|
 |
|
|
6/14/2004
On March 29, Jenner & Block Partner Paul M. Smith argued the Respondents’ position in Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, et al (No. 03-101), a U.S. Supreme Court case that could significantly impact conservationists’ ability to go to court to compel government agencies to protect endangered wilderness areas.
As a public service, Jenner & Block has created this online depository of many of the court documents and amicus briefs filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in this case.
On June 14, the High Court released its decision in the case (available below).
Related Document(s):- U.S. Supreme Court's Decision (June 14, 2004)
- Transcript of Oral Argument before U.S. Supreme Court: March 29, 2004
- Brief For The Petitioners
- Reply Brief For The Petitioners
- Brief of Respondents Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, et al.
- Brief for Respondents Utah Shared Access Alliance, et al. in Support of Petitioners
- Amici Curiae Brief of Defenders of Wildlife and Public Citizen in Support of Respondents
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Former Chairs and General Counsels of the Council on Environmental Quality in Support of Respondents
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Montana Wilderness Association in Support of Respondents
- Brief of the National Organization of Veterans’ Advocates as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents
- Brief of Amici Curiae Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. in Support of Respondents
- Brief of Amici Curiae Professors of Administrative and Environmental Law in Support of Respondents Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, et al.
- Brief Amicus Curiae of the States of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota and Wisconsin in Support of Respondents
- Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioners
|
|
