Jenner & Block Lawyers Earn Statewide Honor for $250 Million Defense Verdict

A Jenner & Block team’s $250 million defense verdict earned recognition from the Daily Journal in the publication’s Top Verdicts of 2019 special report.

The report highlights California’s largest and most significant verdicts and appellate reversals.

In a profile about the case, the Daily Journal recognized the team for overcoming numerous challenges throughout the trial and in post-trial motions, noting the lawyers’ “remarkable defense.”

Partner Rick Richmond led the team, which included Partner AnnaMarie A. Van Hoesen and Associates Nayiri K. Pilikyan and Camila A. Connolly. 

Our client was one of five brothers who had businesses – primarily diamond and real estate interests – worth an estimated $7 billion.  At issue was an alleged oral partnership agreement among the five, under which one of them claimed that all money made from their businesses was to be shared equally among the brothers. Our client maintained that no such partnership existed.

Following a two-week trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court and one day of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in our client’s favor on all three causes of action, finding that the plaintiff’s claims fell outside the statute of limitations.

The plaintiff then filed a post-trial motion seeking declarative relief, accounting and equitable estoppel. After a bench trial, Judge Mark Mooney noted in his decision denying the motion that the plaintiff admitted during the course of the trial to committing “outright perjury” and entering into a conspiracy to deprive another brother of business profits. “Far more damaging to plaintiff’s equitable estoppel claim is the doctrine of unclean hands,” the judge wrote. “It is hard to imagine a clearer case for the application of the unclean hands doctrine.”

Paralegals Chris Ward and Rachel Yee and legal assistants Laura Saltzman, Julie Lontok, Maria Reyes and Elizabeth Visick also provided support.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

Jenner & Block Lawyers Earn Statewide Honor for $250 Million Defense Verdict

A Jenner & Block team’s $250 million defense verdict earned recognition from the Daily Journal in the publication’s Top Verdicts of 2019 special report.

The report highlights California’s largest and most significant verdicts and appellate reversals.

In a profile about the case, the Daily Journal recognized the team for overcoming numerous challenges throughout the trial and in post-trial motions, noting the lawyers’ “remarkable defense.”

Partner Rick Richmond led the team, which included Partner AnnaMarie A. Van Hoesen and Associates Nayiri K. Pilikyan and Camila A. Connolly. 

Our client was one of five brothers who had businesses – primarily diamond and real estate interests – worth an estimated $7 billion.  At issue was an alleged oral partnership agreement among the five, under which one of them claimed that all money made from their businesses was to be shared equally among the brothers. Our client maintained that no such partnership existed.

Following a two-week trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court and one day of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict in our client’s favor on all three causes of action, finding that the plaintiff’s claims fell outside the statute of limitations.

The plaintiff then filed a post-trial motion seeking declarative relief, accounting and equitable estoppel. After a bench trial, Judge Mark Mooney noted in his decision denying the motion that the plaintiff admitted during the course of the trial to committing “outright perjury” and entering into a conspiracy to deprive another brother of business profits. “Far more damaging to plaintiff’s equitable estoppel claim is the doctrine of unclean hands,” the judge wrote. “It is hard to imagine a clearer case for the application of the unclean hands doctrine.”

Paralegals Chris Ward and Rachel Yee and legal assistants Laura Saltzman, Julie Lontok, Maria Reyes and Elizabeth Visick also provided support.

Related Capabilities

Related Locations

© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.

News and Insights

Event

Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar

As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.

October 14, 2026

Publications

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill

Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.

October 2026

Event

Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”

On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.

October 8, 2026

Event

Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference

On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.

October 7, 2026

Publications

The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine

Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.

October 5, 2026