Client Alert: The Rule Is Dead
On Tuesday, President-Elect Trump named Andrew Ferguson as incoming Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chair. After earning his law degree from the University of Virginia, Mr. Ferguson clerked on the DC Circuit and for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Mr. Ferguson then spent several years at law firms in Washington DC. Most recently, Mr. Ferguson served as chief counsel to Senator Mitch McConnell and as Republican counsel to the US Senate Judiciary Committee, before he became an FTC Commissioner in April 2024. Notably, Mr. Ferguson authored a particularly scathing dissent of the FTC’s rule banning noncompetes, which was passed in April but which has yet to go into effect.[1]
In his dissent, Mr. Ferguson highlighted three main critiques of the noncompete rule. First, he stated that the FTC lacked authority under the FTC Act to issue the rule.[2] He explained that not only does the text of the Act not empower the FTC to issue such a wide-sweeping rule, but this would also deviate from over one hundred years of precedent in which the FTC “did not bring a single enforcement action against any noncompete agreement between an employer and employee.” Second, he explained that, even if the FTC Act did empower the FTC to issue the rule, such a delegation of authority would be unconstitutional and violate the separation of powers. Finally, Mr. Ferguson argued that the rule “violates the basic requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act,” including that the agency engage in “reasoned decision-making.” With this backdrop, it is almost certain that the rule will be dead if Mr. Ferguson is confirmed as FTC Chair. Such an outcome would be no surprise for the second Trump Administration, given President-Elect Trump’s own use of restrictive covenants in business and other contexts.
The end of the noncompete ban will likely set up reengagement by state and local governments to continue crafting their own rules governing noncompetes. This may create a challenging framework where companies need to patch together a variety of different rules in different jurisdictions to make sure they are complying with all applicable laws. With the increasingly remote and nationwide workforce, this will become especially complicated. Jenner & Block’s Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants team remains prepared to assist employers in navigating this ever-changing environment.
In his dissent, Mr. Ferguson highlighted three main critiques of the noncompete rule. First, he stated that the FTC lacked authority under the FTC Act to issue the rule.[2] He explained that not only does the text of the Act not empower the FTC to issue such a wide-sweeping rule, but this would also deviate from over one hundred years of precedent in which the FTC “did not bring a single enforcement action against any noncompete agreement between an employer and employee.” Second, he explained that, even if the FTC Act did empower the FTC to issue the rule, such a delegation of authority would be unconstitutional and violate the separation of powers. Finally, Mr. Ferguson argued that the rule “violates the basic requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act,” including that the agency engage in “reasoned decision-making.” With this backdrop, it is almost certain that the rule will be dead if Mr. Ferguson is confirmed as FTC Chair. Such an outcome would be no surprise for the second Trump Administration, given President-Elect Trump’s own use of restrictive covenants in business and other contexts.
The end of the noncompete ban will likely set up reengagement by state and local governments to continue crafting their own rules governing noncompetes. This may create a challenging framework where companies need to patch together a variety of different rules in different jurisdictions to make sure they are complying with all applicable laws. With the increasingly remote and nationwide workforce, this will become especially complicated. Jenner & Block’s Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants team remains prepared to assist employers in navigating this ever-changing environment.
[1] See FTC Finalizes Near Total Ban of Noncompetes – How You Can Prepare Now (Apr. 25, 2024), https://www.jenner.com/en/news-insights/publications/steps-for-employers-to-consider-in-light-of-ftcs-near-total-ban-of-non-competes.
[2] Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson, Federal Trade Commission (June 28, 2024), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-noncompete-dissent.pdf.
Footnotes
[1] See FTC Finalizes Near Total Ban of Noncompetes – How You Can Prepare Now (Apr. 25, 2024), https://www.jenner.com/en/news-insights/publications/steps-for-employers-to-consider-in-light-of-ftcs-near-total-ban-of-non-competes.
[2] Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson, Federal Trade Commission (June 28, 2024), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-noncompete-dissent.pdf.
Related Lawyers
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
On Tuesday, President-Elect Trump named Andrew Ferguson as incoming Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chair. After earning his law degree from the University of Virginia, Mr. Ferguson clerked on the DC Circuit and for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Mr. Ferguson then spent several years at law firms in Washington DC. Most recently, Mr. Ferguson served as chief counsel to Senator Mitch McConnell and as Republican counsel to the US Senate Judiciary Committee, before he became an FTC Commissioner in April 2024. Notably, Mr. Ferguson authored a particularly scathing dissent of the FTC’s rule banning noncompetes, which was passed in April but which has yet to go into effect.[1]
In his dissent, Mr. Ferguson highlighted three main critiques of the noncompete rule. First, he stated that the FTC lacked authority under the FTC Act to issue the rule.[2] He explained that not only does the text of the Act not empower the FTC to issue such a wide-sweeping rule, but this would also deviate from over one hundred years of precedent in which the FTC “did not bring a single enforcement action against any noncompete agreement between an employer and employee.” Second, he explained that, even if the FTC Act did empower the FTC to issue the rule, such a delegation of authority would be unconstitutional and violate the separation of powers. Finally, Mr. Ferguson argued that the rule “violates the basic requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act,” including that the agency engage in “reasoned decision-making.” With this backdrop, it is almost certain that the rule will be dead if Mr. Ferguson is confirmed as FTC Chair. Such an outcome would be no surprise for the second Trump Administration, given President-Elect Trump’s own use of restrictive covenants in business and other contexts.
The end of the noncompete ban will likely set up reengagement by state and local governments to continue crafting their own rules governing noncompetes. This may create a challenging framework where companies need to patch together a variety of different rules in different jurisdictions to make sure they are complying with all applicable laws. With the increasingly remote and nationwide workforce, this will become especially complicated. Jenner & Block’s Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants team remains prepared to assist employers in navigating this ever-changing environment.
In his dissent, Mr. Ferguson highlighted three main critiques of the noncompete rule. First, he stated that the FTC lacked authority under the FTC Act to issue the rule.[2] He explained that not only does the text of the Act not empower the FTC to issue such a wide-sweeping rule, but this would also deviate from over one hundred years of precedent in which the FTC “did not bring a single enforcement action against any noncompete agreement between an employer and employee.” Second, he explained that, even if the FTC Act did empower the FTC to issue the rule, such a delegation of authority would be unconstitutional and violate the separation of powers. Finally, Mr. Ferguson argued that the rule “violates the basic requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act,” including that the agency engage in “reasoned decision-making.” With this backdrop, it is almost certain that the rule will be dead if Mr. Ferguson is confirmed as FTC Chair. Such an outcome would be no surprise for the second Trump Administration, given President-Elect Trump’s own use of restrictive covenants in business and other contexts.
The end of the noncompete ban will likely set up reengagement by state and local governments to continue crafting their own rules governing noncompetes. This may create a challenging framework where companies need to patch together a variety of different rules in different jurisdictions to make sure they are complying with all applicable laws. With the increasingly remote and nationwide workforce, this will become especially complicated. Jenner & Block’s Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants team remains prepared to assist employers in navigating this ever-changing environment.
[1] See FTC Finalizes Near Total Ban of Noncompetes – How You Can Prepare Now (Apr. 25, 2024), https://www.jenner.com/en/news-insights/publications/steps-for-employers-to-consider-in-light-of-ftcs-near-total-ban-of-non-competes.
[2] Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson, Federal Trade Commission (June 28, 2024), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-noncompete-dissent.pdf.
Footnotes
[1] See FTC Finalizes Near Total Ban of Noncompetes – How You Can Prepare Now (Apr. 25, 2024), https://www.jenner.com/en/news-insights/publications/steps-for-employers-to-consider-in-light-of-ftcs-near-total-ban-of-non-competes.
[2] Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson, Federal Trade Commission (June 28, 2024), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ferguson-noncompete-dissent.pdf.
Related Lawyers
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026