procuring” or “assisting” with an abortion is less clear and could be broadly read to include a host of individuals or entities who funded or otherwise assisted in the abortion,” the authors write. 

The authors also discuss the extent of liability (criminal penalties) for abortion bans, which vary widely by state and the impacts of secondary liability in states that seek to criminalize assisting in an abortion.

“While thus far untested, these state laws could be used to criminalize employers’ provision of insurance benefits that allow employees to travel out-of-state to access abortion care, to charge hospital staff and administrators who assist with an illegal abortion, or even to reach as far as potentially covering family members and friends who helped their loved one obtain abortion medication. Early state enforcement efforts have expansively construed theories of secondary liability to pursue a large array of actors,” the authors write. 

Other sections throughout the chapter discuss medication abortion, the impact of federal law on medication abortion laws, and territorial concerns.

“Beyond the increase in abortion bans and laws shortening the time a patient has to obtain an abortion, certain trends in abortion restrictions have developed since Dobbs was decided. One such trend is the increase in laws that specifically address the liability of the pregnant person, including laws that indicate that abortion patients cannot be held criminally liable under the law, and laws that indicate that they can. Similarly, more prosecutors may attempt to prosecute the pregnant person under other statutes, such as statutes criminalizing abuse of a corpse,” the authors conclude.

This article was first published by the American Bar Association, 2024. 

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Podcasts

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.

July 15, 2026

Publications

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report

Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

July 14, 2026

Publications

Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.

July 7, 2026

Publications

In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision

Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.

July 1, 2026

Event

Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference

On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.

July 1, 2026