Client Alert: Group Health Plan “Gag Clause” Compliance Attestation Due by the End of 2023
This is a reminder that a new compliance deadline is on the horizon for group health plans. The Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) of 2021 generally prohibits group health plans and health insurance issuers from entering into agreements containing gag clauses. An annual attestation of compliance with the gag clause prohibition is required, with the first due by December 31, 2023. Employers with group health plans subject to the gag clause restrictions will need to review their plan’s agreements and be prepared to attest to compliance.
A gag clause is language in a contract between a group health plan[1] and service providers that directly or indirectly restricts the group health plan from sharing specific data and information. A gag clause can exist between a group health plan and:
-
-
-
- A health care provider,
- Network or association of providers,
- Third-party administrator (TPA), or
- Other service provider offering access to a network of providers.
-
-
The CAA prohibits contractual language that restricts a group health plan from:
-
-
-
-
Providing provider-specific cost or quality of care information or data to referring providers, the plan sponsor, participants, beneficiaries, enrollees, or eligible enrollees;
-
Electronically accessing de-identified claims and encounter information or data for participants, beneficiaries, or enrollees in the plan or coverage upon request and consistent with the privacy regulations; or
-
Sharing any of the above information or data with a business associate.
-
-
-
As mentioned, a gag clause’s restrictions can be either direct or indirect. In an example of a direct gag clause, a contract between a TPA and group health plan states that the plan will pay providers at rates designated as “Point of Services Rates,” which the TPA considers to be proprietary and includes language in the contract specifically prohibiting its disclosure. An example of an indirect gag clause, which is not as overt, is a contract between a TPA and group health plan in which the plan sponsor’s access to provider-specific cost and quality of care information is only at the discretion of the TPA. Both contract provisions are deemed gag clauses and are prohibited.
The first gag clause prohibition compliance attestation is due by December 31, 2023, and will cover the period between December 27, 2020 (or the effective date of the group health plan or health insurance coverage if later) and the date of attestation. Group health plans must annually submit an attestation by December 31 thereafter covering the period since the previous attestation. The initial attestation will require reviewing contracts in effect on or after December 27, 2020, for any offensive gag clause language. Amending existing contracts may be necessary to ensure ongoing compliance.
The entities that are required to submit an attestation include both self-insured and fully insured group health plans.[2] Entities not required to attest include account-based plans like health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), health flexible spending accounts (FSAs), and health savings accounts (HRAs) and plans or issuers offering only excepted benefits.
A self-insured plan may enter into a written agreement with service provider(s), such as a TPA or pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), to attest on behalf of the plan. However, the self-insured plan should be aware that the burden to comply and timely attest remains with the plan. Self-insured plans relying on service providers to submit an attestation should confirm and document that attestations were made. With respect to fully-insured group health plans, the group health plan and issuer are each required to annually submit the gag clause prohibition compliance attestation. However, when the issuer of a fully-insured group health plan submits an attestation on behalf of the plan, both the plan and issuer are considered to have satisfied the attestation submission requirement.
Attestations will be made using the Health Insurance Oversight System (HIOS). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have created a website with more information regarding the submission process. Failure to timely submit an attestation may result in enforcement action, such as $100 per day per affected individual. While practical enforcement action is unclear at this time, potential exposure could be significant for failing to comply.
Plans still working towards compliance should review contracts for gag clauses and/or ensure existing language is flexible enough to accommodate compliance with appliable law and amend where necessary. Plans should speak with their TPA, PBM, and other service providers to determine who will be submitting the attestation; and enter into a written agreement if necessary and document compliance. If the plan is attesting itself, it should follow CMS’ instructions for attesting through HIOS. If your company requires assistance reviewing contractual language or completing the attestation, reach out to your Jenner & Block contact for assistance.
A gag clause is language in a contract between a group health plan[1] and service providers that directly or indirectly restricts the group health plan from sharing specific data and information. A gag clause can exist between a group health plan and:
-
-
-
- A health care provider,
- Network or association of providers,
- Third-party administrator (TPA), or
- Other service provider offering access to a network of providers.
-
-
The CAA prohibits contractual language that restricts a group health plan from:
-
-
-
-
Providing provider-specific cost or quality of care information or data to referring providers, the plan sponsor, participants, beneficiaries, enrollees, or eligible enrollees;
-
Electronically accessing de-identified claims and encounter information or data for participants, beneficiaries, or enrollees in the plan or coverage upon request and consistent with the privacy regulations; or
-
Sharing any of the above information or data with a business associate.
-
-
-
As mentioned, a gag clause’s restrictions can be either direct or indirect. In an example of a direct gag clause, a contract between a TPA and group health plan states that the plan will pay providers at rates designated as “Point of Services Rates,” which the TPA considers to be proprietary and includes language in the contract specifically prohibiting its disclosure. An example of an indirect gag clause, which is not as overt, is a contract between a TPA and group health plan in which the plan sponsor’s access to provider-specific cost and quality of care information is only at the discretion of the TPA. Both contract provisions are deemed gag clauses and are prohibited.
The first gag clause prohibition compliance attestation is due by December 31, 2023, and will cover the period between December 27, 2020 (or the effective date of the group health plan or health insurance coverage if later) and the date of attestation. Group health plans must annually submit an attestation by December 31 thereafter covering the period since the previous attestation. The initial attestation will require reviewing contracts in effect on or after December 27, 2020, for any offensive gag clause language. Amending existing contracts may be necessary to ensure ongoing compliance.
The entities that are required to submit an attestation include both self-insured and fully insured group health plans.[2] Entities not required to attest include account-based plans like health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), health flexible spending accounts (FSAs), and health savings accounts (HRAs) and plans or issuers offering only excepted benefits.
A self-insured plan may enter into a written agreement with service provider(s), such as a TPA or pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), to attest on behalf of the plan. However, the self-insured plan should be aware that the burden to comply and timely attest remains with the plan. Self-insured plans relying on service providers to submit an attestation should confirm and document that attestations were made. With respect to fully-insured group health plans, the group health plan and issuer are each required to annually submit the gag clause prohibition compliance attestation. However, when the issuer of a fully-insured group health plan submits an attestation on behalf of the plan, both the plan and issuer are considered to have satisfied the attestation submission requirement.
Attestations will be made using the Health Insurance Oversight System (HIOS). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have created a website with more information regarding the submission process. Failure to timely submit an attestation may result in enforcement action, such as $100 per day per affected individual. While practical enforcement action is unclear at this time, potential exposure could be significant for failing to comply.
Plans still working towards compliance should review contracts for gag clauses and/or ensure existing language is flexible enough to accommodate compliance with appliable law and amend where necessary. Plans should speak with their TPA, PBM, and other service providers to determine who will be submitting the attestation; and enter into a written agreement if necessary and document compliance. If the plan is attesting itself, it should follow CMS’ instructions for attesting through HIOS. If your company requires assistance reviewing contractual language or completing the attestation, reach out to your Jenner & Block contact for assistance.
[1] The gag clause attestation rules apply to group health plans and issuers of individual and group insurance policies. The article will use the term “group health plan,” but it should be understood that the rules also apply to issuers of individual and group insurance policies.
[2] Group health plans required to comply include ERISA plans (including both grandfathered and grandmothered health plans), non-federal governmental plans, and church plans subject to the Internal Revenue Code.
Footnotes
[1] The gag clause attestation rules apply to group health plans and issuers of individual and group insurance policies. The article will use the term “group health plan,” but it should be understood that the rules also apply to issuers of individual and group insurance policies.
[2] Group health plans required to comply include ERISA plans (including both grandfathered and grandmothered health plans), non-federal governmental plans, and church plans subject to the Internal Revenue Code.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
This is a reminder that a new compliance deadline is on the horizon for group health plans. The Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) of 2021 generally prohibits group health plans and health insurance issuers from entering into agreements containing gag clauses. An annual attestation of compliance with the gag clause prohibition is required, with the first due by December 31, 2023. Employers with group health plans subject to the gag clause restrictions will need to review their plan’s agreements and be prepared to attest to compliance.
A gag clause is language in a contract between a group health plan[1] and service providers that directly or indirectly restricts the group health plan from sharing specific data and information. A gag clause can exist between a group health plan and:
-
-
-
- A health care provider,
- Network or association of providers,
- Third-party administrator (TPA), or
- Other service provider offering access to a network of providers.
-
-
The CAA prohibits contractual language that restricts a group health plan from:
-
-
-
-
Providing provider-specific cost or quality of care information or data to referring providers, the plan sponsor, participants, beneficiaries, enrollees, or eligible enrollees;
-
Electronically accessing de-identified claims and encounter information or data for participants, beneficiaries, or enrollees in the plan or coverage upon request and consistent with the privacy regulations; or
-
Sharing any of the above information or data with a business associate.
-
-
-
As mentioned, a gag clause’s restrictions can be either direct or indirect. In an example of a direct gag clause, a contract between a TPA and group health plan states that the plan will pay providers at rates designated as “Point of Services Rates,” which the TPA considers to be proprietary and includes language in the contract specifically prohibiting its disclosure. An example of an indirect gag clause, which is not as overt, is a contract between a TPA and group health plan in which the plan sponsor’s access to provider-specific cost and quality of care information is only at the discretion of the TPA. Both contract provisions are deemed gag clauses and are prohibited.
The first gag clause prohibition compliance attestation is due by December 31, 2023, and will cover the period between December 27, 2020 (or the effective date of the group health plan or health insurance coverage if later) and the date of attestation. Group health plans must annually submit an attestation by December 31 thereafter covering the period since the previous attestation. The initial attestation will require reviewing contracts in effect on or after December 27, 2020, for any offensive gag clause language. Amending existing contracts may be necessary to ensure ongoing compliance.
The entities that are required to submit an attestation include both self-insured and fully insured group health plans.[2] Entities not required to attest include account-based plans like health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), health flexible spending accounts (FSAs), and health savings accounts (HRAs) and plans or issuers offering only excepted benefits.
A self-insured plan may enter into a written agreement with service provider(s), such as a TPA or pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), to attest on behalf of the plan. However, the self-insured plan should be aware that the burden to comply and timely attest remains with the plan. Self-insured plans relying on service providers to submit an attestation should confirm and document that attestations were made. With respect to fully-insured group health plans, the group health plan and issuer are each required to annually submit the gag clause prohibition compliance attestation. However, when the issuer of a fully-insured group health plan submits an attestation on behalf of the plan, both the plan and issuer are considered to have satisfied the attestation submission requirement.
Attestations will be made using the Health Insurance Oversight System (HIOS). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have created a website with more information regarding the submission process. Failure to timely submit an attestation may result in enforcement action, such as $100 per day per affected individual. While practical enforcement action is unclear at this time, potential exposure could be significant for failing to comply.
Plans still working towards compliance should review contracts for gag clauses and/or ensure existing language is flexible enough to accommodate compliance with appliable law and amend where necessary. Plans should speak with their TPA, PBM, and other service providers to determine who will be submitting the attestation; and enter into a written agreement if necessary and document compliance. If the plan is attesting itself, it should follow CMS’ instructions for attesting through HIOS. If your company requires assistance reviewing contractual language or completing the attestation, reach out to your Jenner & Block contact for assistance.
A gag clause is language in a contract between a group health plan[1] and service providers that directly or indirectly restricts the group health plan from sharing specific data and information. A gag clause can exist between a group health plan and:
-
-
-
- A health care provider,
- Network or association of providers,
- Third-party administrator (TPA), or
- Other service provider offering access to a network of providers.
-
-
The CAA prohibits contractual language that restricts a group health plan from:
-
-
-
-
Providing provider-specific cost or quality of care information or data to referring providers, the plan sponsor, participants, beneficiaries, enrollees, or eligible enrollees;
-
Electronically accessing de-identified claims and encounter information or data for participants, beneficiaries, or enrollees in the plan or coverage upon request and consistent with the privacy regulations; or
-
Sharing any of the above information or data with a business associate.
-
-
-
As mentioned, a gag clause’s restrictions can be either direct or indirect. In an example of a direct gag clause, a contract between a TPA and group health plan states that the plan will pay providers at rates designated as “Point of Services Rates,” which the TPA considers to be proprietary and includes language in the contract specifically prohibiting its disclosure. An example of an indirect gag clause, which is not as overt, is a contract between a TPA and group health plan in which the plan sponsor’s access to provider-specific cost and quality of care information is only at the discretion of the TPA. Both contract provisions are deemed gag clauses and are prohibited.
The first gag clause prohibition compliance attestation is due by December 31, 2023, and will cover the period between December 27, 2020 (or the effective date of the group health plan or health insurance coverage if later) and the date of attestation. Group health plans must annually submit an attestation by December 31 thereafter covering the period since the previous attestation. The initial attestation will require reviewing contracts in effect on or after December 27, 2020, for any offensive gag clause language. Amending existing contracts may be necessary to ensure ongoing compliance.
The entities that are required to submit an attestation include both self-insured and fully insured group health plans.[2] Entities not required to attest include account-based plans like health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs), health flexible spending accounts (FSAs), and health savings accounts (HRAs) and plans or issuers offering only excepted benefits.
A self-insured plan may enter into a written agreement with service provider(s), such as a TPA or pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), to attest on behalf of the plan. However, the self-insured plan should be aware that the burden to comply and timely attest remains with the plan. Self-insured plans relying on service providers to submit an attestation should confirm and document that attestations were made. With respect to fully-insured group health plans, the group health plan and issuer are each required to annually submit the gag clause prohibition compliance attestation. However, when the issuer of a fully-insured group health plan submits an attestation on behalf of the plan, both the plan and issuer are considered to have satisfied the attestation submission requirement.
Attestations will be made using the Health Insurance Oversight System (HIOS). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have created a website with more information regarding the submission process. Failure to timely submit an attestation may result in enforcement action, such as $100 per day per affected individual. While practical enforcement action is unclear at this time, potential exposure could be significant for failing to comply.
Plans still working towards compliance should review contracts for gag clauses and/or ensure existing language is flexible enough to accommodate compliance with appliable law and amend where necessary. Plans should speak with their TPA, PBM, and other service providers to determine who will be submitting the attestation; and enter into a written agreement if necessary and document compliance. If the plan is attesting itself, it should follow CMS’ instructions for attesting through HIOS. If your company requires assistance reviewing contractual language or completing the attestation, reach out to your Jenner & Block contact for assistance.
[1] The gag clause attestation rules apply to group health plans and issuers of individual and group insurance policies. The article will use the term “group health plan,” but it should be understood that the rules also apply to issuers of individual and group insurance policies.
[2] Group health plans required to comply include ERISA plans (including both grandfathered and grandmothered health plans), non-federal governmental plans, and church plans subject to the Internal Revenue Code.
Footnotes
[1] The gag clause attestation rules apply to group health plans and issuers of individual and group insurance policies. The article will use the term “group health plan,” but it should be understood that the rules also apply to issuers of individual and group insurance policies.
[2] Group health plans required to comply include ERISA plans (including both grandfathered and grandmothered health plans), non-federal governmental plans, and church plans subject to the Internal Revenue Code.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026