"Struck from a jury for being Black?" The Washington Post Op-Ed Calls for Supreme Court to Take Up Client's Case
Publications
February 14, 2024
“The Supreme Court has long held that the Constitution prohibits prosecutors from striking Black people from jury service based on their race. Yet the practice continues….” In a powerful op-ed published by The Washington Post, the former director of the Southern Center for Human Rights, Stephen Bright, calls for the US Supreme Court to take up the case of Jenner & Block’s client, Warren King.
Mr. King, who is intellectually limited and diagnosed with schizophrenia, was sentenced to death in Georgia in 1998. The prosecutor in his trial struck seven of eight prospective Black jurors from Mr. King’s Jury and only three of 34 White jurors. “This was egregious racial discrimination,” said Bright.
“Now the court has an opportunity to send a message to prosecutors across the country that this abhorrent practice is unacceptable – and it should not hesitate to do so. The right to a fair trial before an impartial jury of one’s peers is one of the criminal legal system’s most basic principles. But for many Black people, the promise is illusory,” writes Bright.
The Supreme Court prohibited race-based jury strikes in a decision called Batson in 1986. Yet Batson is often violated. In the case of Mr. King, two judges in his first appeal called the strikes “troubling” and the third judge noted the prosecutor’s “open disdain and outright contempt for Batson” and “the abundant evidence of discrimination showed a violation of that ruling.
Jenner & Block Partner Matt Hellman and Associates Mary Marshall and Donovan Hicks are representing Mr. King in seeking certiorari in U.S. Supreme Court from the 11th Circuit’s denial of his Batson claim and asking that his conviction be vacated because of rank racial discrimination by the prosecutor.
They are joined in representing Mr. King by the Jenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic at the University of Chicago and the Georgia Resource Center. Jenner, the Clinic, and the Georgia Resource Center successfully represented Michael Nance in the Supreme Court in a death penalty case that Matt argued in 2022.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Publications
February 14, 2024
“The Supreme Court has long held that the Constitution prohibits prosecutors from striking Black people from jury service based on their race. Yet the practice continues….” In a powerful op-ed published by The Washington Post, the former director of the Southern Center for Human Rights, Stephen Bright, calls for the US Supreme Court to take up the case of Jenner & Block’s client, Warren King.
Mr. King, who is intellectually limited and diagnosed with schizophrenia, was sentenced to death in Georgia in 1998. The prosecutor in his trial struck seven of eight prospective Black jurors from Mr. King’s Jury and only three of 34 White jurors. “This was egregious racial discrimination,” said Bright.
“Now the court has an opportunity to send a message to prosecutors across the country that this abhorrent practice is unacceptable – and it should not hesitate to do so. The right to a fair trial before an impartial jury of one’s peers is one of the criminal legal system’s most basic principles. But for many Black people, the promise is illusory,” writes Bright.
The Supreme Court prohibited race-based jury strikes in a decision called Batson in 1986. Yet Batson is often violated. In the case of Mr. King, two judges in his first appeal called the strikes “troubling” and the third judge noted the prosecutor’s “open disdain and outright contempt for Batson” and “the abundant evidence of discrimination showed a violation of that ruling.
Jenner & Block Partner Matt Hellman and Associates Mary Marshall and Donovan Hicks are representing Mr. King in seeking certiorari in U.S. Supreme Court from the 11th Circuit’s denial of his Batson claim and asking that his conviction be vacated because of rank racial discrimination by the prosecutor.
They are joined in representing Mr. King by the Jenner & Block Supreme Court and Appellate Clinic at the University of Chicago and the Georgia Resource Center. Jenner, the Clinic, and the Georgia Resource Center successfully represented Michael Nance in the Supreme Court in a death penalty case that Matt argued in 2022.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
Related Locations
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026