$17 Million Attorney Fee Award Aims to Deter Malicious Trade Secret Misappropriation

Singapore-based XP Power has been ordered to pay $17 million in attorneys’ fees to opponent Comet Technologies, USA, following Comet’s victory at trial. The Northern District of California issued the order in January 2025, and it follows a jury award to Comet of $40 million in unjust enrichment damages.

XP Power and Comet Technologies are rival companies, producing products including semiconductor chips, radios, and power supply materials. Comet Technologies sued XP Power in 2020 for alleged trade secret misappropriation. Comet Technologies claimed that XP Power intentionally hired Comet’s top engineers, and that those engineers downloaded confidential information from Comet’s files and took them to XP Power. The case went to trial in 2022. There, the jury agreed that XP Power had willfully misappropriated Comet Technologies’ trade secrets, and that Comet was entitled to $20 million in compensatory damages. The jury awarded an additional $20 million in punitive damages because it found that XP Power acted willfully and maliciously. XP Power unsuccessfully petitioned the court in 2022 for a new trial.

On top of damages at trial, a prevailing party can seek an award of attorneys’ fees in cases of willful trade secret misappropriation. Comet Technologies filed a motion to recover its legal fees. XP Power challenged the fee request on the basis that Comet should not be considered the prevailing party because XP Power voluntarily dismissed many of its claims before trial. The court rejected this theory in granting XP Power’s motion and ordering XP Power to pay $17 million in attorneys’ fees. The award represents more than 20,000 hours of attorney and paralegal time. The court’s ruling expressly stated that the award is meant to deter “malicious trade secret misappropriation” and “encourage trade secret defendants to make reasonable litigation decisions.”

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

$17 Million Attorney Fee Award Aims to Deter Malicious Trade Secret Misappropriation

Singapore-based XP Power has been ordered to pay $17 million in attorneys’ fees to opponent Comet Technologies, USA, following Comet’s victory at trial. The Northern District of California issued the order in January 2025, and it follows a jury award to Comet of $40 million in unjust enrichment damages.

XP Power and Comet Technologies are rival companies, producing products including semiconductor chips, radios, and power supply materials. Comet Technologies sued XP Power in 2020 for alleged trade secret misappropriation. Comet Technologies claimed that XP Power intentionally hired Comet’s top engineers, and that those engineers downloaded confidential information from Comet’s files and took them to XP Power. The case went to trial in 2022. There, the jury agreed that XP Power had willfully misappropriated Comet Technologies’ trade secrets, and that Comet was entitled to $20 million in compensatory damages. The jury awarded an additional $20 million in punitive damages because it found that XP Power acted willfully and maliciously. XP Power unsuccessfully petitioned the court in 2022 for a new trial.

On top of damages at trial, a prevailing party can seek an award of attorneys’ fees in cases of willful trade secret misappropriation. Comet Technologies filed a motion to recover its legal fees. XP Power challenged the fee request on the basis that Comet should not be considered the prevailing party because XP Power voluntarily dismissed many of its claims before trial. The court rejected this theory in granting XP Power’s motion and ordering XP Power to pay $17 million in attorneys’ fees. The award represents more than 20,000 hours of attorney and paralegal time. The court’s ruling expressly stated that the award is meant to deter “malicious trade secret misappropriation” and “encourage trade secret defendants to make reasonable litigation decisions.”

This article is available in the Jenner & Block Japan Newsletter. / この記事はJenner & Blockニュースレターに掲載されています。

Related Capabilities

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar

As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.

October 14, 2026

Publications

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.

October 2026

Event

Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”

On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.

October 8, 2026

Event

Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference

On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

October 7, 2026

Publications

The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine

Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.

October 5, 2026