Client Alert: Latest Decisions in Criminal No-Poach and Civil Non-Compete Cases Indicate Continuing Scrutiny of Restrictive Covenants
Publications
July 12, 2022
Parties in Criminal No-Poach Case Reach Pre-Trial Resolution
Recently, the parties in United States v. Hee notified District Court Judge Boulware of the District of Nevada that they reached a preliminary plea deal. The case involves healthcare staffing company, VDA, and its former regional manager, Ryan Hee. In March 2021, VDA and Hee were indicted for conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act. Specifically, the Department of Justice alleged defendants conspired with competitors not to recruit or hire one another’s employees and to refrain from raising wages.
Hee is part of a recent trend of criminal prosecutions targeting wage suppression and no-poach agreements. The potential plea deal comes on the heels of two recent acquittals in criminal antitrust prosecutions, United States v. DaVita and United States v. Jindal, which involved similar allegations. As we explain in recent client alerts, unique factors may have contributed to the government’s trial losses in Davita and Jindal. Should the Hee agreement be finalized and end in guilty pleas from the defendants, this would mark the Department of Justice’s first win in employment-related antitrust prosecutions.
Read the full alert here.
Related Attorneys
Related Articles
- Client Alert: Biden Administration Announces Plans to Curtail Non-Compete Agreements for Workers
- Client Alert: DOJ Continues Push Against Non-Competes, Non-Solicitations, and Other Post Employment Restrictions
- Client Alert: Department of Justice Prosecutions in Employment-Related Antitrust Suits Fall Flat in DaVita Inc. and Jindal
- Client Alert: The Biden White House Ramps up Antitrust Enforcement and Reform
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Publications
July 12, 2022
Parties in Criminal No-Poach Case Reach Pre-Trial Resolution
Recently, the parties in United States v. Hee notified District Court Judge Boulware of the District of Nevada that they reached a preliminary plea deal. The case involves healthcare staffing company, VDA, and its former regional manager, Ryan Hee. In March 2021, VDA and Hee were indicted for conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Act. Specifically, the Department of Justice alleged defendants conspired with competitors not to recruit or hire one another’s employees and to refrain from raising wages.
Hee is part of a recent trend of criminal prosecutions targeting wage suppression and no-poach agreements. The potential plea deal comes on the heels of two recent acquittals in criminal antitrust prosecutions, United States v. DaVita and United States v. Jindal, which involved similar allegations. As we explain in recent client alerts, unique factors may have contributed to the government’s trial losses in Davita and Jindal. Should the Hee agreement be finalized and end in guilty pleas from the defendants, this would mark the Department of Justice’s first win in employment-related antitrust prosecutions.
Read the full alert here.
Related Attorneys
Related Articles
- Client Alert: Biden Administration Announces Plans to Curtail Non-Compete Agreements for Workers
- Client Alert: DOJ Continues Push Against Non-Competes, Non-Solicitations, and Other Post Employment Restrictions
- Client Alert: Department of Justice Prosecutions in Employment-Related Antitrust Suits Fall Flat in DaVita Inc. and Jindal
- Client Alert: The Biden White House Ramps up Antitrust Enforcement and Reform
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Podcasts
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.
July 15, 2026
Publications
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report
Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
July 14, 2026
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026