California’s Digital Asset Regulation Gets Closer to Final
Under California’s new Digital Financial Assets Law, or DFAL, all entities engaging in “digital financial asset business activity” in the state must be licensed—or have a pending application—by July 1, 2026. On September 29, 2025, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) issued a Notice of Modification to Text of Proposed Regulation (Modification Notice) amending the previously issued April 4, 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
The April regulations were designed to implement the DFAL, passed in 2023, and outlined DFPI’s licensing expectations, application procedures, and surety bond requirements, among other things. The regulations also addressed expectations of licensees to notify and/or disclose to DFPI certain material changes to information a licensee has reported in its licensing application and/or locations where licensees may operate crypto kiosks.
The comment period of the April 4th Notice ended on May 19, 2025 and resulted in over a dozen comments with diverse views and recommendations including suggested oversight efficiencies, some of which were incorporated into the revisions proposed in the Modification Notice.
The comment period for the Modification Notice closes on October 15, 2025.
What has changed with the new proposed rules?
While most of the modifications were technical, a proposed expansion and clarification of exemptions to California’s Money Transmission Act, or MTA, stands out.
1. Exemption to Avoid Duplicative Licenses
The revised regulation expanded the preexisting exemptions in California’s MTA. These exemptions excluded specific entities, including, for instance, public benefit nonprofits, certain nonprofit community service organizations, and certain escrow agents, from being regulated under the MTA as money transmitters.
The modified regulations clarify and expand these exemptions, specifying that DFAL licensees are not required to obtain a separate money transmission license for the following activities:
-
-
-
- Transmitting payments for the purchase or exchange of virtual currency or transmitting the proceeds from such transactions.
- Selling or issuing stored value in California, provided it is used exclusively for the purchase or sale of virtual currency.
- Engaging in money transmission in California, provided the licensee maintains an average daily transmission liability of $50,000 or less per month and complies with the applicable provisions in Chapter 5 of the MTA concerning outstanding liabilities.
-
-
These expanded exemptions offer greater efficiency to California businesses who may be used to other states where this type of activity involves two different licensing and oversight regimes across the board.
2. Technical Amendments
The revised regulations include several technical clarifications, such as:
-
-
-
- Guidance on organizational chart disclosures, including, clarifying that executive officers, as defined in the California Financial Code (as opposed to the more general term “managers”), must be listed in a license application.
- Requirements for personal financial statements to accompany initial license filings.
- A refined definition of “control”, aligning it more closely with the definition used in the California Financial Code.
-
-
These updates aim to increase transparency and consistency in the licensing process.
3. Regulatory Renumbering
Originally, the DFAL regulations were to be added to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 16, Article 3 of the California Code of Regulations, and the Money Transmission Act’s licensing provisions. The modified proposal renumbers these sections to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 5, and Article 3, reflecting the DFAL’s overlap with provisions on securities regulation.
Why Do the Changes Matter?
Persons interested in pursuing digital financial asset licenses under DFAL should take note of the modified regulations and incorporate them into their preparations for licensing ahead of the July 1, 2026 licensing deadline. In the short term, California DFPI is accepting comments on the recent changes through October 15, 2025.
What has changed with the new proposed rules?
While most of the modifications were technical, a proposed expansion and clarification of exemptions to California’s Money Transmission Act, or MTA, stands out.
1. Exemption to Avoid Duplicative Licenses
The revised regulation expanded the preexisting exemptions in California’s MTA. These exemptions excluded specific entities, including, for instance, public benefit nonprofits, certain nonprofit community service organizations, and certain escrow agents, from being regulated under the MTA as money transmitters.
The modified regulations clarify and expand these exemptions, specifying that DFAL licensees are not required to obtain a separate money transmission license for the following activities:
-
-
-
- Transmitting payments for the purchase or exchange of virtual currency or transmitting the proceeds from such transactions.
- Selling or issuing stored value in California, provided it is used exclusively for the purchase or sale of virtual currency.
- Engaging in money transmission in California, provided the licensee maintains an average daily transmission liability of $50,000 or less per month and complies with the applicable provisions in Chapter 5 of the MTA concerning outstanding liabilities.
-
-
These expanded exemptions offer greater efficiency to California businesses who may be used to other states where this type of activity involves two different licensing and oversight regimes across the board.
2. Technical Amendments
The revised regulations include several technical clarifications, such as:
-
-
-
- Guidance on organizational chart disclosures, including, clarifying that executive officers, as defined in the California Financial Code (as opposed to the more general term “managers”), must be listed in a license application.
- Requirements for personal financial statements to accompany initial license filings.
- A refined definition of “control”, aligning it more closely with the definition used in the California Financial Code.
-
-
These updates aim to increase transparency and consistency in the licensing process.
3. Regulatory Renumbering
Originally, the DFAL regulations were to be added to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 16, Article 3 of the California Code of Regulations, and the Money Transmission Act’s licensing provisions. The modified proposal renumbers these sections to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 5, and Article 3, reflecting the DFAL’s overlap with provisions on securities regulation.
Why Do the Changes Matter?
Persons interested in pursuing digital financial asset licenses under DFAL should take note of the modified regulations and incorporate them into their preparations for licensing ahead of the July 1, 2026 licensing deadline. In the short term, California DFPI is accepting comments on the recent changes through October 15, 2025.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Under California’s new Digital Financial Assets Law, or DFAL, all entities engaging in “digital financial asset business activity” in the state must be licensed—or have a pending application—by July 1, 2026. On September 29, 2025, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) issued a Notice of Modification to Text of Proposed Regulation (Modification Notice) amending the previously issued April 4, 2025 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
The April regulations were designed to implement the DFAL, passed in 2023, and outlined DFPI’s licensing expectations, application procedures, and surety bond requirements, among other things. The regulations also addressed expectations of licensees to notify and/or disclose to DFPI certain material changes to information a licensee has reported in its licensing application and/or locations where licensees may operate crypto kiosks.
The comment period of the April 4th Notice ended on May 19, 2025 and resulted in over a dozen comments with diverse views and recommendations including suggested oversight efficiencies, some of which were incorporated into the revisions proposed in the Modification Notice.
The comment period for the Modification Notice closes on October 15, 2025.
What has changed with the new proposed rules?
While most of the modifications were technical, a proposed expansion and clarification of exemptions to California’s Money Transmission Act, or MTA, stands out.
1. Exemption to Avoid Duplicative Licenses
The revised regulation expanded the preexisting exemptions in California’s MTA. These exemptions excluded specific entities, including, for instance, public benefit nonprofits, certain nonprofit community service organizations, and certain escrow agents, from being regulated under the MTA as money transmitters.
The modified regulations clarify and expand these exemptions, specifying that DFAL licensees are not required to obtain a separate money transmission license for the following activities:
-
-
-
- Transmitting payments for the purchase or exchange of virtual currency or transmitting the proceeds from such transactions.
- Selling or issuing stored value in California, provided it is used exclusively for the purchase or sale of virtual currency.
- Engaging in money transmission in California, provided the licensee maintains an average daily transmission liability of $50,000 or less per month and complies with the applicable provisions in Chapter 5 of the MTA concerning outstanding liabilities.
-
-
These expanded exemptions offer greater efficiency to California businesses who may be used to other states where this type of activity involves two different licensing and oversight regimes across the board.
2. Technical Amendments
The revised regulations include several technical clarifications, such as:
-
-
-
- Guidance on organizational chart disclosures, including, clarifying that executive officers, as defined in the California Financial Code (as opposed to the more general term “managers”), must be listed in a license application.
- Requirements for personal financial statements to accompany initial license filings.
- A refined definition of “control”, aligning it more closely with the definition used in the California Financial Code.
-
-
These updates aim to increase transparency and consistency in the licensing process.
3. Regulatory Renumbering
Originally, the DFAL regulations were to be added to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 16, Article 3 of the California Code of Regulations, and the Money Transmission Act’s licensing provisions. The modified proposal renumbers these sections to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 5, and Article 3, reflecting the DFAL’s overlap with provisions on securities regulation.
Why Do the Changes Matter?
Persons interested in pursuing digital financial asset licenses under DFAL should take note of the modified regulations and incorporate them into their preparations for licensing ahead of the July 1, 2026 licensing deadline. In the short term, California DFPI is accepting comments on the recent changes through October 15, 2025.
What has changed with the new proposed rules?
While most of the modifications were technical, a proposed expansion and clarification of exemptions to California’s Money Transmission Act, or MTA, stands out.
1. Exemption to Avoid Duplicative Licenses
The revised regulation expanded the preexisting exemptions in California’s MTA. These exemptions excluded specific entities, including, for instance, public benefit nonprofits, certain nonprofit community service organizations, and certain escrow agents, from being regulated under the MTA as money transmitters.
The modified regulations clarify and expand these exemptions, specifying that DFAL licensees are not required to obtain a separate money transmission license for the following activities:
-
-
-
- Transmitting payments for the purchase or exchange of virtual currency or transmitting the proceeds from such transactions.
- Selling or issuing stored value in California, provided it is used exclusively for the purchase or sale of virtual currency.
- Engaging in money transmission in California, provided the licensee maintains an average daily transmission liability of $50,000 or less per month and complies with the applicable provisions in Chapter 5 of the MTA concerning outstanding liabilities.
-
-
These expanded exemptions offer greater efficiency to California businesses who may be used to other states where this type of activity involves two different licensing and oversight regimes across the board.
2. Technical Amendments
The revised regulations include several technical clarifications, such as:
-
-
-
- Guidance on organizational chart disclosures, including, clarifying that executive officers, as defined in the California Financial Code (as opposed to the more general term “managers”), must be listed in a license application.
- Requirements for personal financial statements to accompany initial license filings.
- A refined definition of “control”, aligning it more closely with the definition used in the California Financial Code.
-
-
These updates aim to increase transparency and consistency in the licensing process.
3. Regulatory Renumbering
Originally, the DFAL regulations were to be added to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 16, Article 3 of the California Code of Regulations, and the Money Transmission Act’s licensing provisions. The modified proposal renumbers these sections to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 5, and Article 3, reflecting the DFAL’s overlap with provisions on securities regulation.
Why Do the Changes Matter?
Persons interested in pursuing digital financial asset licenses under DFAL should take note of the modified regulations and incorporate them into their preparations for licensing ahead of the July 1, 2026 licensing deadline. In the short term, California DFPI is accepting comments on the recent changes through October 15, 2025.
Related Attorneys
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Jenner & Block Partners to Speak at Council on Governmental Relations Conference
On June 11, Partners Mike Vernick, Katie Wynbrandt, and Betsy Henthorne will speak on a panel at the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR) meeting.
June 11, 2026
Recognition
Jenner & Block's Law Firm Defense Practice Receives Band 1 Nationwide Ranking in 2026 Chambers USA
For the third consecutive year, Jenner & Block's Law Firm and Professional Services Defense Practice has achieved a Nationwide Band 1 ranking in the 2026 edition of Chambers USA.
June 10, 2026
Publications
Partner Emily Loeb Quoted in Semafor on Corporate Risk Ahead of Midterm Elections
Partner Emily Loeb was quoted in Semafor in an article examining how House Democrats plan to leverage a potential midterm election majority to pursue oversight investigations into corporations with ties to the Trump administration.
June 9, 2026