|
 |
|
|
8/3/2006
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on December 12, 2005 to hear challenges to the Texas congressional redistricting plan passed in 2003.
Below are links to the documents currently before the Court in this case.
The Court consolidated four appeals from a three-judge federal district court's ruling that had upheld the map against all challenges. The Court held a two-hour oral argument on March 1, 2006, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
The cases are League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, 05-204; Travis County v. Perry, 05-254; Jackson v. Perry, 05-276; and GI Forum of Texas v. Perry, 05-439.
Jenner & Block Partners Paul M. Smith and Sam Hirsch represent the Jackson appellants, a group of Democratic voters and officeholders who allege that the map violates the Constitution because the Texas Legislature redrew a lawful districting plan in the middle of the decade, for the sole purpose of maximizing partisan advantage. The Jackson appellants also contend that the 2003 plan dilutes African-American voting strength in and around Fort Worth, in violation of the Voting Rights Act, and that the map's South Texas districts are excessively race-driven, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
The Court's decision and other documents in Vieth v. Jubelirer, a 2004 case also concerning congressional redistricting, is available by clicking here.
Summer 2006 Remedial Proceedings on Remand
U.S. Supreme Court Decision
Parties' Merits Briefs
Amicus Briefs
- Brief of Amicus Curiae the North Carolina State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (1/10/06)
- Brief for Amicus Curiae Fort Worth-Tarrant County Branch NAACP in Support of Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief of Samuel Issacharoff, Burt Neuborne, and Richard H. Pildes as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief for Amici Curiae League of Women Voters of the United States and League of Women Voters of Texas in Support of Reversal (1/10/06)
- Brief of Amici Curiae the Reform Institute, Thomas Mann, and Norman Ornstein in Support of Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief of Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law as Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief for the Center for American Progress as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief for Amicus Curiae Neil H. Cogan in Support of Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae University Professors Concerned About Equal Representation For Equal Numbers of People in Support of Appellants (1/10/06)
- Brief of Amici Curiae Professors Gary King, Bernard Grofman, Andrew Gelman, and Jonathan N. Katz, in Support of Neither Party (1/10/06)
- Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellees (2/1/06)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae Ron Wilson in Support of Appellees (2/1/06)
- Brief of the Republican National Committee as Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellees (2/1/06)
- Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Legislative Exchange Council and Free Enterprise Coalition in Support of Appellees (2/1/06)
- Brief of Amici Curiae Speaker of The Georgia House of Representatives Glenn Richardson; Speaker Pro Tempore of The Georgia State Senate Eric Johnson; House Majority Leader Jerry Keen; Senate Majority Leader Tommie Williams; and Senator Chip Rogers and Representative Bobby Franklin, Chairmen of The Reapportionment Committees of The Georgia General Assembly in Support of Appellees (2/1/06)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae Congressman Henry Bonilla in Support of Appellees (2/1/06)
- Brief of Amicus Curiae Senator Robert C. Jubelirer in Support of Appellees (2/1/06)
- Motion For Leave to File and Brief For Edward Blum, Visiting Fellow at The American Enterprise Institute, and Roger Clegg, President of The Center For Equal Opportunity as Amici Curiae in Opposition to Appellants (2/2/06)
- Brief of Amici Curiae Alan Heslop, PhD.; Rod Adair; Gary Berner; John A. Morgan; and Robert Ward in Support of Appellees (2/6/06)
- Brief for the States of Utah, Nevada, and Ohio as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees (2/6/06)
Oral Argument Transcript
Parties' Motions
U.S. Supreme Court Orders
2005 U.S. Supreme Court Filings
Prior U.S. Supreme Court Filings & Order
|
|
