Jenner & Block Secures 8-1 Supreme Court Victory in Supervised Release Case, Resolving Circuit Split

Jenner & Block Partner Adam Unikowsky and Associate Jonathan (Yoni) J. Marshall secured an 8-1 victory at the Supreme Court in Rico v. United States, successfully arguing that courts cannot automatically extend a defendant's term of federal supervised release when she absconds from supervision.

The case presented the question of whether the fugitive-tolling doctrine—the principle that a defendant should not receive credit toward their sentence for time spent as a fugitive—applies in the supervised release context. Adam and Yoni argued that the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 contains no textual support for extending the doctrine to supervised release. In an 8-1 decision authored by Justice Gorsuch, the Supreme Court agreed, holding that courts cannot create a fugitive tolling doctrine where Congress has not authorized one.

The ruling resolves a circuit split in which five courts had sided with the government and only two with the defendant. With more than 109,000 individuals subject to federal supervised release, the decision has broad implications for how federal courts exercise sentencing authority.

Adam and Yoni joined the case at the Supreme Court stage, filing the successful petition for certiorari granted in June 2025 and the merits briefs. Adam argued before the Court on November 3, 2025.

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Jenner & Block Secures 8-1 Supreme Court Victory in Supervised Release Case, Resolving Circuit Split

Jenner & Block Partner Adam Unikowsky and Associate Jonathan (Yoni) J. Marshall secured an 8-1 victory at the Supreme Court in Rico v. United States, successfully arguing that courts cannot automatically extend a defendant's term of federal supervised release when she absconds from supervision.

The case presented the question of whether the fugitive-tolling doctrine—the principle that a defendant should not receive credit toward their sentence for time spent as a fugitive—applies in the supervised release context. Adam and Yoni argued that the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 contains no textual support for extending the doctrine to supervised release. In an 8-1 decision authored by Justice Gorsuch, the Supreme Court agreed, holding that courts cannot create a fugitive tolling doctrine where Congress has not authorized one.

The ruling resolves a circuit split in which five courts had sided with the government and only two with the defendant. With more than 109,000 individuals subject to federal supervised release, the decision has broad implications for how federal courts exercise sentencing authority.

Adam and Yoni joined the case at the Supreme Court stage, filing the successful petition for certiorari granted in June 2025 and the merits briefs. Adam argued before the Court on November 3, 2025.

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Publications

In New York Law Journal, The True Lender Doctrine and the OppFi Decision

Partners Jeremy Creelan, Michael Ross, Megan Poetzel, and Laurel Loomis Rimon, and Associate Molly Oberstein-Allen authored an article for the New York Law Journal examining the "True Lender" doctrine in light of a May 2026 California decision that provides the most detailed judicial framework to date for evaluating bank-nonbank lending partnerships.

July 1, 2026

Event

Partner Michael Vernick to Speak at NACUA's 2026 Annual Conference

On July 1, Partner Michael Vernick will speak on a panel at the National Association of College and University Attorneys (NACUA) 2026 Annual Conference in Nashville.

July 1, 2026

Publications

In Employee Relations Law Journal: What Happens When ERISA Disability Deadlines Slip

Partner Joseph Torres along with Associates Emma O'Connor and Christopher LeWarne, authored an article for the Employee Relations Law Journal analyzing a significant Fourth Circuit decision with substantial consequences for ERISA disability plan administrators.

June 23, 2026

Publications

In Law360, Partner Samuel Feder Analyzes the Supreme Court's Ruling in FCC v. AT&T

Partner Sam Feder authored an article in Law360 examining the Supreme Court's June 4 decision in Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., which rejected AT&T's and Verizon's argument that the FCC's forfeiture process violates the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial.

June 16, 2026