An Ohio jury found Goodyear liable for misappropriating five trade secrets related to self-inflating tires in 2022, awarding the plaintiff, Coda Development, $2.8 million in compensatory damages and $61.2 million in punitive damages. Coda Dev. s.r.o. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 160 F.4th 1350, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2025). Following trial, however, the district court threw out the verdict and found in favor of Goodyear because, among other things, Coda had failed to sufficiently define its trade secrets. Id. at 1354.1 The Federal Circuit recently affirmed the decision on appeal. Id. at 1352.
As in many jurisdictions, a trade secret plaintiff asserting a claim under Ohio law must “defin[e] the information for which protection is sought with sufficient definiteness to permit a court to apply the criteria for protection…and to determine the fact of an appropriation.” Id. at 1355 (quoting Caudill Seed & Warehouse Co. v. Jar-row Formulas, Inc., 53 F. 4th 368, 380-81 (6th Cir. 2022)). In accordance with this principle, the district court had ordered Coda to answer an interrogatory calling for “a complete list of trade secrets (with particularity).” Id. at 1356. The district court ultimately concluded that the purported trade secrets that resulted—and which formed the basis of the jury’s verdict—were not sufficiently definite, and the appellate court agreed.
Footnotes
[1] In addition to finding that four of the five alleged trade secrets at issue were not sufficiently definite, the court held that four were not “secret,” four had never been used or disclosed by Goodyear, and two were never conveyed by Coda to Goodyear.
[2] The full identification was “Coda's design and development of a multipurpose interface for transporting air in a self-inflating tire that can connect to the air source, connect to the tire interior, connect to the peristaltic pump, serve as an end to the peristaltic pump, connect to the regulator, carry the regulator, go around or through the bead, go around or through the tire layers, click to the bead and hold the filter.” 160 F. 4th at 1353.
Related Attorneys
Related Articles
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.