California’s Digital Asset Regulation Gets Closer to Final

What Has Changed With the New Proposed Rules?

While most of the modifications were technical, a proposed expansion and clarification of exemptions to California’s Money Transmission Act, or MTA, stands out.

1. Exemption to Avoid Duplicative Licenses

The revised regulation expanded the preexisting exemptions in California’s MTA. These exemptions excluded specific entities, including, for instance, public benefit nonprofits, certain nonprofit community service organizations, and certain escrow agents, from being regulated under the MTA as money transmitters.

The modified regulations clarify and expand these exemptions, specifying that DFAL licensees are not required to obtain a separate money transmission license for the following activities:

• • • • Transmitting payments for the purchase or exchange of virtual currency or transmitting the proceeds from such transactions.
      • Selling or issuing stored value in California, provided it is used exclusively for the purchase or sale of virtual currency.
      • Engaging in money transmission in California, provided the licensee maintains an average daily transmission liability of $50,000 or less per month and complies with the applicable provisions in Chapter 5 of the MTA concerning outstanding liabilities.

These expanded exemptions offer greater efficiency to California businesses who may be used to other states where this type of activity involves two different licensing and oversight regimes across the board.

2. Technical Amendments

The revised regulations include several technical clarifications, such as:

• • • • Guidance on organizational chart disclosures, including, clarifying that executive officers, as defined in the California Financial Code (as opposed to the more general term “managers”), must be listed in a license application.
      • Requirements for personal financial statements to accompany initial license filings.
      • A refined definition of “control”, aligning it more closely with the definition used in the California Financial Code.

These updates aim to increase transparency and consistency in the licensing process.

3. Regulatory Renumbering

Originally, the DFAL regulations were to be added to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 16, Article 3 of the California Code of Regulations, and the Money Transmission Act’s licensing provisions. The modified proposal renumbers these sections to Title 10, Chapter 3, Subchapter 5, and Article 3, reflecting the DFAL’s overlap with provisions on securities regulation.

Why Do the Changes Matter?

Persons interested in pursuing digital financial asset licenses under DFAL should take note of the modified regulations and incorporate them into their preparations for licensing ahead of the July 1, 2026 licensing deadline. In the short term, California DFPI is accepting comments on the recent changes through October 15, 2025.