"Repose in Cyberspace: The Single Publication Rule Online," Los Angeles Daily Journal
Publications
November 18, 2011
In this article, which is the November 2011 “Content Matters” column in the Los Angeles Daily Journal and San Francisco Daily Journal, Jenner & Block Partner Andrew J. Thomas examines how the uncertainty about the application of the single publication rule to Internet publications may unnecessarily inhibit online speech. Mr. Thomas notes that, beginning with the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Firth v. New York in 2002, courts across the country have applied the single publication rule to Internet publications and have held that the statute of limitations begins to run from the first Internet posting of a statement, even if the posting stays up for years and is subsequently accessed and downloaded many times. However, he poses the question, “But what happens when a Web publisher makes changes to content posted online years before? Does a new publication occur for statute of limitations purposes if the website operator moves content to a different part of a website, gives it a more prominent or different heading, or updates an article to correct outdated information or report on further developments?” Mr. Thomas concludes that analysis of several decisions on this point suggests that a Web publisher should be able to safely update archived reports and articles “provided that the new information is not itself defamatory (or otherwise actionable) and does not have the effect of presenting the old material to a new audience.” However, he also believes that legislative action may be necessary “to ensure that Internet publishers have the peace of mind to correct and update their online stories without fear of resetting the statute of limitations and exposing themselves to the risk of endless litigation.”
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Publications
November 18, 2011
In this article, which is the November 2011 “Content Matters” column in the Los Angeles Daily Journal and San Francisco Daily Journal, Jenner & Block Partner Andrew J. Thomas examines how the uncertainty about the application of the single publication rule to Internet publications may unnecessarily inhibit online speech. Mr. Thomas notes that, beginning with the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Firth v. New York in 2002, courts across the country have applied the single publication rule to Internet publications and have held that the statute of limitations begins to run from the first Internet posting of a statement, even if the posting stays up for years and is subsequently accessed and downloaded many times. However, he poses the question, “But what happens when a Web publisher makes changes to content posted online years before? Does a new publication occur for statute of limitations purposes if the website operator moves content to a different part of a website, gives it a more prominent or different heading, or updates an article to correct outdated information or report on further developments?” Mr. Thomas concludes that analysis of several decisions on this point suggests that a Web publisher should be able to safely update archived reports and articles “provided that the new information is not itself defamatory (or otherwise actionable) and does not have the effect of presenting the old material to a new audience.” However, he also believes that legislative action may be necessary “to ensure that Internet publishers have the peace of mind to correct and update their online stories without fear of resetting the statute of limitations and exposing themselves to the risk of endless litigation.”
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026