Client Alert: Small Businesses in the 8(a) Program Get Another Year of Eligibility to Make Up for Pandemic Disruption

Congress has been focused on ensuring that small businesses in the 8(a) program receive extra time to make up for disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic. To that end, Congress included language in both the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) and 2021 National Defense Authorization Act to provide one year of extended eligibility to companies who were 8(a) participants “as of” September 9, 2020. These acts required the Small Business Administration (SBA) to implement that mandate within 15 days of enactment. The CAA was signed on December 27, 2020, and SBA issued an interim final rule—with immediate effect—on January 13, 2021. This interim final rule provides important clarity on the extension of eligibility. Here are the details:

  • Any company participating in the 8(a) program between the dates of March 13, 2020 (the date of the pandemic disaster declaration) and September 9, 2020 (the “as of” date in the statutes) is eligible to extend its participation for one year from the end of its program. This eligibility exists regardless of whether the company elected to voluntarily suspend its program participation as a result of the President’s disaster declaration on March 13, 2020.
  • The two acts specified an “as of” date of September 9, 2020. The SBA added a start date, using the date of the disaster declaration: March 13, 2020. SBA stated that it sought to include any firms participating in the program as of the date of the national disaster declaration based on its “understanding that Congress extended the term of participation in the 8(a) BD [Business Development] program because it believed that the pandemic has adversely affected 8(a) concerns and their ability to participate in and receive the full benefits of the program.”
  • The period of extension will be added to the end of a company’s transitional stage in the 8(a) BD program. Thus, the company will receive the additional benefits of the transitional stage and also must meet the same 50 percent non-8(a) business activity target that applies to program year nine.
  • A firm that was participating in the 8(a) BD program as of March 13, 2020, but graduated or otherwise left the program before January 13, 2021 must notify SBA of its intent to be readmitted for an additional year. SBA must receive the request no later than March 15, 2021, and the company must certify that it continues to meet applicable 8(a) eligibility requirements.
  • This extension does not apply to business concerns that graduated from or otherwise left the 8(a) BD program prior to March 13, 2020, or to business concerns that were admitted to the 8(a) BD program after September 9, 2020. In addition, the extension does not apply to companies in the 8(a) BD program between March 13, 2020 and September 9, 2020 that were terminated, early graduated, or voluntarily withdrew from the program in lieu of being terminated or early graduated.

This one year extension provides an important benefit to 8(a) firms. SBA notes that the additional year of eligibility will benefit approximately 4,150 8(a) firms during the course of the next ten years.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Client Alert: Small Businesses in the 8(a) Program Get Another Year of Eligibility to Make Up for Pandemic Disruption

Congress has been focused on ensuring that small businesses in the 8(a) program receive extra time to make up for disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic. To that end, Congress included language in both the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) and 2021 National Defense Authorization Act to provide one year of extended eligibility to companies who were 8(a) participants “as of” September 9, 2020. These acts required the Small Business Administration (SBA) to implement that mandate within 15 days of enactment. The CAA was signed on December 27, 2020, and SBA issued an interim final rule—with immediate effect—on January 13, 2021. This interim final rule provides important clarity on the extension of eligibility. Here are the details:

  • Any company participating in the 8(a) program between the dates of March 13, 2020 (the date of the pandemic disaster declaration) and September 9, 2020 (the “as of” date in the statutes) is eligible to extend its participation for one year from the end of its program. This eligibility exists regardless of whether the company elected to voluntarily suspend its program participation as a result of the President’s disaster declaration on March 13, 2020.
  • The two acts specified an “as of” date of September 9, 2020. The SBA added a start date, using the date of the disaster declaration: March 13, 2020. SBA stated that it sought to include any firms participating in the program as of the date of the national disaster declaration based on its “understanding that Congress extended the term of participation in the 8(a) BD [Business Development] program because it believed that the pandemic has adversely affected 8(a) concerns and their ability to participate in and receive the full benefits of the program.”
  • The period of extension will be added to the end of a company’s transitional stage in the 8(a) BD program. Thus, the company will receive the additional benefits of the transitional stage and also must meet the same 50 percent non-8(a) business activity target that applies to program year nine.
  • A firm that was participating in the 8(a) BD program as of March 13, 2020, but graduated or otherwise left the program before January 13, 2021 must notify SBA of its intent to be readmitted for an additional year. SBA must receive the request no later than March 15, 2021, and the company must certify that it continues to meet applicable 8(a) eligibility requirements.
  • This extension does not apply to business concerns that graduated from or otherwise left the 8(a) BD program prior to March 13, 2020, or to business concerns that were admitted to the 8(a) BD program after September 9, 2020. In addition, the extension does not apply to companies in the 8(a) BD program between March 13, 2020 and September 9, 2020 that were terminated, early graduated, or voluntarily withdrew from the program in lieu of being terminated or early graduated.

This one year extension provides an important benefit to 8(a) firms. SBA notes that the additional year of eligibility will benefit approximately 4,150 8(a) firms during the course of the next ten years.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar

As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.

October 14, 2026

Publications

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.

October 2026

Event

Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”

On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.

October 8, 2026

Event

Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference

On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

October 7, 2026

Publications

The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine

Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.

October 5, 2026