US Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Civil Rights Enforcement in Williams v. Reed Case

In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, the Supreme Court reversed the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision and established a significant precedent regarding the burden of entry to bring federal civil rights claims in state court.

This case presented complex questions about federalism, administrative law, and civil rights enforcement. Partner Adam Unikowsky sucessfully argued the case before SCOTUS in October 2024. For his work on this case, Adam was featured in The American Lawyer's Litigator of the Week shout outs

Jenner represented 21 unemployed workers in Alabama who sought to challenge extreme delays in the processing of their unemployment benefits or denials of benefits without adequate notice. The Alabama Department of Labor had effectively created a bureaucratic black hole, where applicants’ appeals languished without hearings or were rejected without explanation.

Alabama's courts had ruled that applicants could not sue over processing delays until they had exhausted the very administrative process that was not functioning well.  The Court wrote that the unacceptable implication of the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion was "you can never challenge delays in the administrative process." The Court recognized this created an impermissible immunity shield for state officials against Section 1983 claims.

The implications of the SCOTUS decision extend far beyond unemployment benefits. It establishes an important principle that states cannot create procedural barriers that effectively immunize officials from accountability under federal civil rights laws.

In addition to Adam, the Jenner team included Associates Arjun Ramamurti and Emanuel Powell III. The team worked in partnership with the UChicago Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

US Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Civil Rights Enforcement in Williams v. Reed Case

In a 5-4 opinion by Justice Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, the Supreme Court reversed the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision and established a significant precedent regarding the burden of entry to bring federal civil rights claims in state court.

This case presented complex questions about federalism, administrative law, and civil rights enforcement. Partner Adam Unikowsky sucessfully argued the case before SCOTUS in October 2024. For his work on this case, Adam was featured in The American Lawyer's Litigator of the Week shout outs

Jenner represented 21 unemployed workers in Alabama who sought to challenge extreme delays in the processing of their unemployment benefits or denials of benefits without adequate notice. The Alabama Department of Labor had effectively created a bureaucratic black hole, where applicants’ appeals languished without hearings or were rejected without explanation.

Alabama's courts had ruled that applicants could not sue over processing delays until they had exhausted the very administrative process that was not functioning well.  The Court wrote that the unacceptable implication of the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion was "you can never challenge delays in the administrative process." The Court recognized this created an impermissible immunity shield for state officials against Section 1983 claims.

The implications of the SCOTUS decision extend far beyond unemployment benefits. It establishes an important principle that states cannot create procedural barriers that effectively immunize officials from accountability under federal civil rights laws.

In addition to Adam, the Jenner team included Associates Arjun Ramamurti and Emanuel Powell III. The team worked in partnership with the UChicago Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair

On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.

September 18, 2026

Publications

In American Banker, Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Weighs in on OCC's Handling of Fintech Bank Charter Applications

Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon spoke with American Banker about how the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is approaching bank charter applications from fintechs, amid a growing wave of companies seeking charters from federal regulators.

August 18, 2026

Event

Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI

On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).

August 17, 2026

Publications

In Law360, Trump Debarment Threat Calls for Targeted Defense Plan

Partners Ashley Callen and David Robbins authored an article for Law360 examining how entities should respond when suspension or debarment is threatened directly by the president, rather than initiated through the usual agency-driven process.

August 6, 2026