Client Alert: Practical Implications of Supreme Court's Decision Related to SEC's Disgorgement Remedy
Publications
June 30, 2020
By: Gabriel K. Gillett, Charles D. Riely, Philip B. Sailer, Grace C. Signorelli-Cassady, Howard S. Suskin
An updated version of this alert was published on January 8, 2021. Please find it here.
Disgorgement is the remedy the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has traditionally used to obtain alleged illicit gains in enforcement actions against public companies, registered investment advisers and broker dealers, and other market participants. Last week, in Liu v. S.E.C., the Supreme Court held that the SEC may continue to seek disgorgement, but only where it does not exceed the defendant’s net profits and where it qualifies as equitable relief. The decision answered a question explicitly left open in 2017, in Kokesh v. S.E.C, and preserved the SEC’s ability to use disgorgement to obtain alleged illicit gains in enforcement actions. In doing so, the majority discussed the possibility that disgorgement awards may not be an equitable remedy (and thus not allowed under the relevant statute) where courts decline to deduct expenses from the award, impose joint-and-several liability, or fail to return money to investors. Rather than resolve these issues, though, the Court in Liu provided some guidance and remanded to the lower court to determine how these principles apply in this case. The precise scope of the limitations to the disgorgement remedy thus remains to be seen and likely will be further defined in future litigation.
To read the full article, please click here.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Publications
June 30, 2020
By: Gabriel K. Gillett, Charles D. Riely, Philip B. Sailer, Grace C. Signorelli-Cassady, Howard S. Suskin
An updated version of this alert was published on January 8, 2021. Please find it here.
Disgorgement is the remedy the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has traditionally used to obtain alleged illicit gains in enforcement actions against public companies, registered investment advisers and broker dealers, and other market participants. Last week, in Liu v. S.E.C., the Supreme Court held that the SEC may continue to seek disgorgement, but only where it does not exceed the defendant’s net profits and where it qualifies as equitable relief. The decision answered a question explicitly left open in 2017, in Kokesh v. S.E.C, and preserved the SEC’s ability to use disgorgement to obtain alleged illicit gains in enforcement actions. In doing so, the majority discussed the possibility that disgorgement awards may not be an equitable remedy (and thus not allowed under the relevant statute) where courts decline to deduct expenses from the award, impose joint-and-several liability, or fail to return money to investors. Rather than resolve these issues, though, the Court in Liu provided some guidance and remanded to the lower court to determine how these principles apply in this case. The precise scope of the limitations to the disgorgement remedy thus remains to be seen and likely will be further defined in future litigation.
To read the full article, please click here.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026