Partner Lucy Blake Featured in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary “Legal Comment of the Week” 

Partner Lucy Blake was featured in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary, where her commentary on the recent US Department of Justice memo— “Guidance for Recipients of Federal Funding Regarding Unlawful Discrimination”—was recognised as “Legal Comment of the Week.” The memo outlines what the administration sees as the “significant legal risks” associated with DEI programs and practices, and Lucy’s insights offer a timely reflection on the complexity multinational businesses now face in this evolving legal landscape.

Read More

Lucy offered a series of observations highlighting the challenges facing multinational businesses in this evolving regulatory landscape:

“The memo released by the DOJ exacerbates the tension for global companies. They face a Catch 22 situation with fundamentally divergent legal obligations on different sides of the pond—what they’re required to do in the UK or EU could land them in hot water in the US, and vice versa.”

“The tension is particularly acute for companies with government contracts, whose failure to comply with one set of obligations or the other may risk exclusion from public tender processes, and a subsequent loss of business.”

“This divergence between obligations in different jurisdictions gives rise to difficult legal, commercial, reputational, and political predicaments.” 

“It means that businesses are being forced to ‘pick their poison’ and may need to choose which set of responsibilities they are willing to breach.”

“The DOJ memo outlines what the administration sees as the ‘significant legal risks’ around DEI programs and practices. The memo sets out: (a) a ‘non-exhaustive list’ of unlawful practices, including examples; and (b) recommended best practices.”

“Across the pond in the EU and UK, however, there are multiple legal requirements, some of which are in tension with the expectations outlined in the memo. The dissonance between competing obligations places those with transatlantic businesses in an invidious position.”

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Partner Lucy Blake Featured in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary “Legal Comment of the Week” 

Partner Lucy Blake was featured in Edward Fennell’s Legal Diary, where her commentary on the recent US Department of Justice memo— “Guidance for Recipients of Federal Funding Regarding Unlawful Discrimination”—was recognised as “Legal Comment of the Week.” The memo outlines what the administration sees as the “significant legal risks” associated with DEI programs and practices, and Lucy’s insights offer a timely reflection on the complexity multinational businesses now face in this evolving legal landscape.

Read More

Lucy offered a series of observations highlighting the challenges facing multinational businesses in this evolving regulatory landscape:

“The memo released by the DOJ exacerbates the tension for global companies. They face a Catch 22 situation with fundamentally divergent legal obligations on different sides of the pond—what they’re required to do in the UK or EU could land them in hot water in the US, and vice versa.”

“The tension is particularly acute for companies with government contracts, whose failure to comply with one set of obligations or the other may risk exclusion from public tender processes, and a subsequent loss of business.”

“This divergence between obligations in different jurisdictions gives rise to difficult legal, commercial, reputational, and political predicaments.” 

“It means that businesses are being forced to ‘pick their poison’ and may need to choose which set of responsibilities they are willing to breach.”

“The DOJ memo outlines what the administration sees as the ‘significant legal risks’ around DEI programs and practices. The memo sets out: (a) a ‘non-exhaustive list’ of unlawful practices, including examples; and (b) recommended best practices.”

“Across the pond in the EU and UK, however, there are multiple legal requirements, some of which are in tension with the expectations outlined in the memo. The dissonance between competing obligations places those with transatlantic businesses in an invidious position.”

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar

As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.

October 14, 2026

Publications

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.

October 2026

Event

Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”

On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.

October 8, 2026

Event

Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference

On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

October 7, 2026

Publications

The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine

Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.

October 5, 2026