Substantial Trade Secret Verdicts Continue with $452 Million Decision Against South Korean Company

US civil juries have returned a number of substantial trade secret verdicts against defendants over the past decade. In December 2024, a company from South Korea became the most recent defendant on the receiving end of a large trade secret jury verdict.

The lawsuit was brought by a company called Insulet. The case was filed on August 2, 2023 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and assigned case number 23-11780-FDS. The dispute involved information regarding the design, manufacturing process, and functionality of an insulin delivery system marketed by Insulet under the name Omnipod. The complaint filed by Insulet identified the product at issue as “Insulet’s first-of-its-kind ‘patch pump,’ a compact, wearable, waterproof, adhesive medical device that delivers insulin to people with insulin-dependent diabetes.” The complaint alleged that more than $600 million was invested in nearly two decades of work to bring Insulet’s product to market, whereas defendant EOFlow’s product was brought to market in South Korea in just five years, after EOFlow hired former employees of Insulet and gained access to trade secret information.

The case received media attention previously after a preliminary injunction was entered by the District Court, but the injunction was then reversed by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a sternly worded decision.

In December 2024, after a lengthy trial, the Massachusetts jury concluded that corporate defendants EOFlow, Inc., EOFlow Co., Ltd., and Nephria Bio, Inc., along with three individuals, misappropriated multiple trade secrets of Insulet. According to Insulet’s counsel, the jury awarded Insulet $170 million in compensatory damages and “also found that the misappropriation of three of Insulet’s trade secrets was willful and malicious and awarded an additional $282 million in exemplary or punitive damages, for a total damages award of $452 million.”

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Substantial Trade Secret Verdicts Continue with $452 Million Decision Against South Korean Company

US civil juries have returned a number of substantial trade secret verdicts against defendants over the past decade. In December 2024, a company from South Korea became the most recent defendant on the receiving end of a large trade secret jury verdict.

The lawsuit was brought by a company called Insulet. The case was filed on August 2, 2023 in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and assigned case number 23-11780-FDS. The dispute involved information regarding the design, manufacturing process, and functionality of an insulin delivery system marketed by Insulet under the name Omnipod. The complaint filed by Insulet identified the product at issue as “Insulet’s first-of-its-kind ‘patch pump,’ a compact, wearable, waterproof, adhesive medical device that delivers insulin to people with insulin-dependent diabetes.” The complaint alleged that more than $600 million was invested in nearly two decades of work to bring Insulet’s product to market, whereas defendant EOFlow’s product was brought to market in South Korea in just five years, after EOFlow hired former employees of Insulet and gained access to trade secret information.

The case received media attention previously after a preliminary injunction was entered by the District Court, but the injunction was then reversed by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a sternly worded decision.

In December 2024, after a lengthy trial, the Massachusetts jury concluded that corporate defendants EOFlow, Inc., EOFlow Co., Ltd., and Nephria Bio, Inc., along with three individuals, misappropriated multiple trade secrets of Insulet. According to Insulet’s counsel, the jury awarded Insulet $170 million in compensatory damages and “also found that the misappropriation of three of Insulet’s trade secrets was willful and malicious and awarded an additional $282 million in exemplary or punitive damages, for a total damages award of $452 million.”

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Publications

In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision

Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.

July 1, 2026

Event

Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference

On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.

July 1, 2026

Publications

In Employee Relations Law Journal: What Happens When ERISA Disability Deadlines Slip

Partner Joseph Torres along with Associates Emma O'Connor and Christopher LeWarne, authored an article for the Employee Relations Law Journal analyzing a significant Fourth Circuit decision with substantial consequences for ERISA disability plan administrators.

June 23, 2026

Publications

In Law360, Partner Samuel Feder Analyzes the Supreme Court's Ruling in FCC v. AT&T

Partner Sam Feder authored an article in Law360 examining the Supreme Court's June 4 decision in Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., which rejected AT&T's and Verizon's argument that the FCC's forfeiture process violates the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.

June 16, 2026