Client Alert: New Buy American Proposed Rule Increases Domestic Content Thresholds and Foretells Future Change

As required by President Biden’s Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future is Made in America by All of America’s Workers, the FAR Council published on July 30, 2021 a proposed rule to amend the Buy American Act (BAA).1 While not fundamentally shifting the landscape, the proposed rule makes it more difficult to qualify as selling American-made goods and foretells of potential future changes in key questions for comment. However, for companies who do qualify, the proposed rule provides competitive benefits.

The BAA requires the federal government to procure articles, materials, and supplies that were mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States, substantially all from domestic components, subject to certain exceptions. This is implemented through an evaluation price preference for American-made products. Under the existing regulations, large businesses offering domestic supplies receive a 20 percent price preference, and small businesses receive a 30 percent price preference.

Currently, the determination of whether a manufactured end product or construction material qualifies as domestic is made using a two-part test. First, the end product or construction material must be manufactured in the United States. Second, a certain percentage of all component parts (determined by cost of the components) must also be mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States. The second prong of the test, historically known as the “component test,” was recently was redesignated the “domestic content test.” Under this prong, for an end product that does not consist wholly or predominantly of iron or steel or a combination of both, the cost of domestic components must exceed 55 percent of the cost of all components (with certain exceptions).

At a high level, there are three areas of changes in the proposed rule. First, the proposed rule includes an increase to the domestic content threshold, a schedule for future increases, and a fallback threshold that would allow for products meeting a specific lower domestic content threshold to qualify as domestic products under certain circumstances. Next, the proposed rule creates a new framework for application of an enhanced price preference for a domestic product that is considered a critical product or made up of critical components. Finally, the proposed rule establishes a post-award domestic content reporting requirement for contractors.

Significantly, the proposed rule does not replace the existing BAA “component test” in favor of a test under which domestic content is measured by the value that is added to the product through US-based production or US job-supporting economic activity. This still may change in the future, as the FAR Council seeks additional information regarding the “component test” as currently structured, as well as input on a better calculation for domestic content to achieve the policy aims of the BAA.

Enhanced Price Preference for Critical Products and Critical Components

In an effort to bolster American production of critical products, the rule provides for a framework through which higher price preferences will be applied for end products and construction material deemed to be critical or made up of critical components. In other words, companies offering American-made products will have an even greater preference over foreign products in these areas. The proposed rule places the onus on offerors to identify in their offer domestic end products that contain a critical component, so that contracting officers can apply the higher price preferences when appropriate.

The process for identifying critical items and critical components to receive the price preference would use the quadrennial critical supply chain review instituted in E.O. 14017, America’s Supply Chains, as well as the National COVID Strategy. Separate rulemaking will identify and add critical products and components to the FAR and to establish the associated preferences.

Post-award Reporting Requirement for Contractors

Under the proposed rule, contractors would be required to disclose to the government the specific domestic content of critical items, domestic end products containing a critical component, and domestic construction material containing a critical component, that were awarded under a contract. This reporting requirement does not apply to COTS items. The intent with this change is to provide the government with insight into the actual domestic content of products sold to the government, since currently this information is not readily available.

Applicability

The proposed rule would modify existing clauses, which will continue to apply, or not apply, to acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) and to acquisitions for commercial and COTS items as they did prior to the proposed rule.

The FAR Council has also proposed to add two clauses at FAR 52.225–XX, Domestic Content Reporting Requirement—Supplies, and FAR 52.225–YY, Domestic Content Reporting Requirement—Construction Materials. These clauses would apply to acquisitions at or below the SAT and to acquisitions for commercial items, excluding COTS items.

COTS Waiver

Since 2009, COTS items (with limited exceptions) have been subject to a waiver from the component test of the Buy American statute. Whether the component test will be restored to COTS items is under review by the Made in America Office in collaboration with the FAR Council and other interested parties.

Public Meeting and Comments

Domestic preference programs, such as the BAA, present an evolving landscape as the government tries to promote American-made products to benefit the American economy and American workers, as well as to protect the supply chain. This proposed rule is likely the first in a series of changes that will affect government contractors. To ensure your voice is heard throughout the rulemaking process, the FAR Council will hold a virtual public meeting on August 26, and will accept written comments on or before September 28, 2021. We stand ready to assist you in understanding the full import of this important rulemaking and in drafting comments on your behalf should that be of interest.

[1] 86 Fed. Reg. 40980.

Footnotes

[1] 86 Fed. Reg. 40980.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Client Alert: New Buy American Proposed Rule Increases Domestic Content Thresholds and Foretells Future Change

As required by President Biden’s Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future is Made in America by All of America’s Workers, the FAR Council published on July 30, 2021 a proposed rule to amend the Buy American Act (BAA).1 While not fundamentally shifting the landscape, the proposed rule makes it more difficult to qualify as selling American-made goods and foretells of potential future changes in key questions for comment. However, for companies who do qualify, the proposed rule provides competitive benefits.

The BAA requires the federal government to procure articles, materials, and supplies that were mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States, substantially all from domestic components, subject to certain exceptions. This is implemented through an evaluation price preference for American-made products. Under the existing regulations, large businesses offering domestic supplies receive a 20 percent price preference, and small businesses receive a 30 percent price preference.

Currently, the determination of whether a manufactured end product or construction material qualifies as domestic is made using a two-part test. First, the end product or construction material must be manufactured in the United States. Second, a certain percentage of all component parts (determined by cost of the components) must also be mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States. The second prong of the test, historically known as the “component test,” was recently was redesignated the “domestic content test.” Under this prong, for an end product that does not consist wholly or predominantly of iron or steel or a combination of both, the cost of domestic components must exceed 55 percent of the cost of all components (with certain exceptions).

At a high level, there are three areas of changes in the proposed rule. First, the proposed rule includes an increase to the domestic content threshold, a schedule for future increases, and a fallback threshold that would allow for products meeting a specific lower domestic content threshold to qualify as domestic products under certain circumstances. Next, the proposed rule creates a new framework for application of an enhanced price preference for a domestic product that is considered a critical product or made up of critical components. Finally, the proposed rule establishes a post-award domestic content reporting requirement for contractors.

Significantly, the proposed rule does not replace the existing BAA “component test” in favor of a test under which domestic content is measured by the value that is added to the product through US-based production or US job-supporting economic activity. This still may change in the future, as the FAR Council seeks additional information regarding the “component test” as currently structured, as well as input on a better calculation for domestic content to achieve the policy aims of the BAA.

Enhanced Price Preference for Critical Products and Critical Components

In an effort to bolster American production of critical products, the rule provides for a framework through which higher price preferences will be applied for end products and construction material deemed to be critical or made up of critical components. In other words, companies offering American-made products will have an even greater preference over foreign products in these areas. The proposed rule places the onus on offerors to identify in their offer domestic end products that contain a critical component, so that contracting officers can apply the higher price preferences when appropriate.

The process for identifying critical items and critical components to receive the price preference would use the quadrennial critical supply chain review instituted in E.O. 14017, America’s Supply Chains, as well as the National COVID Strategy. Separate rulemaking will identify and add critical products and components to the FAR and to establish the associated preferences.

Post-award Reporting Requirement for Contractors

Under the proposed rule, contractors would be required to disclose to the government the specific domestic content of critical items, domestic end products containing a critical component, and domestic construction material containing a critical component, that were awarded under a contract. This reporting requirement does not apply to COTS items. The intent with this change is to provide the government with insight into the actual domestic content of products sold to the government, since currently this information is not readily available.

Applicability

The proposed rule would modify existing clauses, which will continue to apply, or not apply, to acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) and to acquisitions for commercial and COTS items as they did prior to the proposed rule.

The FAR Council has also proposed to add two clauses at FAR 52.225–XX, Domestic Content Reporting Requirement—Supplies, and FAR 52.225–YY, Domestic Content Reporting Requirement—Construction Materials. These clauses would apply to acquisitions at or below the SAT and to acquisitions for commercial items, excluding COTS items.

COTS Waiver

Since 2009, COTS items (with limited exceptions) have been subject to a waiver from the component test of the Buy American statute. Whether the component test will be restored to COTS items is under review by the Made in America Office in collaboration with the FAR Council and other interested parties.

Public Meeting and Comments

Domestic preference programs, such as the BAA, present an evolving landscape as the government tries to promote American-made products to benefit the American economy and American workers, as well as to protect the supply chain. This proposed rule is likely the first in a series of changes that will affect government contractors. To ensure your voice is heard throughout the rulemaking process, the FAR Council will hold a virtual public meeting on August 26, and will accept written comments on or before September 28, 2021. We stand ready to assist you in understanding the full import of this important rulemaking and in drafting comments on your behalf should that be of interest.

[1] 86 Fed. Reg. 40980.

Footnotes

[1] 86 Fed. Reg. 40980.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair

On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.

September 18, 2026

Publications

In American Banker, Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Weighs in on OCC's Handling of Fintech Bank Charter Applications

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon spoke with American Banker about how the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is approaching bank charter applications from fintechs, amid a growing wave of companies seeking charters from federal regulators.

August 18, 2026

Event

Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI

On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).

August 17, 2026