Jenner & Block Secures Victory in Seventh Circuit Anti-Kickback Statute Appeal
News
April 15, 2025
In an important decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit took the rare step in United States v. Sorensen of overturning a defendant’s conviction under the Anti-Kickback Statute, establishing important new boundaries for the statute’s application to healthcare advertising and marketing. This case is the Seventh Circuit’s first comprehensive examination of how the statute applies to advertising and marketing arrangements in the healthcare sector.
Co-Chair of the firm’s Appellate and Supreme Court Practice Annie Kastanek and Stephen Chahn Lee of the Law Office of Stephen Chahn Lee represented Mr. Sorensen in challenging his conviction on appeal. Mr. Sorensen was found guilty of violating the federal Anti-Kickback Statute in connection with his ownership of SyMed Inc. The appellate court reversed his conviction, ruling that payments for advertising and marketing services for medical equipment do not violate the Anti-Kickback Statute when physicians maintain independent decision-making authority over patient care.
Annie and Stephen successfully persuaded the Court to adopt a narrower and more precise interpretation of the law that prevents prosecutorial overreach while still preserving the statute’s core purpose.
The court drew a critical distinction between two types of payments: illegal kickbacks to those who can influence healthcare decisions versus legitimate compensation for advertising services. Judge Hamilton, writing for the unanimous panel, noted that while the statute can apply to non-physicians, it requires evidence that the payee "leverages fluid, informal power and influence over healthcare decisions."
The Seventh Circuit's decision concludes this hard-fought appeal and establishes crucial guardrails around prosecutorial discretion in Anti-Kickback Statute cases, finding that percentage-based compensation structures are not inherently unlawful under the statute.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
April 15, 2025
In an important decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit took the rare step in United States v. Sorensen of overturning a defendant’s conviction under the Anti-Kickback Statute, establishing important new boundaries for the statute’s application to healthcare advertising and marketing. This case is the Seventh Circuit’s first comprehensive examination of how the statute applies to advertising and marketing arrangements in the healthcare sector.
Co-Chair of the firm’s Appellate and Supreme Court Practice Annie Kastanek and Stephen Chahn Lee of the Law Office of Stephen Chahn Lee represented Mr. Sorensen in challenging his conviction on appeal. Mr. Sorensen was found guilty of violating the federal Anti-Kickback Statute in connection with his ownership of SyMed Inc. The appellate court reversed his conviction, ruling that payments for advertising and marketing services for medical equipment do not violate the Anti-Kickback Statute when physicians maintain independent decision-making authority over patient care.
Annie and Stephen successfully persuaded the Court to adopt a narrower and more precise interpretation of the law that prevents prosecutorial overreach while still preserving the statute’s core purpose.
The court drew a critical distinction between two types of payments: illegal kickbacks to those who can influence healthcare decisions versus legitimate compensation for advertising services. Judge Hamilton, writing for the unanimous panel, noted that while the statute can apply to non-physicians, it requires evidence that the payee "leverages fluid, informal power and influence over healthcare decisions."
The Seventh Circuit's decision concludes this hard-fought appeal and establishes crucial guardrails around prosecutorial discretion in Anti-Kickback Statute cases, finding that percentage-based compensation structures are not inherently unlawful under the statute.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026
Publications
In Employee Relations Law Journal: What Happens When ERISA Disability Deadlines Slip
Partner Joseph Torres along with Associates Emma O'Connor and Christopher LeWarne, authored an article for the Employee Relations Law Journal analyzing a significant Fourth Circuit decision with substantial consequences for ERISA disability plan administrators.
June 23, 2026