Client ViacomCBS Prevails in Trademark Dispute over “MTV Floribama Shore”

A team led by Partner Susan J. Kohlmann won a complete victory for client ViacomCBS in a trademark dispute over the title of the MTV reality show "MTV Floribama Shore."

In late 2016, MTV began developing “MTV Floribama Shore,” part of the “Shore” franchise that began with “Jersey Shore” in 2009. MTV planned to broadcast the premiere in November 2017. However, shortly before the premiere, owners of the Flora-Bama Lounge, Package & Oyster Bar—a beach bar, restaurant, and concert venue on the Florida-Alabama border—sent MTV a cease-and-desist letter alleging that the title of the show infringed their trademark rights in the term “Flora-Bama.”

Years later—after two full seasons of “MTV Floribama Shore” had aired and a third was scheduled to premiere—the plaintiffs filed suit against ViacomCBS in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida. They sought an injunction to stop MTV from using the term “Floribama” in the title, alleged claims for federal and state trademark infringement and violations of Florida’s dilution statute, and sought nearly $100 million in damages and the disgorgement of profits from the series. For multiple years, the parties engaged in extensive discovery, including dozens of fact and expert depositions, much of which was conducted during the COVID pandemic, and Judge Robert Hinkle set the case for a jury trial in Tallahassee, Florida, in November.

In his ruling on September 22, 2021, Judge Hinkle granted summary judgment to ViacomCBS, dismissing the case in full. He wrote that ViacomCBS’s First Amendment right to title its expressive work “MTV Floribama Shore” outweighed the plaintiffs’ rights under the Lanham Act.  The court also noted that most viewers of the show likely understood its title as referring to the geographic area where the show is set, rather than the plaintiffs’ establishments, particularly given that the plaintiffs are in an entirely different line of business from ViacomCBS, that MTV’s show never references the plaintiffs, and that the graphic displays of the two marks were entirely dissimilar.  

“We’re delighted to help our client ViacomCBS protect its brand,” said Ms. Kohlmann.

The team also included Partner Alison I. Stein; Associates Jacob L. Tracer, Rémi D. Jaffré, Ethan C. Wong, and Thomas J. Bullock; and Paralegals Charlotte Stretch and Kevin Garcia.

News of the victory was reported by outlets including the Daily Business ReviewLaw360 and Reuters.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Client ViacomCBS Prevails in Trademark Dispute over “MTV Floribama Shore”

A team led by Partner Susan J. Kohlmann won a complete victory for client ViacomCBS in a trademark dispute over the title of the MTV reality show "MTV Floribama Shore."

In late 2016, MTV began developing “MTV Floribama Shore,” part of the “Shore” franchise that began with “Jersey Shore” in 2009. MTV planned to broadcast the premiere in November 2017. However, shortly before the premiere, owners of the Flora-Bama Lounge, Package & Oyster Bar—a beach bar, restaurant, and concert venue on the Florida-Alabama border—sent MTV a cease-and-desist letter alleging that the title of the show infringed their trademark rights in the term “Flora-Bama.”

Years later—after two full seasons of “MTV Floribama Shore” had aired and a third was scheduled to premiere—the plaintiffs filed suit against ViacomCBS in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida. They sought an injunction to stop MTV from using the term “Floribama” in the title, alleged claims for federal and state trademark infringement and violations of Florida’s dilution statute, and sought nearly $100 million in damages and the disgorgement of profits from the series. For multiple years, the parties engaged in extensive discovery, including dozens of fact and expert depositions, much of which was conducted during the COVID pandemic, and Judge Robert Hinkle set the case for a jury trial in Tallahassee, Florida, in November.

In his ruling on September 22, 2021, Judge Hinkle granted summary judgment to ViacomCBS, dismissing the case in full. He wrote that ViacomCBS’s First Amendment right to title its expressive work “MTV Floribama Shore” outweighed the plaintiffs’ rights under the Lanham Act.  The court also noted that most viewers of the show likely understood its title as referring to the geographic area where the show is set, rather than the plaintiffs’ establishments, particularly given that the plaintiffs are in an entirely different line of business from ViacomCBS, that MTV’s show never references the plaintiffs, and that the graphic displays of the two marks were entirely dissimilar.  

“We’re delighted to help our client ViacomCBS protect its brand,” said Ms. Kohlmann.

The team also included Partner Alison I. Stein; Associates Jacob L. Tracer, Rémi D. Jaffré, Ethan C. Wong, and Thomas J. Bullock; and Paralegals Charlotte Stretch and Kevin Garcia.

News of the victory was reported by outlets including the Daily Business ReviewLaw360 and Reuters.

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Associate Steven Arango to Speak at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair

On September 18, Associate Steven Arango will speak on a panel at the Veterans' Legal Career Fair (VLCF), the only legal career fair in the United States dedicated to veterans, active-duty service members, and military spouses.

September 18, 2026

Event

Partner David Greenwald to Speak at PLI Program on Privilege and AI

On August 17, David Greenwald will speak at "Fitting New “Tech” Into the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection," a virtual program hosted by the Practising Law Institute (PLI).

August 17, 2026

Publications

In Law360, Trump Debarment Threat Calls for Targeted Defense Plan

Partners Ashley Callen and David Robbins authored an article for Law360 examining how entities should respond when suspension or debarment is threatened directly by the president, rather than initiated through the usual agency-driven process.

August 6, 2026

Publications

"DC Circuit Undercuts Congress's Subpoena Power: Important New Authority for Targets of Congressional Investigations," National Law Journal

In the National Law Journal, Congressional Investigations Co-Chair Emily Loeb, Special Counsel David Manners-Weber, and Associate Kate Mather examine a recent DC Circuit decision that gives fresh weight to 2020 Supreme Court dicta on common-law privileges in congressional investigations.

July 30, 2026