Client Alert: Government Contractors Obtain Relief in More than Half of GAO Bid Protests
Yesterday, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2022. The statutorily mandated report contains an array of information about GAO’s bid protest forum over the prior fiscal year, including the most prevalent reasons GAO sustained protests along with a variety of statistical data. The big news is that while the number of bid protests filed continued to decline, GAO’s “Effectiveness Rate” held steady.
According to the report, contractors filed 1,658 protests, cost claims, and requests for reconsideration this past fiscal year, which reflects a 12% drop from the prior fiscal year and the lowest number of protests filed since 2008 (1,652). Protest filings are down more than 40% since the recent high-water mark of 2,789 filings in fiscal year 2016. When considering these numbers, it is important to remember that multiple cases can be associated with a single solicitation, either because of supplemental protests or multiple protesters, so the number of procurements challenged are materially fewer than the numbers indicate.
GAO resolved the merits of the protest in 455 of the 1,658 cases filed; the remainder of cases were dismissed by GAO or withdrawn by the protester. GAO sustained 59 (13%) protests—the fewest number of sustain decisions since 2009. Despite these notable decreases and downward trends, GAO’s Effectiveness Rate held relatively steady at 51%. The Effectiveness Rate reflects the percent of cases in which the protester obtained some form of relief, either through voluntary corrective action or a GAO decision sustaining the protest. In other words, in more than half of the cases GAO resolved in fiscal year 2022, the bid protest forum was an effective avenue for the protester to obtain at least some relief.
Surprisingly, GAO held only two hearings in fiscal year 2022, the lowest number in at least 20 years (and far less than the 13 hearings held during 2021). This continues a downward trend in the number of hearings held, although deciding cases through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) remains popular and useful. GAO turned to ADR in 74 protests, and 68 of these ADRs were successful (i.e., the protest was resolved without the need for a written decision on the merits).
Finally, GAO reports that the most prevalent reasons for sustaining bid protests during fiscal year 2022 were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) flawed selection decision; and (3) flawed solicitation.
Jenner & Block’s Government Contracts and Grants Practice has extensive bid protest experience in all relevant bid protest forums, to include GAO. The protest team includes a former supervising bid protest hearing officer at GAO, former Court of Federal Claims clerks, and former Federal Circuit clerks. The team stands ready to assist with bid protests and interventions.
According to the report, contractors filed 1,658 protests, cost claims, and requests for reconsideration this past fiscal year, which reflects a 12% drop from the prior fiscal year and the lowest number of protests filed since 2008 (1,652). Protest filings are down more than 40% since the recent high-water mark of 2,789 filings in fiscal year 2016. When considering these numbers, it is important to remember that multiple cases can be associated with a single solicitation, either because of supplemental protests or multiple protesters, so the number of procurements challenged are materially fewer than the numbers indicate.
GAO resolved the merits of the protest in 455 of the 1,658 cases filed; the remainder of cases were dismissed by GAO or withdrawn by the protester. GAO sustained 59 (13%) protests—the fewest number of sustain decisions since 2009. Despite these notable decreases and downward trends, GAO’s Effectiveness Rate held relatively steady at 51%. The Effectiveness Rate reflects the percent of cases in which the protester obtained some form of relief, either through voluntary corrective action or a GAO decision sustaining the protest. In other words, in more than half of the cases GAO resolved in fiscal year 2022, the bid protest forum was an effective avenue for the protester to obtain at least some relief.
Surprisingly, GAO held only two hearings in fiscal year 2022, the lowest number in at least 20 years (and far less than the 13 hearings held during 2021). This continues a downward trend in the number of hearings held, although deciding cases through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) remains popular and useful. GAO turned to ADR in 74 protests, and 68 of these ADRs were successful (i.e., the protest was resolved without the need for a written decision on the merits).
Finally, GAO reports that the most prevalent reasons for sustaining bid protests during fiscal year 2022 were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) flawed selection decision; and (3) flawed solicitation.
Jenner & Block’s Government Contracts and Grants Practice has extensive bid protest experience in all relevant bid protest forums, to include GAO. The protest team includes a former supervising bid protest hearing officer at GAO, former Court of Federal Claims clerks, and former Federal Circuit clerks. The team stands ready to assist with bid protests and interventions.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Yesterday, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2022. The statutorily mandated report contains an array of information about GAO’s bid protest forum over the prior fiscal year, including the most prevalent reasons GAO sustained protests along with a variety of statistical data. The big news is that while the number of bid protests filed continued to decline, GAO’s “Effectiveness Rate” held steady.
According to the report, contractors filed 1,658 protests, cost claims, and requests for reconsideration this past fiscal year, which reflects a 12% drop from the prior fiscal year and the lowest number of protests filed since 2008 (1,652). Protest filings are down more than 40% since the recent high-water mark of 2,789 filings in fiscal year 2016. When considering these numbers, it is important to remember that multiple cases can be associated with a single solicitation, either because of supplemental protests or multiple protesters, so the number of procurements challenged are materially fewer than the numbers indicate.
GAO resolved the merits of the protest in 455 of the 1,658 cases filed; the remainder of cases were dismissed by GAO or withdrawn by the protester. GAO sustained 59 (13%) protests—the fewest number of sustain decisions since 2009. Despite these notable decreases and downward trends, GAO’s Effectiveness Rate held relatively steady at 51%. The Effectiveness Rate reflects the percent of cases in which the protester obtained some form of relief, either through voluntary corrective action or a GAO decision sustaining the protest. In other words, in more than half of the cases GAO resolved in fiscal year 2022, the bid protest forum was an effective avenue for the protester to obtain at least some relief.
Surprisingly, GAO held only two hearings in fiscal year 2022, the lowest number in at least 20 years (and far less than the 13 hearings held during 2021). This continues a downward trend in the number of hearings held, although deciding cases through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) remains popular and useful. GAO turned to ADR in 74 protests, and 68 of these ADRs were successful (i.e., the protest was resolved without the need for a written decision on the merits).
Finally, GAO reports that the most prevalent reasons for sustaining bid protests during fiscal year 2022 were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) flawed selection decision; and (3) flawed solicitation.
Jenner & Block’s Government Contracts and Grants Practice has extensive bid protest experience in all relevant bid protest forums, to include GAO. The protest team includes a former supervising bid protest hearing officer at GAO, former Court of Federal Claims clerks, and former Federal Circuit clerks. The team stands ready to assist with bid protests and interventions.
According to the report, contractors filed 1,658 protests, cost claims, and requests for reconsideration this past fiscal year, which reflects a 12% drop from the prior fiscal year and the lowest number of protests filed since 2008 (1,652). Protest filings are down more than 40% since the recent high-water mark of 2,789 filings in fiscal year 2016. When considering these numbers, it is important to remember that multiple cases can be associated with a single solicitation, either because of supplemental protests or multiple protesters, so the number of procurements challenged are materially fewer than the numbers indicate.
GAO resolved the merits of the protest in 455 of the 1,658 cases filed; the remainder of cases were dismissed by GAO or withdrawn by the protester. GAO sustained 59 (13%) protests—the fewest number of sustain decisions since 2009. Despite these notable decreases and downward trends, GAO’s Effectiveness Rate held relatively steady at 51%. The Effectiveness Rate reflects the percent of cases in which the protester obtained some form of relief, either through voluntary corrective action or a GAO decision sustaining the protest. In other words, in more than half of the cases GAO resolved in fiscal year 2022, the bid protest forum was an effective avenue for the protester to obtain at least some relief.
Surprisingly, GAO held only two hearings in fiscal year 2022, the lowest number in at least 20 years (and far less than the 13 hearings held during 2021). This continues a downward trend in the number of hearings held, although deciding cases through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) remains popular and useful. GAO turned to ADR in 74 protests, and 68 of these ADRs were successful (i.e., the protest was resolved without the need for a written decision on the merits).
Finally, GAO reports that the most prevalent reasons for sustaining bid protests during fiscal year 2022 were: (1) unreasonable technical evaluation; (2) flawed selection decision; and (3) flawed solicitation.
Jenner & Block’s Government Contracts and Grants Practice has extensive bid protest experience in all relevant bid protest forums, to include GAO. The protest team includes a former supervising bid protest hearing officer at GAO, former Court of Federal Claims clerks, and former Federal Circuit clerks. The team stands ready to assist with bid protests and interventions.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026