Partner David Greenwald Discusses Cyber Breach Response in The Circuit Rider  

In an article for The Circuit Rider, Partner David Greenwald discusses the challenge companies face in preserving attorney-client privilege and work product protections regarding the work of cyber breach consultants during data breach investigations. Since 2015, courts have compelled disclosure of cyber consultant materials in nine out of twelve cases discussed in the article.  The most salient difference is that the companies that were able to protect privilege established two separate work streams, one to support the work of counsel, and one to support identifying, scoping and remediating the source of the breach.

David acknowledges that incurring the additional cost and siloing off one of the workstreams from the business of correcting the breach “may seem inconceivable and counterintuitive to corporate decision makers” in the midst of a crisis. David also notes that while it may be understandable for a company not to prioritize maintaining privilege during a crisis, breach litigation may continue for years after remediation is complete, and companies may ultimately regret not taking more proactive steps to preserve this valuable corporate asset.

“The attorney-client privilege, which is owned by the company, is a corporate asset that a company may choose to impair in favor of urgent business needs,” said David.  “However, yielding privilege protection in a crisis – though practical under the circumstances – may not always be the result of careful consideration.”

Read More

David is an accomplished trial lawyer, representing clients facing complex, high-value disputes and corporate crises. He has tried cases in federal and state courts, arbitrated cases in the United States and Europe, and conducted criminal and civil internal investigations on three continents. He is a co-author of Testimonial Privileges (West 2025), and co-editor of Protecting Confidential Legal information: a handbook for analyzing issues under the attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine, (Jenner & Block 2023). Mr. Greenwald is a frequent speaker on topics relating to cross-border discovery, privilege, ethics, and e-discovery. He is a member of the firm’s Aerospace and Defense practice.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Partner David Greenwald Discusses Cyber Breach Response in The Circuit Rider  

In an article for The Circuit Rider, Partner David Greenwald discusses the challenge companies face in preserving attorney-client privilege and work product protections regarding the work of cyber breach consultants during data breach investigations. Since 2015, courts have compelled disclosure of cyber consultant materials in nine out of twelve cases discussed in the article.  The most salient difference is that the companies that were able to protect privilege established two separate work streams, one to support the work of counsel, and one to support identifying, scoping and remediating the source of the breach.

David acknowledges that incurring the additional cost and siloing off one of the workstreams from the business of correcting the breach “may seem inconceivable and counterintuitive to corporate decision makers” in the midst of a crisis. David also notes that while it may be understandable for a company not to prioritize maintaining privilege during a crisis, breach litigation may continue for years after remediation is complete, and companies may ultimately regret not taking more proactive steps to preserve this valuable corporate asset.

“The attorney-client privilege, which is owned by the company, is a corporate asset that a company may choose to impair in favor of urgent business needs,” said David.  “However, yielding privilege protection in a crisis – though practical under the circumstances – may not always be the result of careful consideration.”

Read More

David is an accomplished trial lawyer, representing clients facing complex, high-value disputes and corporate crises. He has tried cases in federal and state courts, arbitrated cases in the United States and Europe, and conducted criminal and civil internal investigations on three continents. He is a co-author of Testimonial Privileges (West 2025), and co-editor of Protecting Confidential Legal information: a handbook for analyzing issues under the attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine, (Jenner & Block 2023). Mr. Greenwald is a frequent speaker on topics relating to cross-border discovery, privilege, ethics, and e-discovery. He is a member of the firm’s Aerospace and Defense practice.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Podcasts

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.

July 15, 2026

Publications

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report

Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

July 14, 2026

Publications

Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.

July 7, 2026

Publications

In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision

Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.

July 1, 2026

Event

Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference

On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.

July 1, 2026