Changes to Reporting Requirements for US Defense Transactions
Publications
October 2024
The National Defense Authorization Act was revised in December to state that parties to an HSR-reportable transaction that “will require a review by the Department of Defense who are required to file the notification and provide supplementary information to the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission . . . shall concurrently provide such information to the Department of Defense during the waiting period . . .” This revision is intended to assist the Department of Defense (DOD) identify transactions that threaten to harm competition in the defense industrial base. But it is unclear which transactions “will require a review” by DOD and thus invoke the notice requirement, because there is currently no mandatory trigger for DOD review of transactions.
Instead, the DOD’s Industrial Base Policy M&A Office has discretionary authority to assess transactions involving “major defense suppliers,” defined under DOD Directive 5000.62 as, “any prime contractor or subcontractor that the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the USD(AT&L), or the DASD(MIBP) designates as a main source of supply.” In addition, there are certain classes of contractors considered major defense suppliers without the need for specific designation. There is additional ambiguity around whether notice is required for all HSR-reportable transactions or only those where “supplementary information” has been required to be submitted to the antitrust agencies. In other words, based on the language of the statute, it is arguable that the triggering event for DOD notice is not the HSR filing but instead the opening of an investigation and the provision of information during the waiting period to supplement the HSR filing.
Neither the Premerger Notification Office nor DOD have issued official guidance on how to interpret this language or the mechanics of how such notice would be made. Parties engaged in transactions connected to the defense industry should consult experienced antitrust counsel to assess reporting requirements.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Publications
October 2024
The National Defense Authorization Act was revised in December to state that parties to an HSR-reportable transaction that “will require a review by the Department of Defense who are required to file the notification and provide supplementary information to the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission . . . shall concurrently provide such information to the Department of Defense during the waiting period . . .” This revision is intended to assist the Department of Defense (DOD) identify transactions that threaten to harm competition in the defense industrial base. But it is unclear which transactions “will require a review” by DOD and thus invoke the notice requirement, because there is currently no mandatory trigger for DOD review of transactions.
Instead, the DOD’s Industrial Base Policy M&A Office has discretionary authority to assess transactions involving “major defense suppliers,” defined under DOD Directive 5000.62 as, “any prime contractor or subcontractor that the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the USD(AT&L), or the DASD(MIBP) designates as a main source of supply.” In addition, there are certain classes of contractors considered major defense suppliers without the need for specific designation. There is additional ambiguity around whether notice is required for all HSR-reportable transactions or only those where “supplementary information” has been required to be submitted to the antitrust agencies. In other words, based on the language of the statute, it is arguable that the triggering event for DOD notice is not the HSR filing but instead the opening of an investigation and the provision of information during the waiting period to supplement the HSR filing.
Neither the Premerger Notification Office nor DOD have issued official guidance on how to interpret this language or the mechanics of how such notice would be made. Parties engaged in transactions connected to the defense industry should consult experienced antitrust counsel to assess reporting requirements.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair
On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.
September 18, 2026
Publications
In American Banker, Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Weighs in on OCC's Handling of Fintech Bank Charter Applications
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon spoke with American Banker about how the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is approaching bank charter applications from fintechs, amid a growing wave of companies seeking charters from federal regulators.
August 18, 2026
Event
Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI
On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).
August 17, 2026
Publications
Special Counsel Kimberly Cook Featured in FCBA Member Spotlight
The Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA) featured Kimberly Cook in its Member Spotlight series.
August 13, 2026
Recognition
Three Jenner & Block Partners Named to Crain's New York Business' 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law List
Crain's New York Business recognized Jenner & Block Partners Anthony Barkow, Alison Stein, and Damian Williams among its 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law.
August 10, 2026
Publications
In Law360, Trump Debarment Threat Calls for Targeted Defense Plan
Partners Ashley Callen and David Robbins authored an article for Law360 examining how entities should respond when suspension or debarment is threatened directly by the president, rather than initiated through the usual agency-driven process.
August 6, 2026