Firm Team Authors Amicus Brief in Important First Amendment Case on Behalf of Former US Magistrate Judges
News
June 3, 2021
A firm team represented a group of former US magistrate judges as amici curiae in urging the Supreme Court to take up the case American Civil Liberties Union v. United States, which asks whether there is a qualified right of access under the First Amendment to significant legal opinions issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). The FISC decides critical questions about electronic surveillance and other government investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes, yet despite their treatment of fundamental constitutional and statutory issues, FISC opinions usually are not shared with the public.
The amicus brief argues that the Court should grant certiorari to decide on the existence of a qualified First Amendment right of access. The team drew upon magistrate judges’ history of safely providing public access to opinions on emerging surveillance technology while accommodating national security interests – a legacy that extends to FISC judges, who are also well suited to ordering appropriate disclosures. The team also argued that a qualified right of access to significant FISC opinions would provide magistrate judges with crucial guidance on emerging surveillance law issues and reduce the impact of prosecutorial discretion in shaping the underlying law.
The firm team represented several former magistrate judges, including Hon. James Orenstein, who has authored published decisions on location tracking, non-disclosure orders under the Stored Communications Act, and the compelled decryption of mobile devices. The underlying cert petition was filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute and the American Civil Liberties Union.
The Jenner & Block team included Partner Jessica Ring Amunson and Associates Tali R. Leinwand and Anna Windemuth.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News
June 3, 2021
A firm team represented a group of former US magistrate judges as amici curiae in urging the Supreme Court to take up the case American Civil Liberties Union v. United States, which asks whether there is a qualified right of access under the First Amendment to significant legal opinions issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). The FISC decides critical questions about electronic surveillance and other government investigative actions for foreign intelligence purposes, yet despite their treatment of fundamental constitutional and statutory issues, FISC opinions usually are not shared with the public.
The amicus brief argues that the Court should grant certiorari to decide on the existence of a qualified First Amendment right of access. The team drew upon magistrate judges’ history of safely providing public access to opinions on emerging surveillance technology while accommodating national security interests – a legacy that extends to FISC judges, who are also well suited to ordering appropriate disclosures. The team also argued that a qualified right of access to significant FISC opinions would provide magistrate judges with crucial guidance on emerging surveillance law issues and reduce the impact of prosecutorial discretion in shaping the underlying law.
The firm team represented several former magistrate judges, including Hon. James Orenstein, who has authored published decisions on location tracking, non-disclosure orders under the Stored Communications Act, and the compelled decryption of mobile devices. The underlying cert petition was filed by the Knight First Amendment Institute and the American Civil Liberties Union.
The Jenner & Block team included Partner Jessica Ring Amunson and Associates Tali R. Leinwand and Anna Windemuth.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Podcasts
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon Discusses Fintech Enforcement, Debanking, and Regulatory Risk on Fintech Layer Cake Podcast
Partner Laurel Loomis Rimon was featured on the Fintech Layer Cake podcast, where she discussed how fintech enforcement and prosecution actually work in practice, and what exposes fintechs and banks to regulatory risk.
July 15, 2026
Publications
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act, Private Equity Law Report
Partners Charles Riely, Todd C. Toral, and Martin Glass authored a guest article for Private Equity Law Report examining the US Supreme Court's June 11, 2026, ruling on the scope of private rights of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
July 14, 2026
Publications
Emily Loeb Discusses Congressional Oversight Preparedness in Bloomberg Law
Partner Emily Loeb, co-chair of Jenner & Block's Congressional Investigations Practice, spoke with Bloomberg Law article about how companies can prepare for potential oversight exposure ahead of this fall's midterm elections.
July 7, 2026
Publications
In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision
Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.
July 1, 2026
Event
Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference
On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.
July 1, 2026