California Supreme Court Opens Door for Nonprofits to Sue for Anticompetitive Practices
Publications
September 2023
On July 18, 2023, the California Supreme Court held as a matter of first impression that a public interest advocacy organization maintains standing to bring claims under the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), if it has incurred costs and resources in responding to those alleged bad acts.
In 2012, the California Medical Association (CMA), a professional association that represents more than 37,000 California physicians, sued Aetna Health for engaging in anticompetitive practices. CMA alleged that Aetna had been discouraging Aetna-insured patients from going out-of-network by threatening termination or actually terminating physicians for referring patients to out-of-network providers. On summary judgment, Aetna argued that CMA lacked UCL standing because CMA had not lost money or property as a result of the policy at issue and that standing could only be conferred to individual physicians. The trial court granted Aetna’s motion for summary judgment on standing grounds and the Court of Appeal affirmed.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling and held that CMA maintains standing to bring suit. The Court held that while CMA may not have suffered direct economic harm, CMA suffered an economic injury through the diversion of personnel and other resources used to respond to Aetna’s policy, as these resources would otherwise have been used to benefit CMA’s members. While this holding provides a new way to establish standing under the UCL, the Court cautioned that organizations may not rely on expenditures made “in the course of UCL litigation, or to prepare for UCL litigation” to establish economic injury.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
In 2012, the California Medical Association (CMA), a professional association that represents more than 37,000 California physicians, sued Aetna Health for engaging in anticompetitive practices. CMA alleged that Aetna had been discouraging Aetna-insured patients from going out-of-network by threatening termination or actually terminating physicians for referring patients to out-of-network providers. On summary judgment, Aetna argued that CMA lacked UCL standing because CMA had not lost money or property as a result of the policy at issue and that standing could only be conferred to individual physicians. The trial court granted Aetna’s motion for summary judgment on standing grounds and the Court of Appeal affirmed.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling and held that CMA maintains standing to bring suit. The Court held that while CMA may not have suffered direct economic harm, CMA suffered an economic injury through the diversion of personnel and other resources used to respond to Aetna’s policy, as these resources would otherwise have been used to benefit CMA’s members. While this holding provides a new way to establish standing under the UCL, the Court cautioned that organizations may not rely on expenditures made “in the course of UCL litigation, or to prepare for UCL litigation” to establish economic injury.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Publications
September 2023
On July 18, 2023, the California Supreme Court held as a matter of first impression that a public interest advocacy organization maintains standing to bring claims under the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), if it has incurred costs and resources in responding to those alleged bad acts.
In 2012, the California Medical Association (CMA), a professional association that represents more than 37,000 California physicians, sued Aetna Health for engaging in anticompetitive practices. CMA alleged that Aetna had been discouraging Aetna-insured patients from going out-of-network by threatening termination or actually terminating physicians for referring patients to out-of-network providers. On summary judgment, Aetna argued that CMA lacked UCL standing because CMA had not lost money or property as a result of the policy at issue and that standing could only be conferred to individual physicians. The trial court granted Aetna’s motion for summary judgment on standing grounds and the Court of Appeal affirmed.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling and held that CMA maintains standing to bring suit. The Court held that while CMA may not have suffered direct economic harm, CMA suffered an economic injury through the diversion of personnel and other resources used to respond to Aetna’s policy, as these resources would otherwise have been used to benefit CMA’s members. While this holding provides a new way to establish standing under the UCL, the Court cautioned that organizations may not rely on expenditures made “in the course of UCL litigation, or to prepare for UCL litigation” to establish economic injury.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
In 2012, the California Medical Association (CMA), a professional association that represents more than 37,000 California physicians, sued Aetna Health for engaging in anticompetitive practices. CMA alleged that Aetna had been discouraging Aetna-insured patients from going out-of-network by threatening termination or actually terminating physicians for referring patients to out-of-network providers. On summary judgment, Aetna argued that CMA lacked UCL standing because CMA had not lost money or property as a result of the policy at issue and that standing could only be conferred to individual physicians. The trial court granted Aetna’s motion for summary judgment on standing grounds and the Court of Appeal affirmed.
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling and held that CMA maintains standing to bring suit. The Court held that while CMA may not have suffered direct economic harm, CMA suffered an economic injury through the diversion of personnel and other resources used to respond to Aetna’s policy, as these resources would otherwise have been used to benefit CMA’s members. While this holding provides a new way to establish standing under the UCL, the Court cautioned that organizations may not rely on expenditures made “in the course of UCL litigation, or to prepare for UCL litigation” to establish economic injury.
This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair
On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.
September 18, 2026
Publications
In American Banker, Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Weighs in on OCC's Handling of Fintech Bank Charter Applications
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon spoke with American Banker about how the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is approaching bank charter applications from fintechs, amid a growing wave of companies seeking charters from federal regulators.
August 18, 2026
Event
Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI
On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).
August 17, 2026
Publications
Special Counsel Kimberly Cook Featured in FCBA Member Spotlight
The Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA) featured Kimberly Cook in its Member Spotlight series.
August 13, 2026
Recognition
Three Jenner & Block Partners Named to Crain's New York Business' 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law List
Crain's New York Business recognized Jenner & Block Partners Anthony Barkow, Alison Stein, and Damian Williams among its 2026 Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law.
August 10, 2026