For general media inquiries, please contact mediainquiries@jenner.com.
News
Jenner & Block Secures Trial Victory for Chance the Rapper
News
Recognition
Jenner & Block Named Law Firm of the Year, Earned Additional Honors Across Categories by The American Lawyer 2025 Industry Awards
Recognition
Recognition
Chicago Bar Association Names Jenner & Block Law Firm of the Year
Recognition
All News and Insights
Recognitions
The 2021 edition of The Legal 500 United States recognizes Jenner & Block in 24 national practice categories. Of those, the firm received a Tier-1 ranking in the Copyright, Native American Law, and Telecoms and Broadcast (Regulatory) categories.
Publications
A Recent Federal Circuit Decision Has Clouded the District Court’s Gatekeeping Role
The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Barry v. DePuy Synthes Companies reversed a trial court’s exclusion of two expert witnesses, further blurring the line for practitioners between the court’s gatekeeping role and the jury’s role in assessing the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses. The Barry decision split the court 2–1, with Judge Stark authoring the majority opinion and Judge Prost dissenting.
The Federal Circuit Expands Disclaimer of Patent Scope During Prosecution
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Focus Products Group International, LLC v. Kartri Sales Co., Inc., No. 2023-1446 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 30, 2025) reversed summary judgment of infringement on two patents and vacated on a third. The Court held the district court erred in both claim construction and application of its infringement analysis by failing to properly find the patent file history disavowed subject matter relied upon to find infringement. The disavowal was critical beca
Two Federal Circuit Decisions Nullify Nine-Figure Damages Awards
In two June 2025 decisions, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals rejected patent infringement jury verdicts for $218.5 million and $300 million—one reversed for claiming patent ineligible subject matter, and the other vacated due to an improper question on the jury verdict form for infringement.
