FTC Announces 2025 HSR Thresholds
On January 10, 2025, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved new premerger notification thresholds and revised filing fees under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR). These new thresholds will apply to all transactions that close on or after the effective date of the notice, which is 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register, and are expected to take effect on or after February 12, 2025.
In general, filing an HSR premerger notification is required when the value of the transaction reaches a certain threshold (the “Size-of-Transaction” test), the parties are of sufficient size (the “Size-of-Person” test), and no statutory exemption is applicable. Under the HSR Act, the FTC is required to update the jurisdictional thresholds annually, based on the change in gross national product.
Revised Thresholds
- Transactions valued up to and including $126.4 million are not reportable.
- Transactions valued at more than $126.4 million, but less than $505.8 million are reportable if they meet the Size-of-Person test.
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
- The larger party to the transaction has total assets or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more; and
- The smaller party has total assets or annual net sales of $25.3 million or more.
- There are nuances to the Size-of-Person test that must be considered for each transaction. For example, if the smaller party is the acquired person and does not engage in manufacturing, the test is met only if that person has total assets of $25.3 million or more, or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more.
- Transactions valued at $505.8 million or more are reportable, regardless of the size of the parties (unless an exemption applies).
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
|
Test |
2024 Threshold ($USD) |
Revised 2025 Threshold ($USD) |
|
Size-of-Transaction Test Minimum transaction value that triggers reporting obligation, when Size-of-Person Test is also met (and no exemption applies) |
> $119.5 million |
> $126.4 million |
|
Size-of-Person Test To satisfy the Size-of-Person test, one party to the transaction must meet the “larger” test and the other must meet the “smaller” test. |
One party has at least $239 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $23.9 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $23.9 million in assets or $239 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
One party has at least $252.9 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $25.3 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $25.3 million in assets or $252.9 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
|
Size-of-Transaction Threshold at Which Size-of-Person Test Does Not Apply |
> $478 million |
> $505.8 million |
Filing Fees
Furthermore, the FTC provided updates to its filing fees, which are described in detail below.
|
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
|
Less than $179.4 million |
$30,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $179.4 million but less than $555.5 million |
$105,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $555.5 million but less than $1.111 billion |
$265,000 |
|
Not less than $1.111 billion but less than $2.222 billion |
$425,000 |
|
Not less than $2.222 billion but less than $5.555 billion |
$850,000 |
|
Not less than $5.555 billion or more |
$2,390,000 |
2025 Interlocking Directorate Enforcement Thresholds
Additionally, the FTC announced its annual updates to the Clayton Act Section 8 enforcement thresholds. Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits simultaneous service by officers or directors of two competing corporations (known as an “interlocking directorate”) if certain thresholds are met. These thresholds are effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Under the new thresholds, an interlocking directorate is forbidden where:
- Each competitor corporation has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $51,380,000 ($48,559,000 in 2024); and
- Both competitor corporations have competitive sales of more than $5,138,000 ($4,855,900 in 2024).
Main Takeaway
The HSR Act requires parties to report transactions for the purchase or sale of voting securities, non-corporate interests, or assets to submit premerger notification filings to the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice. HSR notification filings involve complex rules regarding valuation and exemptions that change regularly, and noncompliance with the Act carries serious penalties. Parties should seek counsel specialized in HSR filings as early in the process as possible, to determine whether a transaction is reportable and to assess regulatory risk.
In general, filing an HSR premerger notification is required when the value of the transaction reaches a certain threshold (the “Size-of-Transaction” test), the parties are of sufficient size (the “Size-of-Person” test), and no statutory exemption is applicable. Under the HSR Act, the FTC is required to update the jurisdictional thresholds annually, based on the change in gross national product.
Revised Thresholds
- Transactions valued up to and including $126.4 million are not reportable.
- Transactions valued at more than $126.4 million, but less than $505.8 million are reportable if they meet the Size-of-Person test.
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
- The larger party to the transaction has total assets or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more; and
- The smaller party has total assets or annual net sales of $25.3 million or more.
- There are nuances to the Size-of-Person test that must be considered for each transaction. For example, if the smaller party is the acquired person and does not engage in manufacturing, the test is met only if that person has total assets of $25.3 million or more, or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more.
- Transactions valued at $505.8 million or more are reportable, regardless of the size of the parties (unless an exemption applies).
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
|
Test |
2024 Threshold ($USD) |
Revised 2025 Threshold ($USD) |
|
Size-of-Transaction Test Minimum transaction value that triggers reporting obligation, when Size-of-Person Test is also met (and no exemption applies) |
> $119.5 million |
> $126.4 million |
|
Size-of-Person Test To satisfy the Size-of-Person test, one party to the transaction must meet the “larger” test and the other must meet the “smaller” test. |
One party has at least $239 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $23.9 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $23.9 million in assets or $239 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
One party has at least $252.9 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $25.3 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $25.3 million in assets or $252.9 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
|
Size-of-Transaction Threshold at Which Size-of-Person Test Does Not Apply |
> $478 million |
> $505.8 million |
Filing Fees
Furthermore, the FTC provided updates to its filing fees, which are described in detail below.
|
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
|
Less than $179.4 million |
$30,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $179.4 million but less than $555.5 million |
$105,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $555.5 million but less than $1.111 billion |
$265,000 |
|
Not less than $1.111 billion but less than $2.222 billion |
$425,000 |
|
Not less than $2.222 billion but less than $5.555 billion |
$850,000 |
|
Not less than $5.555 billion or more |
$2,390,000 |
2025 Interlocking Directorate Enforcement Thresholds
Additionally, the FTC announced its annual updates to the Clayton Act Section 8 enforcement thresholds. Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits simultaneous service by officers or directors of two competing corporations (known as an “interlocking directorate”) if certain thresholds are met. These thresholds are effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Under the new thresholds, an interlocking directorate is forbidden where:
- Each competitor corporation has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $51,380,000 ($48,559,000 in 2024); and
- Both competitor corporations have competitive sales of more than $5,138,000 ($4,855,900 in 2024).
Main Takeaway
The HSR Act requires parties to report transactions for the purchase or sale of voting securities, non-corporate interests, or assets to submit premerger notification filings to the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice. HSR notification filings involve complex rules regarding valuation and exemptions that change regularly, and noncompliance with the Act carries serious penalties. Parties should seek counsel specialized in HSR filings as early in the process as possible, to determine whether a transaction is reportable and to assess regulatory risk.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
On January 10, 2025, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved new premerger notification thresholds and revised filing fees under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR). These new thresholds will apply to all transactions that close on or after the effective date of the notice, which is 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register, and are expected to take effect on or after February 12, 2025.
In general, filing an HSR premerger notification is required when the value of the transaction reaches a certain threshold (the “Size-of-Transaction” test), the parties are of sufficient size (the “Size-of-Person” test), and no statutory exemption is applicable. Under the HSR Act, the FTC is required to update the jurisdictional thresholds annually, based on the change in gross national product.
Revised Thresholds
- Transactions valued up to and including $126.4 million are not reportable.
- Transactions valued at more than $126.4 million, but less than $505.8 million are reportable if they meet the Size-of-Person test.
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
- The larger party to the transaction has total assets or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more; and
- The smaller party has total assets or annual net sales of $25.3 million or more.
- There are nuances to the Size-of-Person test that must be considered for each transaction. For example, if the smaller party is the acquired person and does not engage in manufacturing, the test is met only if that person has total assets of $25.3 million or more, or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more.
- Transactions valued at $505.8 million or more are reportable, regardless of the size of the parties (unless an exemption applies).
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
|
Test |
2024 Threshold ($USD) |
Revised 2025 Threshold ($USD) |
|
Size-of-Transaction Test Minimum transaction value that triggers reporting obligation, when Size-of-Person Test is also met (and no exemption applies) |
> $119.5 million |
> $126.4 million |
|
Size-of-Person Test To satisfy the Size-of-Person test, one party to the transaction must meet the “larger” test and the other must meet the “smaller” test. |
One party has at least $239 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $23.9 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $23.9 million in assets or $239 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
One party has at least $252.9 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $25.3 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $25.3 million in assets or $252.9 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
|
Size-of-Transaction Threshold at Which Size-of-Person Test Does Not Apply |
> $478 million |
> $505.8 million |
Filing Fees
Furthermore, the FTC provided updates to its filing fees, which are described in detail below.
|
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
|
Less than $179.4 million |
$30,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $179.4 million but less than $555.5 million |
$105,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $555.5 million but less than $1.111 billion |
$265,000 |
|
Not less than $1.111 billion but less than $2.222 billion |
$425,000 |
|
Not less than $2.222 billion but less than $5.555 billion |
$850,000 |
|
Not less than $5.555 billion or more |
$2,390,000 |
2025 Interlocking Directorate Enforcement Thresholds
Additionally, the FTC announced its annual updates to the Clayton Act Section 8 enforcement thresholds. Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits simultaneous service by officers or directors of two competing corporations (known as an “interlocking directorate”) if certain thresholds are met. These thresholds are effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Under the new thresholds, an interlocking directorate is forbidden where:
- Each competitor corporation has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $51,380,000 ($48,559,000 in 2024); and
- Both competitor corporations have competitive sales of more than $5,138,000 ($4,855,900 in 2024).
Main Takeaway
The HSR Act requires parties to report transactions for the purchase or sale of voting securities, non-corporate interests, or assets to submit premerger notification filings to the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice. HSR notification filings involve complex rules regarding valuation and exemptions that change regularly, and noncompliance with the Act carries serious penalties. Parties should seek counsel specialized in HSR filings as early in the process as possible, to determine whether a transaction is reportable and to assess regulatory risk.
In general, filing an HSR premerger notification is required when the value of the transaction reaches a certain threshold (the “Size-of-Transaction” test), the parties are of sufficient size (the “Size-of-Person” test), and no statutory exemption is applicable. Under the HSR Act, the FTC is required to update the jurisdictional thresholds annually, based on the change in gross national product.
Revised Thresholds
- Transactions valued up to and including $126.4 million are not reportable.
- Transactions valued at more than $126.4 million, but less than $505.8 million are reportable if they meet the Size-of-Person test.
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
- The larger party to the transaction has total assets or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more; and
- The smaller party has total assets or annual net sales of $25.3 million or more.
- There are nuances to the Size-of-Person test that must be considered for each transaction. For example, if the smaller party is the acquired person and does not engage in manufacturing, the test is met only if that person has total assets of $25.3 million or more, or annual net sales of $252.9 million or more.
- Transactions valued at $505.8 million or more are reportable, regardless of the size of the parties (unless an exemption applies).
- Generally, the Size-of-Person test is met when:
|
Test |
2024 Threshold ($USD) |
Revised 2025 Threshold ($USD) |
|
Size-of-Transaction Test Minimum transaction value that triggers reporting obligation, when Size-of-Person Test is also met (and no exemption applies) |
> $119.5 million |
> $126.4 million |
|
Size-of-Person Test To satisfy the Size-of-Person test, one party to the transaction must meet the “larger” test and the other must meet the “smaller” test. |
One party has at least $239 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $23.9 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $23.9 million in assets or $239 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
One party has at least $252.9 million in assets or annual net sales (the larger test). AND The other party has at least $25.3 million in assets or annual net sales; or, if the acquired party engaged in manufacturing has at least $25.3 million in assets or $252.9 million in annual net sales (the smaller test). |
|
Size-of-Transaction Threshold at Which Size-of-Person Test Does Not Apply |
> $478 million |
> $505.8 million |
Filing Fees
Furthermore, the FTC provided updates to its filing fees, which are described in detail below.
|
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
New Size of Transaction under the Act |
|
Less than $179.4 million |
$30,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $179.4 million but less than $555.5 million |
$105,000 (No change) |
|
Not less than $555.5 million but less than $1.111 billion |
$265,000 |
|
Not less than $1.111 billion but less than $2.222 billion |
$425,000 |
|
Not less than $2.222 billion but less than $5.555 billion |
$850,000 |
|
Not less than $5.555 billion or more |
$2,390,000 |
2025 Interlocking Directorate Enforcement Thresholds
Additionally, the FTC announced its annual updates to the Clayton Act Section 8 enforcement thresholds. Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits simultaneous service by officers or directors of two competing corporations (known as an “interlocking directorate”) if certain thresholds are met. These thresholds are effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Under the new thresholds, an interlocking directorate is forbidden where:
- Each competitor corporation has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $51,380,000 ($48,559,000 in 2024); and
- Both competitor corporations have competitive sales of more than $5,138,000 ($4,855,900 in 2024).
Main Takeaway
The HSR Act requires parties to report transactions for the purchase or sale of voting securities, non-corporate interests, or assets to submit premerger notification filings to the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice. HSR notification filings involve complex rules regarding valuation and exemptions that change regularly, and noncompliance with the Act carries serious penalties. Parties should seek counsel specialized in HSR filings as early in the process as possible, to determine whether a transaction is reportable and to assess regulatory risk.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026
Recognition
Jenner & Block Rises in American Lawyer Rankings for Summer Associate Experience
Jenner & Block ranked 14th nationally in The American Lawyer’s 2026 Summer Associate Satisfaction Survey, jumping 10 spots from last year. The annual survey measures summer associate satisfaction at US law firms based on ratings provided directly by summer associates across key firm qualities.
October 2, 2026