Annual GAO Bid Protest Statistics: Filings Down, But Relief Rate Steady

On December 12, 2025, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2025. This report, required by the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, provides Congress GAO’s bid protest statistics covering fiscal year 2025, including the most prevalent reasons GAO sustained protests. The 2025 GAO report reveals that bid protest filings were down 6% as compared to last year (1,688 in FY 2025 as opposed to 1,803 in FY 2024). Aside from an increase in FY 2023—attributed to a large procurement resulting in numerous protests—bid protest activity at GAO has been steadily decreasing for several years as shown in the top row of the below table:

Bid Protest Statistics

In fact, in a separate GAO report from this summer, GAO highlighted the downward trend in filings over the past decade. Since the recent highwater mark in 2016, filings have decreased 39% overall:    

Graph of Percentage and Number of Protest Case Filings at GAO

This past fiscal year, GAO resolved the merits of 380 of the 1,688 cases filed, reflecting the lowest number of cases in recent history. The remaining cases were dismissed or the protestor withdrew the protest. In sum, GAO sustained 53 protests, reflecting an approximate 14% sustain rate. The “Effectiveness Rate”—the percentage of cases where the protestor obtained some form of relief either through the procuring agency taking voluntary corrective action or the GAO sustaining the protest—remained the same as FY 2024, at 52%. Thus, last year, protesters obtained some relief in more than half of the cases filed. Indeed, GAO’s Effectiveness Rate has remained relatively steady even as the number of protest filings continues to drop. GAO further reported that it conducted a hearing in three cases (continuing the relatively rare usage of this procedure), and notably, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) was markedly down 31% last year (53 ADR cases in 2025 versus 76 ADR cases in 2024). However, when GAO undertook ADR, that process proved successful in 91% of the cases, which remains consistent with the last four fiscal years. 

Finally, GAO reported that the three most prevalent grounds resulting in GAO sustaining a bid protest were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) unreasonable cost or price evaluation; and (3) unreasonable rejection of an offeror’s proposal. This year, unreasonable rejection of a proposal supplanted “flawed selection decision,” but the other two grounds remained in the top three reasons supporting GAO’s sustain decisions.

Jenner & Block’s Government Contracts lawyers have extensive bid protest experience, including prior service as a supervising bid protest hearing officer at GAO, and stand ready to support any challenges to the award of a government contract or the terms of a solicitation.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Annual GAO Bid Protest Statistics: Filings Down, But Relief Rate Steady

On December 12, 2025, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2025. This report, required by the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, provides Congress GAO’s bid protest statistics covering fiscal year 2025, including the most prevalent reasons GAO sustained protests. The 2025 GAO report reveals that bid protest filings were down 6% as compared to last year (1,688 in FY 2025 as opposed to 1,803 in FY 2024). Aside from an increase in FY 2023—attributed to a large procurement resulting in numerous protests—bid protest activity at GAO has been steadily decreasing for several years as shown in the top row of the below table:

Bid Protest Statistics

In fact, in a separate GAO report from this summer, GAO highlighted the downward trend in filings over the past decade. Since the recent highwater mark in 2016, filings have decreased 39% overall:    

Graph of Percentage and Number of Protest Case Filings at GAO

This past fiscal year, GAO resolved the merits of 380 of the 1,688 cases filed, reflecting the lowest number of cases in recent history. The remaining cases were dismissed or the protestor withdrew the protest. In sum, GAO sustained 53 protests, reflecting an approximate 14% sustain rate. The “Effectiveness Rate”—the percentage of cases where the protestor obtained some form of relief either through the procuring agency taking voluntary corrective action or the GAO sustaining the protest—remained the same as FY 2024, at 52%. Thus, last year, protesters obtained some relief in more than half of the cases filed. Indeed, GAO’s Effectiveness Rate has remained relatively steady even as the number of protest filings continues to drop. GAO further reported that it conducted a hearing in three cases (continuing the relatively rare usage of this procedure), and notably, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) was markedly down 31% last year (53 ADR cases in 2025 versus 76 ADR cases in 2024). However, when GAO undertook ADR, that process proved successful in 91% of the cases, which remains consistent with the last four fiscal years. 

Finally, GAO reported that the three most prevalent grounds resulting in GAO sustaining a bid protest were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) unreasonable cost or price evaluation; and (3) unreasonable rejection of an offeror’s proposal. This year, unreasonable rejection of a proposal supplanted “flawed selection decision,” but the other two grounds remained in the top three reasons supporting GAO’s sustain decisions.

Jenner & Block’s Government Contracts lawyers have extensive bid protest experience, including prior service as a supervising bid protest hearing officer at GAO, and stand ready to support any challenges to the award of a government contract or the terms of a solicitation.

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar

As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.

October 14, 2026

Publications

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.

October 2026

Event

Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”

On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.

October 8, 2026

Event

Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference

On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

October 7, 2026

Publications

The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine

Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.

October 5, 2026