Declaration of Non-Independents: A Survey of Non-Independent Directors at S&P 500 Companies
Board composition remains a critical issue for public companies as investors and other stakeholders evaluate the skills, qualifications, and background of directors. It is well-known that stock exchange rules generally only require that a company’s board contains a majority of independent directors, with the exception of controlled companies. However, after these bare requirements, a board has substantial latitude to select its nominees, including non-independent directors.
As companies consider director succession planning and meeting the expectations of investors and other stakeholders, a possible governance option is the use of non-independent directors, including “management” directors who are employed by the applicable company. Management directors usually have oversight responsibilities via their employee roles and have key risk management functions and specific knowledge to help boards in carrying out their oversight duties. With succession planning being a key governance concern, providing executive chairs and other management members access to the boardroom may allow for smoother transitions, and/or “level up” certain directors for further board service. However, management directors suffer from lack of stock exchange and proxy advisor independence, the inability to serve on key committees and the views of certain market participants that ownership/oversight should be separated from day-to-day management of a company.
In light of these competing considerations, we reviewed the S&P 500 for companies with multiple non-independent directors with the goal of determining:
-
- How many companies among the S&P 500 have multiple non-independent directors; and
- The identity of the non-independent directors, particularly as to the presence of management members on the board.
We have identified 161 S&P 500 companies with multiple non-independent directors as of March 25, 2024 in the survey set and reviewed the proxy statements from each company to categorize the various non-independent directors. We found that nearly one third of S&P 500 companies had more than one non-independent director. From that review, we determined other broad patterns and notable takeaways, summarized below.
Key Survey Results and Takeaways
- Companies with exactly two non-independent directors were more common than companies with three or more non-independent directors. Of the 161 companies we identified with multiple non-independent directors, 102 had only two independent directors while 59 had three or more non-independent directors. As a result, almost 20% of the S&P 500 has two non-independent directors while approximately 12% of the S&P 500 has three or more non-independent directors.
- Companies with multiple non-independent directors were split evenly between companies with solely multiple management directors and companies with one management director and one or more non-management non-independent directors. Approximately half of the 161 companies identified consisted solely of management directors while the other half consisted of one management director and other, non-independent directors.
- Management Directors Focus on Leadership and Operational Roles. The most common combination of management directors was the CEO and executive chairman combination, which comprised 48 out of the 161 companies surveyed, or approximately 30%. After the CEO-executive chairman combination, the CEO-“second in command” combination appeared in 27 of the 161 companies, or approximately 17%. Co-CEOs or co-founders only represented five out of 161 companies, which is not surprising given the reluctance many companies in using the the co-CEO function.
- Management Directors in Finance and Other Roles are Rare. Conversely, only four of the 161 companies had a sitting CFO as a director. Zero chief legal officers were management directors and approximately six companies had other executives on the board. Of the six companies which had other executives on the board, most were specific to the applicable company's core business.
- Non-independent directors who were not management directors varied in number and status. Among the other non-independent directors, there were no specific patterns, but common categories including the following:
-
- 20 out of 161 companies had a founder or co-founder on the board.
- 26 out of 161 companies had a former CEO on the board.
- 15 out of 161 companies had at least one family member on the board, and six companies had multiple family members on the board.
- Eight out of 161 companies had stockholder designees or former designees.
- Six out of 161 companies had individuals who were deemed not independent due to related party transaction considerations.
In light of these competing considerations, we reviewed the S&P 500 for companies with multiple non-independent directors with the goal of determining:
-
- How many companies among the S&P 500 have multiple non-independent directors; and
- The identity of the non-independent directors, particularly as to the presence of management members on the board.
We have identified 161 S&P 500 companies with multiple non-independent directors as of March 25, 2024 in the survey set and reviewed the proxy statements from each company to categorize the various non-independent directors. We found that nearly one third of S&P 500 companies had more than one non-independent director. From that review, we determined other broad patterns and notable takeaways, summarized below.
Key Survey Results and Takeaways
- Companies with exactly two non-independent directors were more common than companies with three or more non-independent directors. Of the 161 companies we identified with multiple non-independent directors, 102 had only two independent directors while 59 had three or more non-independent directors. As a result, almost 20% of the S&P 500 has two non-independent directors while approximately 12% of the S&P 500 has three or more non-independent directors.
- Companies with multiple non-independent directors were split evenly between companies with solely multiple management directors and companies with one management director and one or more non-management non-independent directors. Approximately half of the 161 companies identified consisted solely of management directors while the other half consisted of one management director and other, non-independent directors.
- Management Directors Focus on Leadership and Operational Roles. The most common combination of management directors was the CEO and executive chairman combination, which comprised 48 out of the 161 companies surveyed, or approximately 30%. After the CEO-executive chairman combination, the CEO-“second in command” combination appeared in 27 of the 161 companies, or approximately 17%. Co-CEOs or co-founders only represented five out of 161 companies, which is not surprising given the reluctance many companies in using the the co-CEO function.
- Management Directors in Finance and Other Roles are Rare. Conversely, only four of the 161 companies had a sitting CFO as a director. Zero chief legal officers were management directors and approximately six companies had other executives on the board. Of the six companies which had other executives on the board, most were specific to the applicable company's core business.
- Non-independent directors who were not management directors varied in number and status. Among the other non-independent directors, there were no specific patterns, but common categories including the following:
-
- 20 out of 161 companies had a founder or co-founder on the board.
- 26 out of 161 companies had a former CEO on the board.
- 15 out of 161 companies had at least one family member on the board, and six companies had multiple family members on the board.
- Eight out of 161 companies had stockholder designees or former designees.
- Six out of 161 companies had individuals who were deemed not independent due to related party transaction considerations.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
Board composition remains a critical issue for public companies as investors and other stakeholders evaluate the skills, qualifications, and background of directors. It is well-known that stock exchange rules generally only require that a company’s board contains a majority of independent directors, with the exception of controlled companies. However, after these bare requirements, a board has substantial latitude to select its nominees, including non-independent directors.
As companies consider director succession planning and meeting the expectations of investors and other stakeholders, a possible governance option is the use of non-independent directors, including “management” directors who are employed by the applicable company. Management directors usually have oversight responsibilities via their employee roles and have key risk management functions and specific knowledge to help boards in carrying out their oversight duties. With succession planning being a key governance concern, providing executive chairs and other management members access to the boardroom may allow for smoother transitions, and/or “level up” certain directors for further board service. However, management directors suffer from lack of stock exchange and proxy advisor independence, the inability to serve on key committees and the views of certain market participants that ownership/oversight should be separated from day-to-day management of a company.
In light of these competing considerations, we reviewed the S&P 500 for companies with multiple non-independent directors with the goal of determining:
-
- How many companies among the S&P 500 have multiple non-independent directors; and
- The identity of the non-independent directors, particularly as to the presence of management members on the board.
We have identified 161 S&P 500 companies with multiple non-independent directors as of March 25, 2024 in the survey set and reviewed the proxy statements from each company to categorize the various non-independent directors. We found that nearly one third of S&P 500 companies had more than one non-independent director. From that review, we determined other broad patterns and notable takeaways, summarized below.
Key Survey Results and Takeaways
- Companies with exactly two non-independent directors were more common than companies with three or more non-independent directors. Of the 161 companies we identified with multiple non-independent directors, 102 had only two independent directors while 59 had three or more non-independent directors. As a result, almost 20% of the S&P 500 has two non-independent directors while approximately 12% of the S&P 500 has three or more non-independent directors.
- Companies with multiple non-independent directors were split evenly between companies with solely multiple management directors and companies with one management director and one or more non-management non-independent directors. Approximately half of the 161 companies identified consisted solely of management directors while the other half consisted of one management director and other, non-independent directors.
- Management Directors Focus on Leadership and Operational Roles. The most common combination of management directors was the CEO and executive chairman combination, which comprised 48 out of the 161 companies surveyed, or approximately 30%. After the CEO-executive chairman combination, the CEO-“second in command” combination appeared in 27 of the 161 companies, or approximately 17%. Co-CEOs or co-founders only represented five out of 161 companies, which is not surprising given the reluctance many companies in using the the co-CEO function.
- Management Directors in Finance and Other Roles are Rare. Conversely, only four of the 161 companies had a sitting CFO as a director. Zero chief legal officers were management directors and approximately six companies had other executives on the board. Of the six companies which had other executives on the board, most were specific to the applicable company's core business.
- Non-independent directors who were not management directors varied in number and status. Among the other non-independent directors, there were no specific patterns, but common categories including the following:
-
- 20 out of 161 companies had a founder or co-founder on the board.
- 26 out of 161 companies had a former CEO on the board.
- 15 out of 161 companies had at least one family member on the board, and six companies had multiple family members on the board.
- Eight out of 161 companies had stockholder designees or former designees.
- Six out of 161 companies had individuals who were deemed not independent due to related party transaction considerations.
In light of these competing considerations, we reviewed the S&P 500 for companies with multiple non-independent directors with the goal of determining:
-
- How many companies among the S&P 500 have multiple non-independent directors; and
- The identity of the non-independent directors, particularly as to the presence of management members on the board.
We have identified 161 S&P 500 companies with multiple non-independent directors as of March 25, 2024 in the survey set and reviewed the proxy statements from each company to categorize the various non-independent directors. We found that nearly one third of S&P 500 companies had more than one non-independent director. From that review, we determined other broad patterns and notable takeaways, summarized below.
Key Survey Results and Takeaways
- Companies with exactly two non-independent directors were more common than companies with three or more non-independent directors. Of the 161 companies we identified with multiple non-independent directors, 102 had only two independent directors while 59 had three or more non-independent directors. As a result, almost 20% of the S&P 500 has two non-independent directors while approximately 12% of the S&P 500 has three or more non-independent directors.
- Companies with multiple non-independent directors were split evenly between companies with solely multiple management directors and companies with one management director and one or more non-management non-independent directors. Approximately half of the 161 companies identified consisted solely of management directors while the other half consisted of one management director and other, non-independent directors.
- Management Directors Focus on Leadership and Operational Roles. The most common combination of management directors was the CEO and executive chairman combination, which comprised 48 out of the 161 companies surveyed, or approximately 30%. After the CEO-executive chairman combination, the CEO-“second in command” combination appeared in 27 of the 161 companies, or approximately 17%. Co-CEOs or co-founders only represented five out of 161 companies, which is not surprising given the reluctance many companies in using the the co-CEO function.
- Management Directors in Finance and Other Roles are Rare. Conversely, only four of the 161 companies had a sitting CFO as a director. Zero chief legal officers were management directors and approximately six companies had other executives on the board. Of the six companies which had other executives on the board, most were specific to the applicable company's core business.
- Non-independent directors who were not management directors varied in number and status. Among the other non-independent directors, there were no specific patterns, but common categories including the following:
-
- 20 out of 161 companies had a founder or co-founder on the board.
- 26 out of 161 companies had a former CEO on the board.
- 15 out of 161 companies had at least one family member on the board, and six companies had multiple family members on the board.
- Eight out of 161 companies had stockholder designees or former designees.
- Six out of 161 companies had individuals who were deemed not independent due to related party transaction considerations.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026