Amendments to the English Arbitration Act on Hold

In our September 2023 newsletter, we wrote about proposed amendments to the English Arbitration Act as it approaches its 30th anniversary. The proposed amendments were seen as very light touch, but included changes to:

  • Codify arbitrators’ duties of disclosure.  
  • Strengthen arbitrator immunity around resignation and removal.   
  • Formalize the power of arbitrators to dispose summarily of issues which have no real prospect of success.   
  • Clarify court powers in support of arbitral proceedings and emergency arbitrators.  
  • Revise the framework for jurisdiction challenges.   
  • Create a new rule on the governing law of the arbitration agreement. 

However, the decision of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to call a general election in July (rather than in the autumn as expected) brought all parliamentary business to a halt. As a consequence, draft legislation (including the draft Arbitration Bill) that had not passed through all of the necessary parliamentary stages was automatically paused. There is a process in the United Kingdom (UK), a constitutional practice called “wash-up”, where uncontroversial draft legislation can be rapidly finalized in the last few days before Parliament is formally dissolved. However, although uncontroversial, the Arbitration Bill was not captured in this process. 

Interestingly, some commentators have questioned whether the Ministry of Justice (the government department sponsoring the Arbitration Bill) might use this as an opportunity to propose further amendments to the Arbitration Act in light of the much reported English High Court decision in P&ID v Nigeria [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm), in which a multi-billion dollar arbitral award was set aside in light of corruption of the underlying contract and in the parties’ conduct during the arbitral process. This case led to significant debate in the English arbitration community about the role of the Tribunal in addressing issues of fraud and corruption, and whether it should have intervened earlier and more substantively uncovered the corruption at an earlier stage in the process.

In any event, a new Parliament will be constituted shortly after the 4 July election, but will start with a legislative blank slate. There remains a chance that the Bill will pass into law by the end of the year, although it may now by 2025 before we have an amended Arbitration Act.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Amendments to the English Arbitration Act on Hold

In our September 2023 newsletter, we wrote about proposed amendments to the English Arbitration Act as it approaches its 30th anniversary. The proposed amendments were seen as very light touch, but included changes to:

  • Codify arbitrators’ duties of disclosure.  
  • Strengthen arbitrator immunity around resignation and removal.   
  • Formalize the power of arbitrators to dispose summarily of issues which have no real prospect of success.   
  • Clarify court powers in support of arbitral proceedings and emergency arbitrators.  
  • Revise the framework for jurisdiction challenges.   
  • Create a new rule on the governing law of the arbitration agreement. 

However, the decision of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to call a general election in July (rather than in the autumn as expected) brought all parliamentary business to a halt. As a consequence, draft legislation (including the draft Arbitration Bill) that had not passed through all of the necessary parliamentary stages was automatically paused. There is a process in the United Kingdom (UK), a constitutional practice called “wash-up”, where uncontroversial draft legislation can be rapidly finalized in the last few days before Parliament is formally dissolved. However, although uncontroversial, the Arbitration Bill was not captured in this process. 

Interestingly, some commentators have questioned whether the Ministry of Justice (the government department sponsoring the Arbitration Bill) might use this as an opportunity to propose further amendments to the Arbitration Act in light of the much reported English High Court decision in P&ID v Nigeria [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm), in which a multi-billion dollar arbitral award was set aside in light of corruption of the underlying contract and in the parties’ conduct during the arbitral process. This case led to significant debate in the English arbitration community about the role of the Tribunal in addressing issues of fraud and corruption, and whether it should have intervened earlier and more substantively uncovered the corruption at an earlier stage in the process.

In any event, a new Parliament will be constituted shortly after the 4 July election, but will start with a legislative blank slate. There remains a chance that the Bill will pass into law by the end of the year, although it may now by 2025 before we have an amended Arbitration Act.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Podcasts

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.

July 15, 2026

Publications

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report

Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

July 14, 2026

Publications

Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law

Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.

July 7, 2026

Publications

In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision

Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.

July 1, 2026

Event

Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference

On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.

July 1, 2026