The US Office of Space Commerce Seeks Industry Feedback on a Potential New Regulatory Authorization Regime for “Novel” Commercial Space Activities
On December 3, 2025, the Office of Space Commerce hosted the first stakeholder engagement session to shape the regulatory landscape that will ultimately form the mission authorization for novel commercial space activities pursuant to Section 5 of Executive Order No. 14335, Enabling Competition in the Commercial Space Industry, August 13, 2025, which directs the Secretary of Commerce to develop and implement a mission-authorization process for novel commercial space activities.
During the briefing on the office’s concept for an initial framework, the Director of Policy, Advocacy and International Division, Mr. Gabriel Swiney, described the OSC’s overarching goal to streamline mission authorization while expediting authorization of US novel commercial space activities. While Executive Order 14335 does not define novel commercial space activities, the OSC is considering creating a regulatory framework for operators who engage in satellite servicing, In-Space Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) activities generally, commercial low-earth orbit destinations (CLDs), lunar operations, space resource operations, and perhaps even nuclear power and propulsion activities in space. OSC emphasized that these categories are preliminary and that it has not yet released draft rules, application requirements, timelines, or process flows.
Additionally, Mr. Swiney highlighted that the office was mindful of stakeholders’ consistent feedback that the authorization processes currently in place often require several duplicative applications, and that the final approval or licensing timelines remain lengthy. Thus, the OSC has undertaken interagency coordination across the federal government to draft an initial concept of the forthcoming regulatory process where the OSC would coordinate with the relevant government stakeholders on a set timeline.
Notably, OSC did not present any concrete regulatory proposal at the December 3 session. The discussion remained conceptual, with OSC explicitly stating that it is still developing the structure, scope, and timelines for a new authorization regime.
Although the Office of Space Commerce did not address the Federal Communications Commission’s ongoing work during the December 3 session, the FCC has actively modernized its regulatory framework for ISAM and other on-orbit operations. Between 2023 and 2024, the FCC adopted several ISAM-related orders updating requirements for proximity operations, reliability disclosures, and orbital-debris mitigation, and it continues to consider additional maneuverability, disposal, and reporting obligations in pending rulemakings. The FCC underscored this modernization effort in its recent Satellite and Earth Station Second Report and Order, explaining that the updated satellite licensing framework is designed to accommodate rapidly evolving activities such as in-space servicing, assembly, and other emerging commercial on-orbit operations. At present, these FCC efforts constitute the most detailed federal regulatory guidance applicable to many ISAM and servicing activities.
Commerce’s mission-authorization concept is intended to offer operators with a single point of contact and single point of application for orbital mission authorization, rather than change existing substantive approval and licensing requirements. The FCC, for example, will continue to exercise exclusive authority over all communications and spectrum operations for ISAM and other novel missions, and operators should expect to maintain compliance with FCC requirements even after a Commerce-administered authorization process is established. Until the federal government formally implements a unified or harmonized approach, companies pursuing novel commercial space activities will likely navigate parallel regulatory processes across multiple agencies. Moreover, Commerce indicates that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) intends to accept OSC’s analysis as part of its expedited review process under a forthcoming predetermined timeline.
The OSC continues to invite dialogue with stakeholders, accepting feedback via their webpage. Commerce accepts opt-in mailing and engagement list requests from the public and email inputs.
Finally, Commerce anticipates submitting the regulatory proposal for approval in late January 2026.
During the briefing on the office’s concept for an initial framework, the Director of Policy, Advocacy and International Division, Mr. Gabriel Swiney, described the OSC’s overarching goal to streamline mission authorization while expediting authorization of US novel commercial space activities. While Executive Order 14335 does not define novel commercial space activities, the OSC is considering creating a regulatory framework for operators who engage in satellite servicing, In-Space Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) activities generally, commercial low-earth orbit destinations (CLDs), lunar operations, space resource operations, and perhaps even nuclear power and propulsion activities in space. OSC emphasized that these categories are preliminary and that it has not yet released draft rules, application requirements, timelines, or process flows.
Additionally, Mr. Swiney highlighted that the office was mindful of stakeholders’ consistent feedback that the authorization processes currently in place often require several duplicative applications, and that the final approval or licensing timelines remain lengthy. Thus, the OSC has undertaken interagency coordination across the federal government to draft an initial concept of the forthcoming regulatory process where the OSC would coordinate with the relevant government stakeholders on a set timeline.
Notably, OSC did not present any concrete regulatory proposal at the December 3 session. The discussion remained conceptual, with OSC explicitly stating that it is still developing the structure, scope, and timelines for a new authorization regime.
Although the Office of Space Commerce did not address the Federal Communications Commission’s ongoing work during the December 3 session, the FCC has actively modernized its regulatory framework for ISAM and other on-orbit operations. Between 2023 and 2024, the FCC adopted several ISAM-related orders updating requirements for proximity operations, reliability disclosures, and orbital-debris mitigation, and it continues to consider additional maneuverability, disposal, and reporting obligations in pending rulemakings. The FCC underscored this modernization effort in its recent Satellite and Earth Station Second Report and Order, explaining that the updated satellite licensing framework is designed to accommodate rapidly evolving activities such as in-space servicing, assembly, and other emerging commercial on-orbit operations. At present, these FCC efforts constitute the most detailed federal regulatory guidance applicable to many ISAM and servicing activities.
Commerce’s mission-authorization concept is intended to offer operators with a single point of contact and single point of application for orbital mission authorization, rather than change existing substantive approval and licensing requirements. The FCC, for example, will continue to exercise exclusive authority over all communications and spectrum operations for ISAM and other novel missions, and operators should expect to maintain compliance with FCC requirements even after a Commerce-administered authorization process is established. Until the federal government formally implements a unified or harmonized approach, companies pursuing novel commercial space activities will likely navigate parallel regulatory processes across multiple agencies. Moreover, Commerce indicates that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) intends to accept OSC’s analysis as part of its expedited review process under a forthcoming predetermined timeline.
The OSC continues to invite dialogue with stakeholders, accepting feedback via their webpage. Commerce accepts opt-in mailing and engagement list requests from the public and email inputs.
Finally, Commerce anticipates submitting the regulatory proposal for approval in late January 2026.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
On December 3, 2025, the Office of Space Commerce hosted the first stakeholder engagement session to shape the regulatory landscape that will ultimately form the mission authorization for novel commercial space activities pursuant to Section 5 of Executive Order No. 14335, Enabling Competition in the Commercial Space Industry, August 13, 2025, which directs the Secretary of Commerce to develop and implement a mission-authorization process for novel commercial space activities.
During the briefing on the office’s concept for an initial framework, the Director of Policy, Advocacy and International Division, Mr. Gabriel Swiney, described the OSC’s overarching goal to streamline mission authorization while expediting authorization of US novel commercial space activities. While Executive Order 14335 does not define novel commercial space activities, the OSC is considering creating a regulatory framework for operators who engage in satellite servicing, In-Space Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) activities generally, commercial low-earth orbit destinations (CLDs), lunar operations, space resource operations, and perhaps even nuclear power and propulsion activities in space. OSC emphasized that these categories are preliminary and that it has not yet released draft rules, application requirements, timelines, or process flows.
Additionally, Mr. Swiney highlighted that the office was mindful of stakeholders’ consistent feedback that the authorization processes currently in place often require several duplicative applications, and that the final approval or licensing timelines remain lengthy. Thus, the OSC has undertaken interagency coordination across the federal government to draft an initial concept of the forthcoming regulatory process where the OSC would coordinate with the relevant government stakeholders on a set timeline.
Notably, OSC did not present any concrete regulatory proposal at the December 3 session. The discussion remained conceptual, with OSC explicitly stating that it is still developing the structure, scope, and timelines for a new authorization regime.
Although the Office of Space Commerce did not address the Federal Communications Commission’s ongoing work during the December 3 session, the FCC has actively modernized its regulatory framework for ISAM and other on-orbit operations. Between 2023 and 2024, the FCC adopted several ISAM-related orders updating requirements for proximity operations, reliability disclosures, and orbital-debris mitigation, and it continues to consider additional maneuverability, disposal, and reporting obligations in pending rulemakings. The FCC underscored this modernization effort in its recent Satellite and Earth Station Second Report and Order, explaining that the updated satellite licensing framework is designed to accommodate rapidly evolving activities such as in-space servicing, assembly, and other emerging commercial on-orbit operations. At present, these FCC efforts constitute the most detailed federal regulatory guidance applicable to many ISAM and servicing activities.
Commerce’s mission-authorization concept is intended to offer operators with a single point of contact and single point of application for orbital mission authorization, rather than change existing substantive approval and licensing requirements. The FCC, for example, will continue to exercise exclusive authority over all communications and spectrum operations for ISAM and other novel missions, and operators should expect to maintain compliance with FCC requirements even after a Commerce-administered authorization process is established. Until the federal government formally implements a unified or harmonized approach, companies pursuing novel commercial space activities will likely navigate parallel regulatory processes across multiple agencies. Moreover, Commerce indicates that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) intends to accept OSC’s analysis as part of its expedited review process under a forthcoming predetermined timeline.
The OSC continues to invite dialogue with stakeholders, accepting feedback via their webpage. Commerce accepts opt-in mailing and engagement list requests from the public and email inputs.
Finally, Commerce anticipates submitting the regulatory proposal for approval in late January 2026.
During the briefing on the office’s concept for an initial framework, the Director of Policy, Advocacy and International Division, Mr. Gabriel Swiney, described the OSC’s overarching goal to streamline mission authorization while expediting authorization of US novel commercial space activities. While Executive Order 14335 does not define novel commercial space activities, the OSC is considering creating a regulatory framework for operators who engage in satellite servicing, In-Space Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) activities generally, commercial low-earth orbit destinations (CLDs), lunar operations, space resource operations, and perhaps even nuclear power and propulsion activities in space. OSC emphasized that these categories are preliminary and that it has not yet released draft rules, application requirements, timelines, or process flows.
Additionally, Mr. Swiney highlighted that the office was mindful of stakeholders’ consistent feedback that the authorization processes currently in place often require several duplicative applications, and that the final approval or licensing timelines remain lengthy. Thus, the OSC has undertaken interagency coordination across the federal government to draft an initial concept of the forthcoming regulatory process where the OSC would coordinate with the relevant government stakeholders on a set timeline.
Notably, OSC did not present any concrete regulatory proposal at the December 3 session. The discussion remained conceptual, with OSC explicitly stating that it is still developing the structure, scope, and timelines for a new authorization regime.
Although the Office of Space Commerce did not address the Federal Communications Commission’s ongoing work during the December 3 session, the FCC has actively modernized its regulatory framework for ISAM and other on-orbit operations. Between 2023 and 2024, the FCC adopted several ISAM-related orders updating requirements for proximity operations, reliability disclosures, and orbital-debris mitigation, and it continues to consider additional maneuverability, disposal, and reporting obligations in pending rulemakings. The FCC underscored this modernization effort in its recent Satellite and Earth Station Second Report and Order, explaining that the updated satellite licensing framework is designed to accommodate rapidly evolving activities such as in-space servicing, assembly, and other emerging commercial on-orbit operations. At present, these FCC efforts constitute the most detailed federal regulatory guidance applicable to many ISAM and servicing activities.
Commerce’s mission-authorization concept is intended to offer operators with a single point of contact and single point of application for orbital mission authorization, rather than change existing substantive approval and licensing requirements. The FCC, for example, will continue to exercise exclusive authority over all communications and spectrum operations for ISAM and other novel missions, and operators should expect to maintain compliance with FCC requirements even after a Commerce-administered authorization process is established. Until the federal government formally implements a unified or harmonized approach, companies pursuing novel commercial space activities will likely navigate parallel regulatory processes across multiple agencies. Moreover, Commerce indicates that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) intends to accept OSC’s analysis as part of its expedited review process under a forthcoming predetermined timeline.
The OSC continues to invite dialogue with stakeholders, accepting feedback via their webpage. Commerce accepts opt-in mailing and engagement list requests from the public and email inputs.
Finally, Commerce anticipates submitting the regulatory proposal for approval in late January 2026.
Related Lawyers
Related Capabilities
© 2026 Jenner & Block LLP. Attorney Advertising. Jenner & Block LLP is an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership including professional corporations. This publication, presentation, or event is not intended to provide legal advice but to provide information on legal matters and/or firm news of interest to our clients and colleagues. Readers or attendees should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to matters mentioned in this publication or at this event. The attorney responsible for this communication is Brent E. Kidwell, Jenner & Block LLP, 353 N. Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60654-3456. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Jenner & Block London LLP, an affiliate of Jenner & Block LLP, is a limited liability partnership established under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority with SRA number 615729. Information regarding the data we collect and the rights you have over your data can be found in our Privacy Notice. For further inquiries, please contact dataprotection@jenner.com.
News and Insights
Event
Amanda Shafer Berman to Speak on Energy and Administrative Law at WEN-DC Webinar
As the Supreme Court's new Term begins, Jenner & Block Partner Amanda Shafer Berman will join a Women's Energy Network of Washington, DC (WEN-DC) webinar on how the Court's decisions are shaping the energy sector.
October 14, 2026
Publications
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman Quoted in Bloomberg Law on Senate Permitting Overhaul Bill
Partner Amanda Shafer Berman was quoted in an October 5 Bloomberg Law article, "Permitting Deal Gives Projects Defense Against Litigation Delays," on the Senate's new permitting overhaul package and its expected impact on litigation over federal permitting reversals.
October 2026
Event
Partner John Storino to Speak at Sandpiper Partners' “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable”
On October 8, Partner John Storino will serve as a panelist at the “AI and Outside Counsel Guidelines Roundtable,” hosted by Sandpiper Partners in Chicago.
October 8, 2026
Event
Partner Meghan Greenfield to Speak on Supreme Court Climate Case at Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference
On Wednesday, October 7, Partner Meghan Greenfield will speak on a panel titled "Boulder County v. Suncor Energy: What the Supreme Court's Climate Case Means for the Energy Industry" at the Edison Electric Institute's Fall Legal Conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.
October 7, 2026
Publications
The Form Rules Everything: A Seventh Circuit Ruling on ERISA's Substantial Compliance Doctrine
Partner Joseph Torres and Special Counsel Jennifer Beach authored an article for Employee Relations Law Journal examining the Seventh Circuit's decision in Packaging Corp. of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, a ruling that addresses both the standard of review in ERISA interpleader actions and the continued viability of the substantial compliance doctrine for changing plan beneficiaries.
October 5, 2026