Changes to Reporting Requirements for US Defense Transactions

The National Defense Authorization Act was revised in December to state that parties to an HSR-reportable transaction that “will require a review by the Department of Defense who are required to file the notification and provide supplementary information to the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission . . . shall concurrently provide such information to the Department of Defense during the waiting period . . .” This revision is intended to assist the Department of Defense (DOD) identify transactions that threaten to harm competition in the defense industrial base. But it is unclear which transactions “will require a review” by DOD and thus invoke the notice requirement, because there is currently no mandatory trigger for DOD review of transactions. 

Instead, the DOD’s Industrial Base Policy M&A Office has discretionary authority to assess transactions involving “major defense suppliers,” defined under DOD Directive 5000.62 as, “any prime contractor or subcontractor that the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the USD(AT&L), or the DASD(MIBP) designates as a main source of supply.” In addition, there are certain classes of contractors considered major defense suppliers without the need for specific designation. There is additional ambiguity around whether notice is required for all HSR-reportable transactions or only those where “supplementary information” has been required to be submitted to the antitrust agencies. In other words, based on the language of the statute, it is arguable that the triggering event for DOD notice is not the HSR filing but instead the opening of an investigation and the provision of information during the waiting period to supplement the HSR filing.

Neither the Premerger Notification Office nor DOD have issued official guidance on how to interpret this language or the mechanics of how such notice would be made. Parties engaged in transactions connected to the defense industry should consult experienced antitrust counsel to assess reporting requirements.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Changes to Reporting Requirements for US Defense Transactions

The National Defense Authorization Act was revised in December to state that parties to an HSR-reportable transaction that “will require a review by the Department of Defense who are required to file the notification and provide supplementary information to the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission . . . shall concurrently provide such information to the Department of Defense during the waiting period . . .” This revision is intended to assist the Department of Defense (DOD) identify transactions that threaten to harm competition in the defense industrial base. But it is unclear which transactions “will require a review” by DOD and thus invoke the notice requirement, because there is currently no mandatory trigger for DOD review of transactions. 

Instead, the DOD’s Industrial Base Policy M&A Office has discretionary authority to assess transactions involving “major defense suppliers,” defined under DOD Directive 5000.62 as, “any prime contractor or subcontractor that the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the USD(AT&L), or the DASD(MIBP) designates as a main source of supply.” In addition, there are certain classes of contractors considered major defense suppliers without the need for specific designation. There is additional ambiguity around whether notice is required for all HSR-reportable transactions or only those where “supplementary information” has been required to be submitted to the antitrust agencies. In other words, based on the language of the statute, it is arguable that the triggering event for DOD notice is not the HSR filing but instead the opening of an investigation and the provision of information during the waiting period to supplement the HSR filing.

Neither the Premerger Notification Office nor DOD have issued official guidance on how to interpret this language or the mechanics of how such notice would be made. Parties engaged in transactions connected to the defense industry should consult experienced antitrust counsel to assess reporting requirements.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar

As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.

October 14, 2026

Publications

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.

October 2026

Event

Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”

On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.

October 8, 2026

Event

Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference

On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

October 7, 2026

Publications

The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine

Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.

October 5, 2026

Recognition

Jenner & Block Rises in American Lawyer Rankings for Summer Associate Experience

Jenner & Block ranked 14th nationally in The American Lawyer’s 2026 Summer Associate Satisfaction Survey, jumping 10 spots from last year. The annual survey measures summer associate satisfaction at US law firms based on ratings provided directly by summer associates across key firm qualities.

October 2, 2026

Publications

Partner Ashley Callen Discusses Potential Congressional Investigations in Reuters

Partner Ashley Callen was quoted in a Reuters article examining how Democrats could ramp up congressional investigations into Trump family business dealings if they win control of the House or Senate in the 2026 midterm elections this November.

September 30, 2026